Conservatives love embryos.
They tell us all the time.
They speak effusively about them in conversation, publicly revere them, shed crocodile tears over them, accost strangers entering clinics over them, viciously troll people on social media over them, sermonize on street corners about them.
They even claim to have voted for an otherwise reprehensible monster they’d never otherwise tolerate to lead them—solely because of them.
The problem with their breathless, tearful zealotry, is that once these embryos are no longer embryos—these supposed life-lovers often don’t treat them like they’re at all human.
Nine or thirteen or thirty-two or sixty-five years later when they show up in their communities and in their emergency rooms and along their borders, in need of food or refuge or healthcare or compassion—they’re no longer something sacred or beautiful. Unless these lives conform to the narrowest and most stringent of criteria (usually being white, Republican), they’re more often treated as threats to be neutralized and adversaries to be destroyed.
If White Conservatives Loved All People The Way They Do Embryos
Once the baby is born, the "prolife" movement picks and chooses which babies' lives matters and which do not.
Immigrants fleeing hellish conditions for a chance at a new life? They don't matter.
Babies born into deep poverty? They don't matter.
Babies in abusive households? They don't matter.
LGBTQs? They don't matter. Especially Ts and Qs.
And so on, and so forth. Have you ever noticed how the people who claim to be devout supporters of the lives of babies are remarkably opposed to any kind of policy that would increase the survivability of babies once they leave the womb? Why this hypocrisy, anti-choicers?
People who oppose abortion also oppose the killing of innocent humans after they're born.
P.S. This is a really old and worn out bait. You can do better.
If White Conservatives Loved All People The Way They Do Embryos
Once the baby is born, the "prolife" movement picks and chooses which babies' lives matters and which do not.
I don't agree with pro-lifers in any way, but sorry, this is a terrible argument. It's kind of like whataboutism, as much as I hate that term.
As far as I know, there isn't a single white conservative that thinks it's okay to kill people without some external justification, so you can't use their opinion on that subject with respect to "all people" to make an argument regarding their proposed treatment of embyros.
People who oppose abortion also oppose the killing of innocent humans after they're born.
P.S. This is a really old and worn out bait. You can do better.
So why are they usually war supporters? Conservatives want wars and liberals know better than to kill innocent civilians who did nothing to us.
Tell that to Bill Clinton or Barack Obama.
Why? They inherited wars that were started by the Bush family.
Why? They inherited wars that were started by the Bush family.
Why? They inherited wars that were started by the Bush family.
I didn't read much past the racist thread title.If White Conservatives Loved All People The Way They Do Embryos
Once the baby is born, the "prolife" movement picks and chooses which babies' lives matters and which do not.
Immigrants fleeing hellish conditions for a chance at a new life? They don't matter.
Babies born into deep poverty? They don't matter.
Babies in abusive households? They don't matter.
LGBTQs? They don't matter. Especially Ts and Qs.
And so on, and so forth. Have you ever noticed how the people who claim to be devout supporters of the lives of babies are remarkably opposed to any kind of policy that would increase the survivability of babies once they leave the womb? Why this hypocrisy, anti-choicers?
People who oppose abortion also oppose the killing of innocent humans after they're born.
P.S. This is a really old and worn out bait. You can do better.
I didn't read much past the racist thread title.
Instead of playing the race card, why don't you try to laysplain to us what was factually wrong with it.
If White Conservatives Loved All People The Way They Do Embryos
Once the baby is born, the "prolife" movement picks and chooses which babies' lives matters and which do not.
Immigrants fleeing hellish conditions for a chance at a new life? They don't matter.
Babies born into deep poverty? They don't matter.
Babies in abusive households? They don't matter.
LGBTQs? They don't matter. Especially Ts and Qs.
And so on, and so forth. Have you ever noticed how the people who claim to be devout supporters of the lives of babies are remarkably opposed to any kind of policy that would increase the survivability of babies once they leave the womb? Why this hypocrisy, anti-choicers?
I didn't play the race card, the op did.
Both sides are hypocrites on the issue.
Bothsiderism. You too, if the OP is wrong, please offer evidence as to why.
If White Conservatives Loved All People The Way They Do Embryos
Once the baby is born, the "prolife" movement picks and chooses which babies' lives matters and which do not.
Immigrants fleeing hellish conditions for a chance at a new life? They don't matter.
Babies born into deep poverty? They don't matter.
Babies in abusive households? They don't matter.
LGBTQs? They don't matter. Especially Ts and Qs.
And so on, and so forth. Have you ever noticed how the people who claim to be devout supporters of the lives of babies are remarkably opposed to any kind of policy that would increase the survivability of babies once they leave the womb? Why this hypocrisy, anti-choicers?
The right can make the same argument. They can say the left won’t even give the baby a chance. They can say the left claims to be the compassionate ones but kills babies.
I’m pro choice, because there are too many unwanted babies that are being raised by incompetent parents.
Yea, bothsiderism.
Prolifers do not care for all babies' lives once they are born. Truth hurts. :shrug:
I think you need to get a new hobby. Trolling the internet doesn't seem to be your strong suit.
If White Conservatives Loved All People The Way They Do Embryos
Once the baby is born, the "prolife" movement picks and chooses which babies' lives matters and which do not.
Immigrants fleeing hellish conditions for a chance at a new life? They don't matter.
Babies born into deep poverty? They don't matter.
Babies in abusive households? They don't matter.
LGBTQs? They don't matter. Especially Ts and Qs.
And so on, and so forth. Have you ever noticed how the people who claim to be devout supporters of the lives of babies are remarkably opposed to any kind of policy that would increase the survivability of babies once they leave the womb? Why this hypocrisy, anti-choicers?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?