[W:139]Corsi: I lied and I'm ready to Die in Jail

[MrShangles]

I referred you to the timeline of the investigation.
Find the entry that shows that it all started with Comey's supposedly illegally obtained information, and show me why that information was classified, bearing in mind that Comey is or was FBI, hence law enforcement.

You do understand that law enforcement isn't bound by the rules on classified information the same way you and I are, yes?

Ok you’re right and I’m wrong, law enforcement can just give classified information to whoever they want to as long as it’s against Trump.
Any way why doesn’t the super law enforcement that doesn’t have to follow rules just ask Assange how he got the information, he said no one has ever asked him.
Plus I would like to thank you for having a debate without name calling, it’s not the normal here, but we can agree to disagree.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

Ok you’re right and I’m wrong, law enforcement can just give classified information to whoever they want to as long as it’s against Trump.
Any way why doesn’t the super law enforcement that doesn’t have to follow rules just ask Assange how he got the information, he said no one has ever asked him.
Plus I would like to thank you for having a debate without name calling, it’s not the normal here, but we can agree to disagree.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You still haven't proven it was classified, only that Trump THINKS it's classified.
Still waiting for Comey to be charged and convicted. Any day now.

As for name calling, your snide remark about thinking you had to "slow things down for me" is more than a bit condescending, but I'm not about to get all butt-hurt because someone feels smug.

Once anybody determines that Comey illegally accessed classified information in a criminal manner, I assure you there's no shortage of Comey hating Trump loving Republicans who will put him on trial and send him to the pokey.

Or not. Till then, it boils down to Trump having dinner with the guy, demanding his unswerving loyalty, and Comey rightly thinking that such demands aren't kosher for a Prezzy to ask of a top law enforcement head, and sharing his observations.

Classified my butt.
Lastly, it appears that Trump's people either DID break into people's devices, or did business with people who did, and then lied about it, then ordered their people to lie to Congress about it some more.

Obstruction of justice, so many instances that I don't think I can keep count.
You're conservative? I got NO beef with that.

But as a conservative, you should be troubled by this stuff.
I know that, as a liberal, I am.

 

[MrShangles]

Well, as of this writing, twenty-five minutes have passed since Mr. Shangles implied that the entire Comey-Mueller investigation is invalid and unusable because, according to him, Comey illegally leaked a memo to the press, about a conversation with Trump concerning Comey's "loyalty" rating, and that it all started with Comey's leak to begin with.

He then went on to compare me illegally accessing HIS (Shangles) devices to the head of the FBI leaking a conversation memo, something for which Comey has yet to be criminally charged for. (wonder why)

And now he's on radio silence. But he thinks he needs to slow things down for me. :lamo

Maybe I spoke to soon, you’re just like the rest of the liberals here.
No one knows the real truth of any of this, you don’t know, I don’t know, you’re liberal friends don’t know, my conservative friends don’t know.
We all have our own opinions about the situation.
You’re opinion doesn’t have anymore merit then mine, but for some reason you think you have all the answers, maybe one day if Mueller stops going after tax crimes, lying crimes he can finish up his investigation.
Comey has yet to be charged, Trump has yet to be charged.
And I was, oh never mind thanks for the debate!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

I.love how they replaced all those old newspapers with the birth announcement.

Yeah? Cool.

Now produce the original birth certificate. Hasn't been done yet. Why, if one is curious, if intelligent, one would wonder. Do you wonder?

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

Geez....you people are an embarrassment. Ignorant Birthers are the same as the ignorant segregationists and the ignorant McCartyites of the past. They will remain with us until they die, and then they will be succeeded by the next generation of haters and bigots. Of course, Obama produced his birth certificate (both short and long forms), something that no other candidate or president has ever been asked to do.

The entire birther movement was predicated upon a racist lie, from the very beginning. It was just an elaborate scheme to appeal to the sentiments of bigots and racists who hated Barack Obama for reasons that they were too cowardly to profess publicly. The only people who did not understand that being born to his Kansas-born mother was the only thing he needed to be a U.S. citizen....were gutless, ignorant fake news bigots and racists.




LOL, nonsense. Obama was "divisive" to Americans with racial resentment "issues". That's it. He did nothing to "divide", other than exist and serve honorably as the only POTUS since the 19th century to serve 2 complete terms without a single major (i.e. legitimate) ethical or moral scandal. He was, quite literally, the modern-day Jackie Robinson of American presidential politics. Unfortunately, most of his most fervent detractors were motivated by the darker forces of human nature.

