LMAO! Oh thank you! That's great! You are telling me to shut up (again) because I'm a woman and have made you look bad. Not only have I proven you wrong and pointed out your gross sin, I am a woman! You have been corrected and your sin brought to light by a woman! Sad but apparently this means you believe you are 'less than a woman,' since I've out-thought and out-taught you.
You-plural start from the
a priori that anyone who rigorously defends theological truths ‘looks bad’, because such things are just not done in polite company. No one who does so starts from a point of ‘looking good’ therefore.
Note that I see nothing approaching ‘gross sin’ in anything SH says. And I admit to being confused by your constant references to Christian categories, even the use of the phrase Word of God, sin, and other terms that indicate some level of belief. Yet here you are working hand in hand with people who advocate an atheistic position. It really does not make sense.
Quite some time back I thought this was made clear: you obviously have no right and no authority to teach anyone anything about Christian ideas, Christian theology, and possibly Christian values. This is revealed
by what you say. Non one condemned you, you self-condemned.
I would not ever tell you, or anyone, to *shut up*, and no one told you the same, but within Christian categories, which are agreed upon categories of value, you obviously are confused and mis-directed. If you ever did write out a complete idea — you never do — I am pretty sure the thinking-errors would manifest themselves, as they did just recenly with David.
I think this is a safe and a fair comment.
It is in
no sense a sin to attempt to a) define solid theological values & truths, b) to define and then defend what is true against what is false, partially true or a lie — in fact very much the opposite. So it is very hard to know exactly how to act today When disbelief and open opposition/rebellion to some of the Christian mandates are so prevalent.
You are damned if you do & damned if you don’t! to put it colloquially.
But it is true that some people, for reasons that can be discovered, simply do not want to hear it and often will not hear it.
My final comment in regard to this is that Christianity represents a special category within all the religions we might name. It is unique, it is singular. And it merits, therefore, a special defense. But obviously I speak as a believer and one inclined to *traditional categories of understanding*.
I have read many of your posts and I see you as offering
no substantial service to any Christian category, concept or notion that I can recognize.