[W:148]Affidavit In Sidney Powell's Suit Claims Evidence Ties Voting Machines To Iran, China

[GolfingChef]

I posted lengthy quotes from an affidavit in the OP, the affidavit is the topic of the thread. And hardly anyone is even referring to it.

The affidavit is meaningless as it provides no evidence to support the claims

 

[bearpoker]

I await the resurrection of Hugo Chavez by Sidney Powell..........any minute now!

It’s hard to laugh when it’s this pathetic.

No, it's not!

 

[beefheart]

The misspellings were too obvious, in large bold letters at the top of the filing.

She played the liberal media into covering the filing, whereas they otherwise would have ignored it.

A court will determine what is reality, and what is not.

Wait, you think that filing a pile of shit like that with no spacing on sentences, misspellings, and wrong dates is somehow a professional thing to do, and that she "played" the media? What universe is that something to be proud of?

I work with lawyers all the time, I have to read submissions and decisions from judges, if my company's internal lawyers and our outside legal teams ever filed such an awful pile off crap like your whack-a-do Powell did, they would be fired instantly.

You clearly don't understand much about this Reuben, but then again, paid disinfo conspiracy theorists don't care about quality and integrity...

 

[rahl]

The important point here is that Powell is not a member of Trump's legal team.

No, the important part to remember is that Powell, like trump, has zero evidence of fraud.

So no court has heard a single case she has presented. And lol I don't believe that spelling errors "invalidate the complaint," not sure what rabbit ear you pulled that out of.

US law is where I pulled it from. That you don't know these things is why you have no business discussing legal matters.

Biden being my President, or not being my President, is completely unrelated to this topic. If we need Biden to take office in the meantime, it's a separate issue. But that has absolutely no bearing on this case.

It's the central issue of the case. No evidence of fraud has been presented. Not by trump, not by his legal team, not by the incompetent Powell, and not by you.

I posted lengthy quotes from an affidavit in the OP, the affidavit is the topic of the thread. And hardly anyone is even referring to it.

Affidavits are not evidence. They are written accusations.

And I also want to emphasize again, because it's important, that Dominion is innocent until proven guilty.

correct.

 

[BlueTex]

The misspellings were too obvious, in large bold letters at the top of the filing.

She played the liberal media into covering the filing, whereas they otherwise would have ignored it.

A court will determine what is reality, and what is not.

Federal judges do not take kindly to childish games....

 

[ReubenSherr]

US law is where I pulled it from. That you don't know these things is why you have no business discussing legal matters.

It's the central issue of the case. No evidence of fraud has been presented. Not by trump, not by his legal team, not by the incompetent Powell, and not by you.

Affidavits are not evidence. They are written accusations.

correct.

???

Rahl, you have no clue what you're talking about.

Please cite the "US law" that establishes that spelling errors invalidate a case.

And I can't believe you just posted "affidavits are not evidence." They are sworn statements, which are to be presented in court. If the person who has signed the affidavit is lying, especially about a subject as serious as this, they go to jail.

This doesn't mean the affidavit should be accepted as fact. But it is certainly "evidence".

 

[ReubenSherr]

Federal judges do not take kindly to childish games....

I'm assuming it was a draft, but we'll see.

 

[JasperL]

???

I think some of you are in denial.

Yes, this case was filed in Georgia and Michigan. And it has nothing to do with Guiliani, Ellis, or public hearings at hotels. Which is to Powell's advantage.

Another thing to note is the following quote from Jair Bonsalao, President of Brazil.

"On Sunday, Jair Bolsonaro told reporters he thinks it’s wise to allow President Trump’s legal arguments to go through in court before congratulating a winner.

He also said there is evidence of widespread voting fraud, though he added he’s not sure whether it was enough to sway the election.

“It is one of those countries that is the ‘mother of democracy,'” Bolsonaro stated. “Now, the media does not report on this but I have my sources of information. It’s no use talking to you, they won’t disclose it, but there was a lot of fraud there.”

He also criticized his own country’s voting system by saying it would be much more secure if it switched back to paper ballots."

Bolsonaro?

