- Joined
- Nov 16, 2017
- Messages
- 86,756
- Reaction score
- 86,330
- Location
- Southern CA.
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Hell ****ing yeah I do. It is their fault for not being able to simply exist in the same room as me anymore, regardless that I'm not pushing my identity down their throat to the point they have to treat me like a delicate flower, where I just need basic human respect from family. I don't feel guilty not reaching out to those that curse me on sight lol neither would you? I'm also literally saying I don't block or cut them off. If they called me today and treated me with respect to move on, I'd pretend like it never happened. It's all I want, I didn't transition because I wanted my family to hate me, it was literally a reason for me not to at the start. My basic baseline requirement to having people in my life is that they respect me. Not that they agree with everything I believe in.I'm reading what you said, and I'm telling you how I read it.
You are rationalizing your action to cut off family members as their fault. You say that you are multifaceted, but you collapse your relationships with family to just one that for you is mandatory.
Your father cutting you off is his fault, I'd assume, and that's a shame. But in the end you make the same demands he does.
No I'm saying its an answer, not the answer. There's a difference.You are saying political violence and assassination is the answer here.
So shoot your shot.That is the definition of violent rhetoric, and I don't think it's helpful at all. In fact, I think it may violate the rules of this forum.
Yes. I'm not sure what's confusing about what I wrote.Sole motive?
I agree with you but this persons current views from at least the last few years are being misrepresented.
I'll believe it when it comes out of his own mouth. This reads as "dont let a tragedy go to waste" from a family that really doesn't want their brand of propaganda to be in the hot seat.Thread Update:
The FBI has reported that the family of the assassin has confirmed his left-wing ideology partifularly in the last few years. Patel specified during a public briefing that Robinson's family collectively described him as having been "deeply indoctrinated with leftist ideology," and that he had expressed hatred for what Kirk represented, including in text exchanges where he mentioned an opportunity to "take out" Kirk.
Quoted without comment... speaks for itself.I don't care if the Republicans catch bullets
Hell ****ing yeah I do. It is their fault for not being able to simply exist in the same room as me anymore, regardless that I'm not pushing my identity down their throat to the point they have to treat me like a delicate flower, where I just need basic human respect from family. I don't feel guilty not reaching out to those that curse me on sight lol neither would you? I'm also literally saying I don't block or cut them off. If they called me today and treated me with respect to move on, I'd pretend like it never happened. It's all I want, I didn't transition because I wanted my family to hate me, it was literally a reason for me not to at the start. My basic baseline requirement to having people in my life is that they respect me. Not that they agree with everything I believe in.
I demand my father treat me, their child, with love and kindness and just try to understand knowing he may never get it. Normal things. My father demands I never verbally disagree with him, anything he stands for, or use facts to argue my points because to him, raising me means I owe him on demand chores, listening to his hours long conspiracies without letting me respond, and view him as a good person even though he has done some genuinely evil things in life.
They are hardly the same demands
Except it's not just speech for violence. Its speech and political will used by the right to advocate for and pass laws that are seen as harmful by all these various communities and when the list of communities you think are evil and degenerate outnumber the list of people you call allies then you might look around one day and find not a lot of people give a flying **** what happens to you. Thats the consequence of waging war against various communities rather than building community with various people.No, they are not. He also supported the murderer Luigi Mangione. He's all for political violence until it might come back to haunt him then he cries crocodile tears. I don't buy it for a second.
The left has pushed for speech as violence for a decade now and they now use that to defend violence as speech, as Piker did in the Luigi Mangione case. While he defends acts of murder regularly, he calls for it punctuated cynically with "in a video game" or "in Minecraft" to avoid personal repercussions.
If you're asking me to accept that Trump calling out the left for violent rhetoric is a call to violence but Hassan Piker's actual calls to violence aren't then you aren't part of the solution. Hell, even calling Trump's statements and Hassan's equal is missing the entire point.
Thats apathy not advocacy.Quoted without comment... speaks for itself.
It appears the actual motive or motives will be addressed tomorrow as the charges are announced.Yes. I'm not sure what's confusing about what I wrote.