Well, go ahead, show us what he showed, you know, to embarrass me.

Are you in any manner aware of all the obvious faults in the supposed birth certificates already produced? I doubt it, we have so many voluntarily blind that think they have super knowledge powers.

I know, hilarious.

How old are you? One would have had to be about 1-3 years old not to have cognitively witnessed, gone through all the racist missteps of the slenderman administration, the stupid foul ups that slenderman shat then himself stepped in. For instances, the Prof. Gates stupidity, the Trayvon Martin idiocy and bigotry, the Michael Smith lie and debacle, the Freddie Gray riots, the order for the DOJ to spike the conviction of the New Black Panthers for undeniable election intimidation tactics...

Stepped in when he should not have, stepped in too soon before the information was available and was wrong on each. He was an empty suit, an incompetent.

Yep...slenderman was the ultimate divider in chief.

And its a little overlapping on the racist side to call the birther controversy to be ultimately based upon racism. We the people have a right to know who we are electing, the legitimate facts, we have the right to wonder why they are hiding certain facts and the right to get to the bottom of what is going on. That those that are blind choose to remain blind, well that is up to them. The rest of us have our own rights... and as an American we can demand to know the truth.

We clear here?

I agree with you on his mother being American so he is American... unless he changed or disavowed his citizenship. Something is being hidden and I am one of the curious, one of the inquisitive intelligent that would like to have the answers.

Its American and you choose to remain blind, but why advertise the fact of being so incurious?

Jesus, you folks are so easily led. NOBODY, at least nobody in the slenderman misadministration, WAS EVER GOING TO BE PROPERLY INVESTIGATED much less charged under either a Lynch or Holder, the ONLY AG in our history to be charged with contempt of Congress refusing to turn over incriminating documents when they, Congress, were investigating the Fast and Furious gun running...in charge of such. No real investigation of Lois Lerner or her lying under oath IRS director, Koskinen...nor did we ever really get to the bottom of the disgusting misadministration of the Benghazi second 9-11 debacle.

Add to that the many members of the slenderman misadmin who will be charged for spying on the Trump campaign, traitorous subverting the FISA courts, lying under oath, conspiracy, who knows what else we will find out that they underhandedly carried out. Yeah, the next two years should be fun with Trump having the goods on so many and they feebly try to strike back through the House bogus investigations coming under the dim Dems.

Trump will make sure its entertaining and I would not bet against him coming out on top.

BTW, the only thing that slenderman and Robinson share is that slenderman was half Robinson's race.

That's it, that's all.

 

[Mach]

I am one of the curious, one of the inquisitive intelligent l.

Stable genius, conspiracy theory nutter, they are all just synonyms for the same attributes. Trump is the perfect pick for you.

A republican senate and house couldn't investigate Obama after all those years of trying? Aww, I suppose the Democrats in the House in January will just have to show them how it's done.

 

[What if...?]

Yeah? Cool.

Now produce the original birth certificate. Hasn't been done yet. Why, if one is curious, if intelligent, one would wonder. Do you wonder?

I don't have my original birth certificate.

But I got a passport with a copy...

How do you get the original? I thought that was a public record kind of thing. Kept in some record keeping place in Tennessee (for me).

So I could get a copy.

So I could get a passport.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

Most people realize that back before the 1970's, not every state did such a fantastic job of preserving the original handwritten hard copy of the paper birth certificate, opting instead to migrate them into a computerized entry that produced a certified representation OF that original paper certificate, and that is what almost EVERY SINGLE PERSON born in the State of Hawaii prior to the 1970's wound up with, with very rare exceptions.

The State records office entered the data, produced a new computer version, affixed the official Seal of the State of Hawaii and that served as the original.

The birthers, in their supreme idiocy, refuse to accept these facts, and therefore anyone and almost everyone born in that state prior to the 1970's could be declared as non-Americans by them, due to the fact that they too will not be able to produce an original dog-eared handwritten paper copy of their Birth Certificate but instead must use the computerized certified copy.

Hawaii, of course, is not the only state to have done this, so birthers will have their hands full in attempts to decertify the natural citizenship of millions of Americans. But of course, only ONE specific person interests them, a BLACK MAN who is a Democrat.

