I explained it. WHat part didnt you understand? You are denying support that the child is entitled to by right...because the women exercised her rights. Not to mention that the right to support by both parents is the "child's right".
How do you not understand this? You are penalizing the woman and the child when rights protect both of them.
Who cares what you think? Again, not interested in your judgement, her 1A right is protected, and the judges dont care about your feelings either.
I can differentiate between that...
why do you ignore the fact that no agreement can stop her from having the kid anyway? And when that happens, when there is a child...whatever the parents 'want' is irrelevant...the child's right to support from both parents supersedes the agreement
What's my lie? Be specific?
Here's proof you're wrong. Now...where's your proof disputing it?
Child Support is a statutory right that actually "belongs" to the child. Neither the egg donor nor the sperm donor can "contract out" of their liability under the laws that grant the statutory right to child support.
So anything 'pre-conception' or 'pre-birth' is useless...if there's a child, their statutory right supersedes the contract or law.
"No matter what situation gives rise to the need for child support, it might help to think of the legal right to child support as being possessed by a child (which it technically is), for his or her proper care and upbringing, regardless of who actually receives child support payments.
The fact that the custodial parent has a high income does not itself justify deviation from the guidelines, because under the law children have the right to benefit from both parents' incomes."
Because in the United States nearly half of all marriages end in divorce and almost one-fourth of all children are born to unmarried parents, the regulation of child support is an important social issue. Learn about the basics of child support, and more, at FindLaw's Child Support section.
--also--
A child’s right to receive parental support is inherent and cannot be waived by either party. Regardless of the parents’ relationship with one another (whether married, divorced, separated, or never married), as long as paternity has been established, both parents are on the hook for child support. Regardless of any arrangement—such as “trading” spousal support for child support—both parents still have a legal obligation to support the child.
Can you waive child support in Riverside? If you want an experienced family law attorney on your side, contact Heath Baker Law. Call us for a FREE consult!