There are no calls for violence on his stream that I’ve ever heard so your premise is failed. He’s clearly become more savvy in the last few years because there’s been nothing like the clip you are promoting that I’ve ever seen. I think the political temperature has changed and piker has clearly adjusted his tone.No, they are not. He also supported the murderer Luigi Mangione. He's all for political violence until it might come back to haunt him then he cries crocodile tears. I don't buy it for a second.
The left has pushed for speech as violence for a decade now and they now use that to defend violence as speech, as Piker did in the Luigi Mangione case. While he defends acts of murder regularly, he calls for it punctuated cynically with "in a video game" or "in Minecraft" to avoid personal repercussions.
If you're asking me to accept that Trump calling out the left for violent rhetoric is a call to violence but Hassan Piker's actual calls to violence aren't then you aren't part of the solution. Hell, even calling Trump's statements and Hassan's equal is missing the entire point.
Expand your point cause no. They aren't at all. And I explained it well enough to let it be if you don't agree. I'm not barking up his tree to come do chores for me at my house, nor would I given interacting with him is more listening to him get drunk and bring up my dead mom calling her a cheating whore. You have no idea what you are talking about saying my demand to him to simply have a conversation with me as equals is the same as someone hell bent on emotional abusing me.You are simply taking your father's hard line and justifying it for yourself.
They are the same demands.
I can only give you my personal opinion on this based on my personal experience.Would Jesus dead name me?
Charges don't address motive. Unless Robinson speaks up, it appears there's little to go on in terms of motive.It appears the actual motive or motives will be addressed tomorrow as the charges are announced.
I found partial
“The one issue that I think is so against our senses, so against the natural law – and dare I say, a throbbing middle finger to God – is the transgender thing happening in America right now. You’re in a church, so it’s important to remember Deuteronomy 22:5, ‘A woman shall not wear a man’s garment nor shall a man put on a woman’s cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the lord your God."
I'd love to read all of what he said .. I can only find the edited video like you posted showing only a cherry picked piece
Okay, not a bad idea actually. I pray a lot actually, spiritual in a more natural sense. Atheist to the bone, but placebos work way more than they should leads me to believe in some higher level subconscious connection to mental health and body health. So praying to this person named Jesus sounds like a good evening activity. My guess is that he will respond with neither name cause he is cool like that, and probably sees a name when he looks at me, not what humans decided to call me on a whim.I can only give you my personal opinion on this based on my personal experience.
I think you should call out to him and ask him to call you... to speak to you... to call you by name and then remain open to see how he answers that. Could be kind of mystical.
When Jesus called Simon, he changed his name to Peter.
And Jesus appeared in a vision to John and said this,
To him who overcomes, to him I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white stone, and a new name written on the stone which no one knows but he who receives it.
I try to be careful being overly outwardly Christian here because it offends many, but you asked about Jesus.
Some people may be seeing and using that as the "gotcha".It seems after the incorrect assumption of the shooter being trans, there's been a rush to grab on to anything that vindicates that position of "trans ideology" being at play here. Currently the trans roommate angle is the "gotcha".
The in a video game part is usually to get around TOS.Note how they clipped out the "in a video game" that he said multiple times.
What a hilarious video.I've posted it a few times on various related threads, i.e. segments from many of Charlie Kirk's podcasts.
Here it is again:
Expand your point cause no. They aren't at all. And I explained it well enough to let it be if you don't agree. I'm not barking up his tree to come do chores for me at my house, nor would I given interacting with him is more listening to him get drunk and bring up my dead mom calling her a cheating whore. You have no idea what you are talking about saying my demand to him to simply have a conversation with me as equals is the same as someone hell bent on emotional abusing me.
Or maybe you are right, and honestly? I don't give a ****ing duck about it. I'll be the unreasonable one here, easy. At least it leads to more joy and family bonding in my favor. I lose nothing ignoring my dad.
I think in some ways both sides of this particular argument are fairly moot.Kirk had his own security and the school allowed both concealed and open carry of firearms on campus. It was not a gun free zone.
I've posted it a few times on various related threads, i.e. segments from many of Charlie Kirk's podcasts.
Here it is again:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?