I have refuted this already.
Revenues for the Fed, have been increasing for almost every year before the tax cut back over 20 years except for 2009 when the recession bottomed out
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/GettyImages-591478749-fb686ce4aa5c4dc1b2ef76949bb8ea81.jpg)
It's why anyone saying that this is about election integrity and accepting this company as the one to conduct an audit is knee slapping hysterical. Never mind the fact they've never performed this kind of audit before and have no experience with elections. That doesn't sound like much of a CV to make it a viable candidate.
still wondering if he was implying that the US Revenue only went up because of the tax cutI always do, and seldom have trouble backing my claims.
Like this refutation of you false insinuation that my claim is false.
You can clearly see the budget busting effects of TRump’s tax giveaway to Wall Street. Ironically, this was his one and only legislative victory.
Fiscal Data Explains the National Deficit
Check out @FiscalService Fiscal Data’s new national deficit page! #NationalDeficitdatalab.usaspending.gov
Stop the bullshit! You can not point to any mail-in voter fraud at all that in anyway impacted the 2020 election, nothing! The trade-off to have an extra 10%-20% voter participation far outweighs any possible fraud, period. What you're not admitting to us or maybe even to yourself is that the higher the participation the worse it is for Republicans which is why the GOP is blatantly passing voter suppression bills because if they don't they're toast.
Did Trump have to deal with the Great Recession that was caused by GW Bush? Trump inherited a strong, growing economy that was setting records for most months in a row with job gains. Trump passed a ridiculous tax cut during a peak in the economy...no one does that because it adds debt and wasn't needed. He did it to boost his numbers - in effect creating a false increase in the economy. Trump was a disaster and it's shocking that he's able to grift so many Americans. The word I like to use to describe Trump supporters is "SUCKER."
Such hatred, why? either answer the question or no more responses. None of what you posted impacted you, your family, or the country negatively to create such hatred. Have no idea what motivates people like you that you would vote against someone and give us Biden/Harris, Stunning!!
Attacks on American democracy itself does not impact me, my family or the country? Stunning.
Got it and of course you are sure they didn't vote twice? Why can't I get anyone on the left to explain why people shouldn't vote early in person, qualify for an absentee ballot, or on election day? Tell us which is more susceptible to fraud, mail in ballots or in person voting
What attack? Chain of custody violations of mail in ballots are a greater threat to our democracy than any President could ever be due to the checks and balances. Your comments come from a civics challenged, radical nanny state, big gov't liberal
Why shouldn't people vote early and in person? They wanted to social distance in the age of covid. In-person ballots are no more susceptible to fraud than mail-in ballots and vis-a-versa.
The important thing to remember is that the audit and all of this talk about "election integrity" is really just a cover for what's really going on: trying to prove the former president's ridiculous premise that the only way he could lose was through election fraud. In the past we haven't had large efforts to vote fraudulently, yet suddenly we're expected to believe there was some massive wave of fraud by people voting twice.
Alas, we have the contradiction. According to the right, Biden is a corrupt mastermind, that was able to rig the 2020 election without a trace and at the same time arm-twist every judge in the land not to side with Trump's attorneys. But at the same time, the right tells us that Biden is also a senile old man who can't tie his own shoes.The important thing to remember is that the audit and all of this talk about "election integrity" is really just a cover for what's really going on: trying to prove the former president's ridiculous premise that the only way he could lose was through election fraud. In the past we haven't had large efforts to vote fraudulently, yet suddenly we're expected to believe there was some massive wave of fraud by people voting twice.
So less irregularities with more mail in ballots? you have to be kidding me, the percentage may drop but the numbers increased. Do you know what chain of custody means? Why can't I get a liberal to admit what we all know, mail in ballots are more susceptible to fraud than in person voting because of the number of people handling the ballots. Doesn't seem that hard to understand except for partisans. A full audit is required but nothing changes the reality there is no justification for no excuse mail in ballots regardless of when they started
I voted early and in person, where did I say that was a problem, the in person issue is THE ISSUE. You want to live your life in fear do it some place else but not at the voting booths. How many people handle a mail in ballot vs an in person ballot? you cannot be this partisan that you cannot grasp that reality the more people handling the ballots the more susceptible they are to fraud.
More susceptible to fraud does not mean that any sort of significant fraud occurred, that even the susceptibility increase is significant in any way. You need to show evidence that significant fraud did occur, not that it could occur.
More susceptible to fraud means exactly that and there is absolutely no justification for able body individuals who don't qualify for an absentee ballot NOT to go to the polls, the entitlement mentality that you seem to have doesn't extend to the polling locations IMO.
I'll go so far as to say nothing will ever happen about it. It's a witch hunt.
If it isn't significant, then it doesn't matter. Since you can't show any fraud actually occurring, you have nothing.