[W:13]Mueller has the evidence now

[MrShangles]

Could a liberal help me here, y’all all seam to be professional about obstruction of justice.
The word now is that all those stroke,page text have been erased by the Mueller team, they make out like it’s ok, but here’s the catch, just so happens that judicial watch had been able to get a subpoena from a judge for all those text messages a few weeks ago. Ok liberals, is that considered obstruction of justice? But remember what y’all have been saying about Trump. Do y’all see a similarity here 33,000 deleted subpoenaed emails, deleting 19,000 subpoenaed text messages .



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[beefheart]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

Could a liberal help me here, y’all all seam to be professional about obstruction of justice.
The word now is that all those stroke,page text have been erased by the Mueller team, they make out like it’s ok, but here’s the catch, just so happens that judicial watch had been able to get a subpoena from a judge for all those text messages a few weeks ago. Ok liberals, is that considered obstruction of justice? But remember what y’all have been saying about Trump. Do y’all see a similarity here 33,000 deleted subpoenaed emails, deleting 19,000 subpoenaed text messages .



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Post that in English please. And show your sources.

Judicial Watch?:lamo

 

[MrShangles]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

Post that in English please. And show your sources.

Judicial Watch?:lamo

You should probably not debate if your that far gone. I think I hear your sheep herder calling


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[beefheart]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

You should probably not debate if your that far gone. I think I hear your sheep herder calling


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You made statements, not backed up by sources.

Learn how to debate.

 

[Redress]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

Could a liberal help me here, y’all all seam to be professional about obstruction of justice.
The word now is that all those stroke,page text have been erased by the Mueller team, they make out like it’s ok, but here’s the catch, just so happens that judicial watch had been able to get a subpoena from a judge for all those text messages a few weeks ago. Ok liberals, is that considered obstruction of justice? But remember what y’all have been saying about Trump. Do y’all see a similarity here 33,000 deleted subpoenaed emails, deleting 19,000 subpoenaed text messages .



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

It helps to get the actual facts. Here, let me help: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/13/doj-investigation-missing-texts-peter-stzrok-lisa-page-1063234

An investigation by the Justice Department’s watchdog into missing text messages from the FBI-issued cellphones of former investigators Lisa Page and Peter Strzok recovered thousands of text messages on agency-issued phones belonging to the pair.

But it did not attribute the missing texts to malicious intent on behalf of the two but rather a technology failure by the FBI’s tool meant to sweep up text messages, according to a new report.

 

[eohrnberger]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

Mueller is playing the role he was intended to play from the onset of the 'Russian Collusion' fabrication.

Mueller’s key role is to have nearly absolute control over what information is released to investigators or the public. Mueller determines what Horowitz and Huber can see. Mueller can hide anythinghe wants by claiming that release of the information would hinder his ‘investigation’. He has given Rod Rosenstein a list of lines of inquiry that will not be allowed. Rosenstein, who volunteered to be part of the soft coup, is happy to comply. We have witnessed Rosenstein repeatedly refuse to turn over documents to Congress, flagrantly obstructing its oversight role.

What is the most effective way to hide the truth and protect the deep-state criminals? It’s the never-ending Mueller investigation. Sure, Mueller’s team is still in the business of promoting the Trump-Russia fiction, but the most important role of this ‘investigation’ may be to obstruct any real investigation.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/12/are_the_investigations_the_coverup.html

to obstruct any real investigation of any real criminality of those in the previous administration.

 

[MrShangles]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

It helps to get the actual facts. Here, let me help: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/13/doj-investigation-missing-texts-peter-stzrok-lisa-page-1063234

But you even got to admit, the FBI does have a way of losing or deleting evidence that helps Trumps side. You gotta be fair.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Mr Person]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

Could a liberal help me here

Nope....

y’all all seam to be professional about obstruction of justice.
The word now is that all those stroke,page text have been erased by the Mueller team, they make out like it’s ok, but here’s the catch, just so happens that judicial watch had been able to get a subpoena from a judge for all those text messages a few weeks ago. Ok liberals, is that considered obstruction of justice? But remember what y’all have been saying about Trump. Do y’all see a similarity here 33,000 deleted subpoenaed emails, deleting 19,000 subpoenaed text messages .

Nobody who shrugs off Ivanka and Douchedon's sloppiness with things like emails and cellphones but rages about Hillary's email has anything to say about anything related. (Didn't he also accidentally reveal info he shouldn't have, on video?)

That's especially true when you do not know what the **** your are trying to talk about. (See Redress's post).

 

[MrShangles]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

You made statements, not backed up by sources.

Learn how to debate.

Sorry I’m an old white southern male, and I’m just slow I guess.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Redress]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

But you even got to admit, the FBI does have a way of losing or deleting evidence that helps Trumps side. You gotta be fair.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Got a list?

 

[MrShangles]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

Nope....






Nobody who shrugs off Ivanka and Douchedon's sloppiness with things like emails and cellphones but rages about Hillary's email has anything to say about anything related. (Didn't he also accidentally reveal info he shouldn't have, on video?)

That's especially true when you do not know what the **** your are trying to talk about. (See Redress's post).

So much hate! Maybe I’m not to your equal but help me learn.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Mr Person]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

So much hate! Maybe I’m not to your equal but help me learn.

Oh, no, do put on your Hate Detector Ring.

Highlight the relevant portions of that post and make an argument why they demonstrate "hate."





Was it the asterixes? Are naughty words hateful?

:roll:

 

[Gina]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

Moderator's Warning:

The topic is not each other. Also, the superfluous commentary needs to stop. Be productive, or you'll be gone.

 

[MrShangles]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

Moderator's Warning:

The topic is not each other. Also, the superfluous commentary needs to stop. Be productive, or you'll be gone.

I just ask a question


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Gina]

Re: Mueller has the evidence now

I just ask a question


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Moderator's Warning:

Please do not quote and reply to mod boxes. If you have a question or concern, you can PM a mod or use the Contact Us button.