 

[j brown's body]

Thats

Affidavit in Sidney Powell's Suit Claims Evidence Ties Vote Machines to Iran, China

Affidavit in Sidney Powell's Suit Claims Evidence Ties Vote Machines to Iran, China

www.kabc.com

"An analysis by a onetime military intelligence analyst whose name was redacted in an affidavit with lawyer attorney Sidney Powell’s lawsuit against Michigan officials insists there’s “unambiguous evidence” that Dominion Voter Systems servers were accessible to and were “compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China.”

According to reporting by The Epoch Times, Powell’s complaint, filed Wednesday against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and the Board of State Canvassers, cites the affidavit as representing a former electronic intelligence analyst and supporting claims that “the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent US general election in 2020.”

The analyst, who allegedly claimed to have “extensive experience as a white hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world,” said that they scanned Dominion network nodes and found a number of interrelationships with foreign entities, including access to Dominion’s server by a network from Hunan, China. Another review is said to have confirmed links to an Iranian IP address."

Thats a nifty coincidence.

 

[BlueTex]

I'm assuming it was a draft, but we'll see.

It's what was filed with the court... You ASSUME wrong...

 

[ReubenSherr]

Alright, well here is the affidavit. I'm ticked off that I started this thread, and there's no discussion of the actual content of the affidavit.

If anyone, liberal, conservative, whatever, could actually discuss the affidavit, which will be presented in Court, I think it's pretty important.

"An analysis by a onetime military intelligence analyst whose name was redacted in an affidavit with lawyer attorney Sidney Powell’s lawsuit against Michigan officials insists there’s “unambiguous evidence” that Dominion Voter Systems servers were accessible to and were “compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China.”

According to reporting by The Epoch Times, Powell’s complaint, filed Wednesday against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and the Board of State Canvassers, cites the affidavit as representing a former electronic intelligence analyst and supporting claims that “the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent US general election in 2020.”

The analyst, who allegedly claimed to have “extensive experience as a white hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world,” said that they scanned Dominion network nodes and found a number of interrelationships with foreign entities, including access to Dominion’s server by a network from Hunan, China. Another review is said to have confirmed links to an Iranian IP address."

 

[rahl]

???

Rahl, you have no clue what you're talking about.

Please cite the "US law" that establishes that spelling errors invalidate a case.

2010 California Code :: Code of Civil Procedure :: Chapter 8. Variance--mistakes In Pleadings And Amendments

law.justia.com

And I can't believe you just posted "affidavits are not evidence." They are sworn statements, which are to be presented in court. If the person who has signed the affidavit is lying, especially about a subject as serious as this, they go to jail.

It doesn't matter how many times you repeat this. An affidavit is not evidence. It is a written accusation.

This doesn't mean the affidavit should be accepted as fact. But it is certainly "evidence".

it is not. It is an allegation written on paper. It's the same as an allegation spoken aloud.

 

[Ikari]

It's what was filed with the court... You ASSUME wrong...

Well you know what they say about assuming.

lol

But all this is still nothing more than insane conspiracy theory nonsense. It's time for folk to give it up, get over it, Trump lost, there was no stolen election. There was no fraud. In a couple weeks the EC will vote and Biden has 306 Electorals. That's it. done and done. Moving on.

 

[rahl]

Alright, well here is the affidavit. I'm ticked off that I started this thread, and there's no discussion of the actual content of the affidavit.

If anyone, liberal, conservative, whatever, could actually discuss the affidavit, which will be presented in Court, I think it's pretty important.

"An analysis by a onetime military intelligence analyst whose name was redacted in an affidavit with lawyer attorney Sidney Powell’s lawsuit against Michigan officials insists there’s “unambiguous evidence” that Dominion Voter Systems servers were accessible to and were “compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China.”

According to reporting by The Epoch Times, Powell’s complaint, filed Wednesday against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and the Board of State Canvassers, cites the affidavit as representing a former electronic intelligence analyst and supporting claims that “the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent US general election in 2020.”

