- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 120,522
- Reaction score
- 76,583
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Actually, 100 years hence, people will wonder how we could have been so barbaric as to allow wholesale baby-slaughter. Much as we look back today and wonder how people justify slavery
'Baby' isn't a legal term at all. Who said I had to use legal terms?
Abortion can be a very responsible choice and here is the proof:
--There's nothing responsible about having a kid you cant afford and expecting tax payers to take up that burden with public assistance.
--There's nothing responsible about having a kid you arent emotionally prepared to have and may abuse or neglect.
--There's nothing responsible about having a kid if you know you wont stop drinking, smoking, doing drugs, etc that will damage the unborn.
--There's nothing responsible about remaining pregnant and dropping out of high school or college or missing work and not fulfilling your potential in sciety.
--There's nothing responsible about remaining pregnant/having a child and not being able to fulfill your other commitments and obligations to family, dependents, employer, church, community, society.
--There's nothing responsible about having a kid and giving it up for adoption when there are already over 100,000 kids in America waiting to be adopted. It means one less waiting will find a home. It is immoral to encourage women to unnecessarily give birth only to add more unwanted kids to this pool.
Now do you still deny that abortion can be very responsible?
That's true...I tried to get you to address the issue in the only way possible open to making changes in it...the legal system...and you dropped the conversation like a hot potato. You are completely ignorant on that aspect and it is the ONLY way to make changes.
Nobody is interested in...or afraid of...your repressive misogynistic beliefs on the issue.
The only thing that matters is the law. And the Constitution protects women's rights.
100 yrs in the future, hopefully we will have developed our socio-economic conditions into a much better support system for everyone and women will not feel that they need to have abortions.
We are moving in that direction now, with most women, by far, choosing to have their babies and the abortion rate goes down every year.
1. Make that decision before you open your legs.
2. Make that decision before you open your legs.
3. Make that decision before you open your legs.
4. Make that decision before you open your legs.
5. Make that decision before you open your legs.
6. That's a lie. There is not a shortage of adoptive families for domestic infants.
Lying again? Over and over, the same lie to try and promote your false and misogynistic agenda? You will have to answer for that someday, to the Lord.
Because you have been reminded over and over, that 97.5% of all abortions consist of painlessly flushing a pea-sized or smaller unborn from the womb. And the rest are all medically necessary.
No bloody slaughter....your self-indulgent feelings are based on false info and indicates a very disturbed mind and you use it to dishonestly emotionally manipulate people on an issue where you have no real facts to argue with.
There is no baby slaughter, that this is in your twisted mind as the truth does not make it accurate. You are just posting pro-life lies time and time again.
And there was no justification of slavery, there never was. There is however perfect justification for allowing women their constitutional rights.
Anyone that posts material this crude and stupid really has nothing intelligent to add to any discussion let alone a discussion on privacy, reproduction and abortion.
Misogynic? According to Gallup, the MAJORITY of women agree with my pro-life position. You should examine your own misogyny.
Nobody agrees with you on anything
Just telling it like it is. If a baby is problematic, women should keep their legs closed, and men should keep their zippers zipped. The fun is for those committed in marriage who are willing to accept the responsibility. If you aren't grown up to do either, you are not entitled to that fun.
Sounds like the atheist left is getting frustrated because so many people DO agree with me.
Sounds like the atheist left is getting frustrated because so many people DO agree with me.
You and who else are in charge of creating your lala-land of impeccable morals? This is the same person that finds Democrats' goals unrealistic?
He doenst beleive any of the BS he spews he is actually very very very anti Chrisitran he posts to try and make Christians look bad
Misogynic? According to Gallup, the MAJORITY of women agree with my pro-life position. You should examine your own misogyny.
There's a margin of error in polls so that 51% (bare majority) could actually be under 50%.
Just telling it like it is. If a baby is problematic, women should keep their legs closed, and men should keep their zippers zipped. The fun is for those committed in marriage who are willing to accept the responsibility. If you aren't grown up to do either, you are not entitled to that fun.
Abortion is nothing BUT baby slaughter. Spinning it as something else doesn't make it so. You are posting anti-life lies time and time again. The law allowing the killing of little babies in the womb is immoral, and wrong, and like slavery, it will soon be a relic on the ash heap of history.
Trying to compare your sinful self with JesusThe Pharisees in Jesus' day implied he wasn't a real Jew, so.....I guess I am in good company.
There are godless Pharisees in every age, trying to bring the godly down to their level.
My marital status has nothing to do w/ my refusal to give birth.
Trying to compare your sinful self with Jesus
More proof you are not a Chrisitan
Coulda shoulda woulda. You guys are in the minority. Don't claim to speak for women. They disagree with you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?