But watch this space because the next time a Democrat runs for President, if they hail from a state that used the same approach as Hawaii, the birther conspiracy might again raise its idiotic head, perhaps even if the candidate is white, or female.
If they are Republican, chances are the birthers will overlook this anomaly.

It might be amusing, however, if liberals suddenly jump on the birther bandwagon instead, should a Republican from one of these states decides to run.

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

Stable genius, conspiracy theory nutter, they are all just synonyms for the same attributes. Trump is the perfect pick for you.

A republican senate and house couldn't investigate Obama after all those years of trying? Aww, I suppose the Democrats in the House in January will just have to show them how it's done.

I have no doubt they, your totally corrupt team of Democrats will do just that and Trump will have to do what Trump will have to do.

The weakness, the failure of the establishment types in Congress, the Ryans, the Flakes, the McCains on our side, all not standing up for equal justice, your whole side, that are traitors to their party [ both parties were originally patriotic ] and, ultimately, traitors to our country will be in the history books ... to their shame.

Trump has kept his powder dry, waiting until he, we all can see the darkness, the two-tiered justice, the corrupt evil in their eyes. You may well call me and others like me names, ad hom it all you want, you won't even admit the truth to yourself.

The Stalinist Alinsky style tactics are very simply unpatriotic, UNAMERICAN. Democrats have proven themselves to be at one with the Soviet show trialers of old. You folks have an allegiance to a greater, to you folks higher cause, worldwide socialism under the mantle of elitist globalism [authoritarianism under whichever, or all, the labels we find overlap...communism, fascism, corporatism... all of the deep leftist origin ].

At least we now know, the evidence is that stark, that its a fight to the death and good ALWAYS eventually wins. If not there is no real America remaining. We have heard the death rattle of the traitors in your party... and you folks continue to follow them, so you folks are the declared enemy of my country.

I hold back no longer in calling the truth as the truth. You folks have outgrown our handling with kids gloves. Your side's ambition, whether you personally, individually have the capacity to understand the concept or not, is to destroy our values and thus our nation.

Good folks don't have to wear kid gloves when that realization is apparent. I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. With that Trump will do what is necessary to triumph over the obvious traitors to our great nation.

But go ahead, continue to whip out just the ad homs so that you can virtue signal to all your unconscious pals here. You can't handle the reality of the evidence since you cannot counter it with a big enough lie that we will all believe. So you attack character and falsely attribute mal motive... you have no other ammunition.

 

[Aberration]

LOL, you see no problem, huh?

And you think that matters? Who cares what you think?

El oh el, you see a problem huh?

You think that matters? Who cares what you think?

There are federal election and campaign laws which make very clear that working with a foreign government to advantage your own campaign....is very much a "problem".

No ****. We got election laws? Which ones specifically are you concerned with?

What are you taking about? Nothing revealed here even hints that the Trump campaign was working with a foreign government to further the campaign.

"Crooked", huh? Ah...I see now. You're one of "those" types. :roll:

Oh no. One of those types. You got me.

I get it now. Like most Trump acolytes, you believe Hillary was guilty of crimes...even though 7 or 8 REPUBLICAN lead investigations concluded otherwise....even though a REPUBLICAN FBI Director (Comey) concluded othewise. Conversely, you "see no problem with the Trump campaign getting emails" from a foreign source, even though there that constitutes a direct violation of federal campaign laws.

Alice, welcome to Wonderland.

Indeed. That’s quite a fantastical tale you tell.

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

I don't have my original birth certificate.

But I got a passport with a copy...

How do you get the original? I thought that was a public record kind of thing. Kept in some record keeping place in Tennessee (for me).

So I could get a copy.

So I could get a passport.

All good questions.

My impression, as I am no expert on the matter, is that it is done different state by state. I, personally, do not question at least his initial citizenship. His mother was an American for gosh sakes.

With it being stipulated that slenderman has not released many of his early records, for instance, his Columbia transcripts... why? It does not add up after all these years. It cannot be because maybe he made poor grades, who would care at this late date? As it would/could be inspirational if one could show that deficit and yet come back to become president of the USA after overcoming such obstacles.

Poor grades, however, would not seem the culprit in any event as he got into Harvard Law... so what's the holdup?

Something is odd, fishy at the minimum. There are also so many other quirky coincidences that don't match up. The fact that twins born the day after him in the same hospital were given lower birth certificate numbers. Then a forensic examination of the document released only brought up more questions unanswered.

