Accept what? your speculative claim that what you decide is a contradiction is a true contradiction?
Your attempts to move the goal-posts fail. I sure hope you didn't hurt your back.
A contradiction, by definition, is true.
We cannot help but notice that you are unable, unwilling or incapable of actually addressing the issue, and instead deflect.
We have what we have, if your way of dealing with God's word is to fabricate claims of it being littered, swamped in contradictions and then by extension reject it because contradictory documents cannot contain truth, then do so, that's your line of reasoning and fine, it isn't mine.
I did not fabricate what your god-thing said.
You'll need to show evidence, solid evidence to support the belief you have of "lies and deception" regarding the genealogies.
What I'm hearing is that you are afraid to investigate the matter yourself. The real Sherlock Holmes would be spinning in his grave.
Or, perhaps the issue is you lack the skills to understand what you read?
The proof is in the gospels themselves.
Matthew says Joseph was descended of David's son Solomon.
Luke contradicts by saying that Joseph was descended of David's son Nathan.
Those are, in your own words, "true contradictions" because you cannot be descended simultaneously from your grandfather and your granduncle (although I suspect in your world you probably could since it would be, um, you known, a "miracle").
Worse still, Matthew says Joseph's father was Jacob, while Luke contradicts and says Joseph's father was Heli.
Naturally, you're totally frightened and won't address either of those points and instead you'll attack me, even though I'm just the messenger.
