- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 69,380
- Reaction score
- 53,805
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Just wondering what everyone thinks of the situation with Saudi Arabia.
Same as always, the sooner we disconnect from our need for their oil, the sooner we extricate ourselves from the geopolitical situation that leaves us dependent upon their position in the region, the better.
How doable is the former? Quite, just keep pushing efficiency and alternatives.
The latter? Extremely difficult as this is a bed largely of our making and the UK's making decades ago.
The problem is, KSA's position is not rock solid, not nearly as much as we thought it has been or think it is.
The West is reluctant to admit that the House of Saud could crumble in the blink of an eye, thanks either to a series of royal failures or rotten intrigues, or thanks to the shifting sands of monarchial politics vis a vis the Saudi people.
Kingdoms, even dynastic ones stretching back centuries, can disappear overnight with little outside warning.
Absolute power is susceptible to absolute destruction by both internal and external forces, and without the moderating effects of parliamentary and democratic processes, and the stability of a republican framework, one can wake up and find that a dynasty has succumbed to the sword in the twinkling of an eye.
American and British exceptionalism preached the gospel that both would eventually have a moderating and civilizing influence on the Kingdom. Well, women can drive now, but aside from that, much is as it was in the 11th century and will remain so.
The termites however, are in for the long game, and they are eating away at the foundations of the House of Saud.