So, it is a valid question that curious individuals ponder and that has yet to be answered in a manner that sufficiently settles the dispute. I have no dog in the citizenship debate, only came to wonder why all the subterfuge and wrangling over what should be an open and shut proposition.

All the after birthers complain and yet have no true answers, just a willingness to confirm their own bias and shrug it off as nothing as their curiousity and appetite for truth are, obviously, much lower than my own.

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

Most people realize that back before the 1970's, not every state did such a fantastic job of preserving the original handwritten hard copy of the paper birth certificate, opting instead to migrate them into a computerized entry that produced a certified representation OF that original paper certificate, and that is what almost EVERY SINGLE PERSON born in the State of Hawaii prior to the 1970's wound up with, with very rare exceptions.

The State records office entered the data, produced a new computer version, affixed the official Seal of the State of Hawaii and that served as the original.

The birthers, in their supreme idiocy, refuse to accept these facts, and therefore anyone and almost everyone born in that state prior to the 1970's could be declared as non-Americans by them, due to the fact that they too will not be able to produce an original dog-eared handwritten paper copy of their Birth Certificate but instead must use the computerized certified copy.

Hawaii, of course, is not the only state to have done this, so birthers will have their hands full in attempts to decertify the natural citizenship of millions of Americans. But of course, only ONE specific person interests them, a BLACK MAN who is a Democrat.

But watch this space because the next time a Democrat runs for President, if they hail from a state that used the same approach as Hawaii, the birther conspiracy might again raise its idiotic head, perhaps even if the candidate is white, or female.
If they are Republican, chances are the birthers will overlook this anomaly.

It might be amusing, however, if liberals suddenly jump on the birther bandwagon instead, should a Republican from one of these states decides to run.

You know that is not a full accounting of the problem, and yet you pawn it off as such.

How about answer this also, is the race baiting a game or vocation? Race baiting [Merriam Webster] the unfair use of statements about race to try to influence the actions or attitudes of a particular group of people.

Is finding out the truth a race issue to you? You are supremely contradictory on the matter as, after making it a race issue [who would've ever guessed a lefty MIGHT do that, eh?] you then go on to say it might be used "even if the candidate is white, or female." Wow, trying hard to get two slaps in the face of fellow Americans for the price of one...

If not caught and called on it anyhow.

You have absolutely NO interest or curiosity in sincerely learning the truth. You merely have an agenda as is purely displayed in the race-baiting aspect of the post.

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

I agree, we would need proof to remove him from office. But as a matter of practicality, I think we all know with with as much certainty as one can have that he is lying when he said he had no idea about that meeting. Or that he had no idea that Roger Stone was trying to contact Wikileaks. That dog don't hunt. Even his supporters know he's lying even if they won't admit it.

"We all know"?

Based on what, an opposition media that tries to paint that exact picture with the same absence of ANY proof? This is America, bro, we don't do the Soviet Show Trial kinda stuff here. Better get better dogs so you can hunt better.

Yano?

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

Almost none of his actions seem like that of an innocent man.

Not quite how we do it here in the land of the free. Yano?

 

[Mach]

I hold back no longer in calling the truth as the truth. You folks have outgrown our handling with kids gloves. Your side's ambition, whether you personally, individually have the capacity to understand the concept or not, is to destroy our values and thus our nation. Good folks don't have to wear kid gloves when that realization is apparent. I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. With that Trump will do what is necessary to triumph over the obvious traitors to our great nation. But go ahead, continue to whip out just the ad homs so that you can virtue signal to all your unconscious pals here. You can't handle the reality of the evidence since you cannot counter it with a big enough lie that we will all believe. So you attack character and falsely attribute mal motive... you have no other ammunition.

Where did I ever claim you had character? Stop lying and attacking me, while calming it's bad to attack people. It's absurd. If you want to ramble on about how I'm so wrong and bad, that's fine. But don't simultaneous claim it's wrong to do that, it's just too stupid to take seriously.

You're right you're not wearing kid gloves. To me it looks like someone is wearing a straight-jacket. Keep swinging, they are out to get you! Don't worry, the room is padded, it's hard to get hurt in there.

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

Where did I ever claim you had character? Stop lying and attacking me, while calming it's bad to attack people. It's absurd. If you want to ramble on about how I'm so wrong and bad, that's fine. But don't simultaneous claim it's wrong to do that, it's just too stupid to take seriously.