The analyst, who allegedly claimed to have “extensive experience as a white hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world,” said that they scanned Dominion network nodes and found a number of interrelationships with foreign entities, including access to Dominion’s server by a network from Hunan, China. Another review is said to have confirmed links to an Iranian IP address."

It's been discussed. The affidavit is not evidence of anything, it is a written allegation. Powell has provided zero evidence of fraud. Someone else alleging in a written statement that fraud might have took place, is not evidence.

 

[Ikari]

Alright, well here is the affidavit. I'm ticked off that I started this thread, and there's no discussion of the actual content of the affidavit.

If anyone, liberal, conservative, whatever, could actually discuss the affidavit, which will be presented in Court, I think it's pretty important.

"An analysis by a onetime military intelligence analyst whose name was redacted in an affidavit with lawyer attorney Sidney Powell’s lawsuit against Michigan officials insists there’s “unambiguous evidence” that Dominion Voter Systems servers were accessible to and were “compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China.”

According to reporting by The Epoch Times, Powell’s complaint, filed Wednesday against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and the Board of State Canvassers, cites the affidavit as representing a former electronic intelligence analyst and supporting claims that “the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent US general election in 2020.”

The analyst, who allegedly claimed to have “extensive experience as a white hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world,” said that they scanned Dominion network nodes and found a number of interrelationships with foreign entities, including access to Dominion’s server by a network from Hunan, China. Another review is said to have confirmed links to an Iranian IP address."

You're upset that people are giving your inane Conspiracy Theory the time of day?
lol
I'm sure there's some "affidavit" It doesn't prove anything, there's nothing there that shows that this election was tampered with and everything from the recounts to the agencies in charge say that there was no significant fraud taking place. But sure...this affidavit is so different from the others in the 30 some odd cases that have already been tossed out of court. This one...this one is the smoking gun, yes?
lol
No one gives a **** about your Putin News. We're over it. Trump lost. Time to move on, gotta worry about the shit Biden is going to start doing, not worry about how badly Trump actually lost.

 

[bearpoker]

You cannot take a hint lol.

There is an affidavit posted in the OP.

I don't give a shit about my credibility, refer to the affidavit in the OP.

It was written under penalty of perjury, if he is lying, he goes to jail.

When the case is thrown out will you finally desist or are you running with this forever?

 

[Rexedgar]

I'm assuming it was a draft, but we'll see.

Was the Georgia complaint a “draft’ or an “intentional act” to garner attention?

Hard to keep the lies straight, eh?

 

[JasperL]

The misspellings were too obvious, in large bold letters at the top of the filing.

She played the liberal media into covering the filing, whereas they otherwise would have ignored it.

A court will determine what is reality, and what is not.

The 'liberal media' covered her obvious incompetence and laughed at her silly lawsuit.

I read it and the so-called 'affidavit' and couldn't find a provable claim of fraud anywhere. The affidavit is a joke. There's no way this was prepared with a serious intent to persuade any court. It's devoid of provable claims, and makes wild leaps of logic. One of them was too many absentee ballots during some time period went for Biden, but that's his ignorant hack opinion, and not a factual claim. How does he know that Biden couldn't have gotten 80% of some block or blocks of absentee ballots, cast in heavily Democratic areas? He doesn't. Etc....

 

[roguenuke]

???

I think some of you are in denial.

Yes, this case was filed in Georgia and Michigan. And it has nothing to do with Guiliani, Ellis, or public hearings at hotels. Which is to Powell's advantage.

Another thing to note is the following quote from Jair Bonsalao, President of Brazil.

"On Sunday, Jair Bolsonaro told reporters he thinks it’s wise to allow President Trump’s legal arguments to go through in court before congratulating a winner.

He also said there is evidence of widespread voting fraud, though he added he’s not sure whether it was enough to sway the election.

“It is one of those countries that is the ‘mother of democracy,'” Bolsonaro stated. “Now, the media does not report on this but I have my sources of information. It’s no use talking to you, they won’t disclose it, but there was a lot of fraud there.”

He also criticized his own country’s voting system by saying it would be much more secure if it switched back to paper ballots."

