- Joined
- Jun 18, 2013
- Messages
- 46,122
- Reaction score
- 14,554
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
You realize that it has nothing to do with the actual affirmative action laws right?Discriminating Toward Equality: Affirmative Action and the Diversity Charade
On October 15, 2013, the topic of affirmative action once again came before the United States Supreme Court. This time, the debate over race-based preferences came to the Court via Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, a case that challenges Michigan’s constitutional ban on...www.heritage.org
At the time of my application, the university reviewed applications submitted by black, Native American, and Hispanic applicants under one standard and those submitted by everyone else under a much higher standard.[4] The school later claimed to simplify the admissions process by using a point system and automatically awarding an extra 20 points (out of 100) to select minorities. By comparison, a perfect SAT score earned an applicant only 12 points. Thus, even though I had good grades and a host of extracurricular activities, the university rejected my application because I had the wrong skin color. My case, Gratz v. Bollinger,[5] ultimately went before the Supreme Court, and in 2003, the Court ruled that racial discrimination had indeed taken place.
The problem tor the school was that they wanted a diverse student body. But systemic racism being what it is..it made it difficult to find candidates that were minorities..so they tried to make up for systemic racism with their point system.