You're right you're not wearing kid gloves. To me it looks like someone is wearing a straight-jacket. Keep swinging, they are out to get you! Don't worry, the room is padded, it's hard to get hurt in there.

Funny/strange...I never said anything specifically about ya, bro... but now that you are admitting it I guess we all most certainly must agree with your inclusion conclusion.

Besides, you having had nothing but ad homs, there surely was no MEAT to attack. I put some of my own relish in with your many yellow mustturds on that raggily-ass bun, jammed it right back down your throat like a meatless hot dog should.

See what it tastes like, do ya? You folks dish these meatless ad hom concoctions up like cheap fast food... except nobody is buying.

 

[roughdraft274]

"We all know"?

Based on what, an opposition media that tries to paint that exact picture with the same absence of ANY proof? This is America, bro, we don't do the Soviet Show Trial kinda stuff here. Better get better dogs so you can hunt better.

Yano?

The president is holding rallies around the country and putting up memes on twitter about throwing his political rivals in jail. If you think that a person on a debate forum saying that the president is lying when he says something that's an obvious lie is the thing we really need to worry about then you need to reevaluate your priorities.

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

Well, as of this writing, twenty-five minutes have passed since Mr. Shangles implied that the entire Comey-Mueller investigation is invalid and unusable because, according to him, Comey illegally leaked a memo to the press, about a conversation with Trump concerning Comey's "loyalty" rating, and that it all started with Comey's leak to begin with.

He then went on to compare me illegally accessing HIS (Shangles) devices to the head of the FBI leaking a conversation memo, something for which Comey has yet to be criminally charged for. (wonder why)

And now he's on radio silence. But he thinks he needs to slow things down for me. :lamo

Well, as of this writing, 3 hours and five minutes have passed since I replied to your post...

Radio silence too, is it?

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

The president is holding rallies around the country and putting up memes on twitter about throwing his political rivals in jail. If you think that a person on a debate forum saying that the president is lying when he says something that's an obvious lie is the thing we really need to worry about then you need to reevaluate your priorities.

You are conflating, stick to the subject and that which I specifically was addressing why don't you?

Talk about this, remember this: "I think we all know with with as much certainty as one can have that he is lying when he said he had no idea about that meeting. Or that he had no idea that Roger Stone was trying to contact Wikileaks."

All the rest is pure deflection and we both understand it.

You see, in this country, the United States of America, we convict on EVIDENCE, not faulty accusations that you just want so much to believe you are almost wetting your pants you want them to be true. Its just not that hard to understand.

But babies often do cry until they get what they want. You folks can wail away forever I guess, annoying as it is... it still is a free country despite y'all.

 

[roughdraft274]

You are conflating, stick to the subject and that which I specifically was addressing why don't you?

Talk about this, remember this: "I think we all know with with as much certainty as one can have that he is lying when he said he had no idea about that meeting. Or that he had no idea that Roger Stone was trying to contact Wikileaks."

All the rest is pure deflection and we both understand it.

You see, in this country, the United States of America, we convict on EVIDENCE, not faulty accusations that you just want so much to believe you are almost wetting your pants you want them to be true. Its just not that hard to understand.

But babies often do cry until they get what they want. You folks can wail away forever I guess, annoying as it is... it still is a free country despite y'all.

Why are you explaining that we convict on evidence when I clearly stated that in the post?

I agree, we would need proof to remove him from office. But as a matter of practicality,...

You are arguing against something I never said. And accusing me of deflection, lol.

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

Why are you explaining that we convict on evidence when I clearly stated that in the post?



You are arguing against something I never said. And accusing me of deflection, lol.

Oh come on, you arent bright but you arent that stupid... you know we were both talking about in the court of public opinion... and you were trying to say, well you did say,

"But as a matter of practicality, I think we all know with with as much certainty as one can have that he is lying when he said he had no idea about that meeting. Or that he had no idea that Roger Stone was trying to contact Wikileaks."

Actually if we had any evidence, and we dont, we could have A LOT MORE CERTAINTY than your mere wishes, hopes and wet dreams that it were true. You have nothing to hide behind but your desire... if you were wearing only that in a public park you would get arrested for indecent exposure.

You are deflecting again.

