- Joined
- Apr 20, 2013
- Messages
- 12,331
- Reaction score
- 1,941
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
At about :55 into the video Corsi explains what happened, that the Muel deal would have required him to lie, to commit fraud to the court which he is refusing to do.Instead of writing a word salad conspiracy theory, how about laying out exactly what you think me, and Ari got wrong and when exactly did he start tripping over himself? Because, "I lied and I'm ready to die in jail," is a direct quote that's pretty hard to misinterpret.
At around 2:25 he states it exactly as he sees it, he had voluntarily spoken with the investigation with no intention to willfully lie. Merriam Webster lie to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive.
So he is saying exactly the opposite of what your OP says he said, as did the MSLSD biased left wing facilitator. He admitted information he gave the first day was wrong as he had forgotten a single email Corsi forwarded 2 years previous ... you may have perfect memory on all such, most of us do not. He agreed and testified, and amended testimony as to such, did not try to deny it once reminded.
He, Corsi, NEVER agreed to call his testimony a lie, tho this MSLSD biased left wing spin facilitator would simply not take no for an answer. At around the ten-minute mark, MSLSD guy gets as close as he was going to get, that under the definitions of what they, the grand jury, wanted to hear, his testimony in their eyes was a lie and to which he countered that it was not intentional, that he merely forgot.
Corsi specifically said on many occasions during that interview that he did NOT lie.
To construe that interview any other way is a lie, a knowingly made untrue statement with the intent to deceive.