Then why does it include an affidavit filed by Russ Ramsland, that Giuliani mentioned in his press conference a couple weeks ago? Are you saying that Giuliani had no clue what he was talking about when he mentioned "Well, in Michigan and Wisconsin, we have over-votes in numerous precincts of 150 percent, 200 percent and 300 percent." during that press conference at the RNC? That info is from Ramsland's highly flawed affidavit that was filed with these suits. It was even filed with the one in Georgia to try to show evidence for some claim in the lawsuit about overvotes in Georgia.

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

16.Additionally, incontrovertible evidence Board of Elections records demonstrates that at least 96,600 absentee ballots were requested and counted but were never recorded as being returned to county election boardsby the voter. Thus, at a minimum, 96,600 votes must be disregarded. (See Attached hereto, Exh. 9, R. Ramsland Aff.)

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.7.1_2.pdf

As for Brazil's President, why exactly should we listen to him rather than our own cybersecurity experts saying this election was fair and the most secure in history? Sounds like he holds pretty similar political views to Trump.

Jair Bolsonaro - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Ikari]

When the case is thrown out will you finally desist or are you running with this forever?

I think some of the hardcore Cultists are going to be running forever. Or at least for 4 more years. Whenever Biden does anything, we'll hear the "...but he's not the legitimate President" style line. For at least 4 years.

 

[Ikari]

Then why does it include an affidavit filed by Russ Ramsland, that Giuliani mentioned in his press conference a couple weeks ago? Are you saying that Giuliani had no clue what he was talking about when he mentioned "Well, in Michigan and Wisconsin, we have over-votes in numerous precincts of 150 percent, 200 percent and 300 percent." during that press conference at the RNC? That info is from Ramsland's highly flawed affidavit that was filed with these suits. It was even filed with the one in Georgia to try to show evidence for some claim in the lawsuit about overvotes in Georgia.

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.7.1_2.pdf

As for Brazil's President, why exactly should we listen to him rather than our own cybersecurity experts saying this election was fair and the most secure in history? Sounds like he holds pretty similar political views to Trump.

Jair Bolsonaro - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

....does Giuliani have any clue what he's talking about these days? Because it seems like maybe he doesn't.

 

[BlueTex]

Was the Georgia complaint a “draft’ or an “intentional act” to garner attention?

Hard to keep the lies straight, eh?

The only to see is the filing marks at the top of first page...

 

[Ikari]

The only to see is the filing marks at the top of first page...

View attachment 67306860

Yeah, shouldn't let Putin run Spell Check for ya.

 

[bearpoker]

The misspellings were too obvious, in large bold letters at the top of the filing.

She played the liberal media into covering the filing, whereas they otherwise would have ignored it.

A court will determine what is reality, and what is not.

So the misspellings were a brilliant move. Really? She's been hyping this case for weeks. There's no chance that the media would ignore it if it was professionally presented. It's too sensational for that. In a court case, it's more important to impress the judge than to entertain the press.

 

[Lord Tammerlain]

Alright, well here is the affidavit. I'm ticked off that I started this thread, and there's no discussion of the actual content of the affidavit.

If anyone, liberal, conservative, whatever, could actually discuss the affidavit, which will be presented in Court, I think it's pretty important.

"An analysis by a onetime military intelligence analyst whose name was redacted in an affidavit with lawyer attorney Sidney Powell’s lawsuit against Michigan officials insists there’s “unambiguous evidence” that Dominion Voter Systems servers were accessible to and were “compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China.”

According to reporting by The Epoch Times, Powell’s complaint, filed Wednesday against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and the Board of State Canvassers, cites the affidavit as representing a former electronic intelligence analyst and supporting claims that “the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent US general election in 2020.”

The analyst, who allegedly claimed to have “extensive experience as a white hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world,” said that they scanned Dominion network nodes and found a number of interrelationships with foreign entities, including access to Dominion’s server by a network from Hunan, China. Another review is said to have confirmed links to an Iranian IP address."

So the analyst had his name redacted, why would he do that?

Does he not support the affidavit anymore? Is he concerned that if he left his name on it he would be called to court and be subject to penalty for either lying on the affidavit or in court?