 

[Mach]

Funny/strange...I never said anything specifically about ya, bro... but now that you are admitting it I guess we all most certainly must agree with your inclusion conclusion.
Besides, you having had nothing but ad homs, there surely was no MEAT to attack. I put some of my own relish in with your many yellow mustturds on that raggily-ass bun, jammed it right back down your throat like a meatless hot dog should.
See what it tastes like, do ya? You folks dish these meatless ad hom concoctions up like cheap fast food... except nobody is buying.

I have no idea what you're writing. It looks like you are saying earnestly, pleading with me, that you are in fact wearing big-boy pants. But Gaug, big-boys don't need to tell the world they are wearing big-boy pants. You claim you're taking off kid-gloves, but it sounds more like out of diapers and into training underwear. Don't get me wrong, it's a big step, a milestone for toddlers to be sure, but it's still got a way to go.

Here is a single, flacid paragraph you flopped out into the world:

NOBODY, at least nobody in the slenderman misadministration, WAS EVER GOING TO BE PROPERLY INVESTIGATED much less charged under either a Lynch or Holder, the ONLY AG in our history to be charged with contempt of Congress refusing to turn over incriminating documents when they, Congress, were investigating the Fast and Furious gun running...in charge of such. No real investigation of Lois Lerner or her lying under oath IRS director, Koskinen...nor did we ever really get to the bottom of the disgusting misadministration of the Benghazi second 9-11 debacle.

Still in diapers:
- referring to Obama as slenderman
- referring to the administration as the misadministration
- Benghazi the second 9-11 debacle*

Training pants on fire:

- Gaug claims: Holder was never investigated

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Holder#Operation_Fast_and_Furious

In September 2012, after a nineteen-month review, the United States Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General cleared the Attorney General of any wrongdoing with regard to Fast and Furious, stating that there was "no evidence" that Holder knew about the operation before early 2011. The report did cite fourteen lower ranking officials for possible disciplinary action.

So you lied. He was thoroughly investigated by the Department of Justice of the Inspector General, and they cleared him.

- Gaug claims: Lois Lerner was insufficiently investigated

The U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI began an investigation into the IRS controversy in May 2013.[32] In October 2015, the DOJ announced it was closing the investigation and would not seek criminal charges.[3] The determination came after an investigation of almost two years, in which the DOJ and FBI interviewed more than 100 witnesses and reviewed more than a million pages of IRS documents.[3]

So analyzing just one of your absurd paragraphs, it's filled with diaper talk and outright lies.

That's why people don't try to debate with you, because your posts are just a bunch of filled up diapers. It's a waste of time, as I just demonstrated.

 

[Gaugingcatenate]

I have no idea what you're writing. It looks like you are saying earnestly, pleading with me, that you are in fact wearing big-boy pants. But Gaug, big-boys don't need to tell the world they are wearing big-boy pants. You claim you're taking off kid-gloves, but it sounds more like out of diapers and into training underwear. Don't get me wrong, it's a big step, a milestone for toddlers to be sure, but it's still got a way to go.

Here is a single, flacid paragraph you flopped out into the world:


Still in diapers:
- referring to Obama as slenderman
- referring to the administration as the misadministration
- Benghazi the second 9-11 debacle*

Training pants on fire:

- Gaug claims: Holder was never investigated

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Holder#Operation_Fast_and_Furious


So you lied. He was thoroughly investigated by the Department of Justice of the Inspector General, and they cleared him.

- Gaug claims: Lois Lerner was insufficiently investigated


So analyzing just one of your absurd paragraphs, it's filled with diaper talk and outright lies.

That's why people don't try to debate with you, because your posts are just a bunch of filled up diapers. It's a waste of time, as I just demonstrated.

Wow, talk about flopped out there.

What do you not get about the absolutely correct framing of my statement,

"NOBODY, at least nobody in the slenderman misadministration, WAS EVER GOING TO BE PROPERLY INVESTIGATED much less charged under either a Lynch or Holder, the ONLY AG in our history to be charged with contempt of Congress refusing to turn over incriminating documents when they, Congress, were investigating the Fast and Furious gun running...in charge of such. No real investigation of Lois Lerner or her lying under oath IRS director, Koskinen...nor did we ever really get to the bottom of the disgusting misadministration of the Benghazi second 9-11 debacle".

And NOBODY was. Not hard to understand, like the other, its all in understandable, dumbed down to lib standard English. Maybe get someone to assist? And most assuredly need help on your limp schtick, that was embarrassing to read it was soooOOooo poorly phrased. Not clever ever is not something to aspire to. Yano?

