Here you go.... testimony from a former naval officer who has a spotless record and military clearance.
My gawd! Biden is soooo scary, how do you even sleep?
Attorneys for Fox convinced the judge that....:
"The “ 'general tenor’ of the show,” her opinion stated, “should … inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not ‘stating actual facts’ about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in ‘exaggeration’ and ‘nonliteral commentary.’ … [G]iven Mr. Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer ‘arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism’ about the statements he makes.” '
en.wikipedia.org
"...Giuliani and the
Post published a version of the story with unclear provenance that alleged but did not prove Joe Biden's involvement in his son's affairs. Bannon had anticipated the
Journal story would appear on the 19th, and Trump told reporters to expect a major story in the
Journal. Internally, the insinuation that their journalism was affiliated with or on behalf of Trump irritated the
Journal editors. Tony Bobulinski, a business partner of Hunter Biden who was interviewed for the
Journal's report, was spooked that the
Journal would not run the piece and issued his own statement on the 21st, which
Breitbart News published unedited. At the next day's presidential debate, Trump made vague reference to the emails and hosted Bobulinski as his special guest. After the debate,
the Journal published its brief story that Bobulinski and corporate records assessed by the Journal "show no role for Joe Biden".
[57]
Aftermath
After a scandal narrative failed to gain traction in the mainstream press, conservative media and personalities pivoted to a "meta narrative" that the press, social media platforms and the deep state were suppressing news of the scandal.
[58]"