Nothing done under that criminal misadministration is to be looked at as straightforward nor in any way by the book. Too many agency directors [Clapper, Comey, Brennan, Koskinen etc...]and department heads [ Holder, Lynch, fat lady, Rice, Powers, etc...] and high mid levelers [ Ohr, Strzok/Page, Baker, McCabe, etc...] who were corrupt and willing to do things that others in the past were very reluctant.

Certainly not slenderman's self declared wingman Holder... nor even "call the investigation a matter" Lynch.

Yano #2?

Folks hate debating with me because they never win. I dont mind those that bow out as they are more often than not, like yours, a total waste of EVERYONE who reads em's time.

Yano #3? :lamo

 

[Mach]

I dont mind those that bow out as they are more often than not, like yours, a total waste of EVERYONE who reads em's time.

An entire post of "I know you are but what am I?" Do you tell yourself that because you don't really believe what you write, it's OK to write it?

 

[ultmd]

Well, go ahead, show us what he showed, you know, to embarrass me.

Sure, I'll show you the 2 forms that Obama authorized for release to the public.......if you show me Trump's birth certificate....and Clinton's.....and Bush's......and Reagan's.....and Romney's.....and McCain's.....or ANY other major party nominee for POTUS in the last century. And if/when you cannot do that, please be prepared to explain to us the obsession that bat-crap crazy conspiracy theorists have with Obama's Birth Certificate. Deal?

Are you in any manner aware of all the obvious faults in the supposed birth certificates already produced? I doubt it, we have so many voluntarily blind that think they have super knowledge powers.

I'm well aware of what the wingnut conspiracy theory crowd has CLAIMED to be wrong with them. I'm also well aware of the FACT that ALL of them have been thoroughly debunked.

I know, hilarious.

Yes, you really are. :lamo

How old are you? One would have had to be about 1-3 years old not to have cognitively witnessed, gone through all the racist missteps of the slenderman administration, the stupid foul ups that slenderman shat then himself stepped in. For instances, the Prof. Gates stupidity, the Trayvon Martin idiocy and bigotry, the Michael Smith lie and debacle, the Freddie Gray riots, the order for the DOJ to spike the conviction of the New Black Panthers for undeniable election intimidation tactics...

That's a nice list of some of the incidents used by people like to you incite FAKE outrage from the ignorant bigots and angry racists who hated Obama for reasons that had nothing to do with the truth. You are either very ignorant, or very dishonest, to suggest that ANY of those incidents involved a "racist" word or deed from Obama. Clearly, like a lot of angry conservative types, you don't understand what racism really is. The truth was that Obama was "divisive" because he existed, not because of anything he ever said or did. It was people like you who created that narrative.

Stepped in when he should not have, stepped in too soon before the information was available and was wrong on each. He was an empty suit, an incompetent.

:lamo Fortunately, your opinions don't count. The Black Panther remarks were just plain stupid, but they do reveal that you get a lot of your information from the bowels of the right wing blogoshpere. LOL. Truthfully, if President Obama had stepped in on the side of the police in those incidents, you and your ilk would have had no problem with how or when he "stepped in". And you know it.

Yep...slenderman was the ultimate divider in chief.

Only to people like you...and that's ok with the rest of us.

And its a little overlapping on the racist side to call the birther controversy to be ultimately based upon racism. We the people have a right to know who we are electing, the legitimate facts, we have the right to wonder why they are hiding certain facts and the right to get to the bottom of what is going on. That those that are blind choose to remain blind, well that is up to them. The rest of us have our own rights... and as an American we can demand to know the truth.

What an incredibly IGNORANT rant. Of course your birtherism is rooted in your personal racial bigotry. That is not even up for debate. If you people weren't interested in Trump's tax returns, no one cares if you think it's your "right" to see Obama's birth certificate and college transcripts. So, make no mistake, "you the people" are not fooling anyone. Let us know when you're all ready to demand the "original" birth certificate and the college transcripts of Trump, ok?

We clear here?

See the above, and be sure you answer me directly. Got it? It's very "clear" that you are exactly what you appear to be.

I agree with you on his mother being American so he is American... unless he changed or disavowed his citizenship. Something is being hidden and I am one of the curious, one of the inquisitive intelligent that would like to have the answers.

This is the kind of bat-crap crazy nonsense that explains why people like you engender so little respect in public. LOL