While I appreciate why you said what you did, silence when people come on this thread to hijack it to express their pro Putin subjective opinions sometimes posters who feel misstated required rebuttal particularly when they are being responded to with comments engaging in pro Putin scripts to apologize and defend what he has ordered or what is happening on the ground to serve as disinformation ans deflection from the topic.
Right on queue. You should ask for a raise!
I wasn't talking about the posts arguing if Putin is to blame. I was responding to a post (the second one) that was strictly a complaint about debate tactics.
I mean, you don’t really mean independent media. Independent media is shows like Tucker Carlson, or various podcasts, or the American conservative. You are talking about the corporate press, which is most assuredly not independent. Most of the big funded media outlets in the west whether they be government like BBC or corporate like CNN, or merely propaganda outlets for global homo
Are they being thrown in jail for reporting what they see? No? Then they're independent.
Sky News and others have independent reporters in Ukraine. They are not being thrown in jail for reporting what they see.
Man that lady in the bottom photo sure looks cranky, I would too if I was rusted out of bed by soldiers and taken to a bombed out building for a photo shoot.
Are they being thrown in jail for reporting what they see? No.
Oh who knows. We're getting fed the anti-Russian half of the story by our government and hysterical, exaggerated shrieks from Ukranian officials about everything. I honestly have no idea how the war is going. I have no idea if the neo-Nazi Azov pukes would cosy up in a maternity hospital, using them as human shields. They've been fighting other Ukranians for years, haven't they? The whole story is full of holes, since if it was full of women and children, one would think more would have been killed. On the other hand, where were all the Azov fighters supposedly using it as a base? And then again, why would Russians shell it if they weren't getting fired on from the grounds? Probably there is a little reality in all those scenarios somewhere.
Tucker is a dissident journalist.
Yes, you are right. Point taken. I think I may have had the wrong impression at any rate.
Tucker is a ****ing imbecile, a low life scumbag just like all those who listen to him.
Making up convenient facts on the spot is neither convincing nor honest. If that's all you have, then you have nothing.
about Russians killed, your post is uselessly vague.
Russia only seized Crimea when the pro-Russian president was ousted. Before then Russia was friendly. As to the second point Russia will obv impose some restrictions on that and make Ukraine dependent on Russian oil. Better that than what's happening now.
So does Hungary allows defensive weapons on its territory ? In that case it was a not a weapons transport.
False narratives don't have to be consistent, alas, because there's always another false flag to point to.So, was the hospital seized by the far right fighters...or did they Ukrainian military bomb their own children in a false flag operation?
Come on Russia! You have to be consistent when you are spreading false narratives
metro.co.uk
From my perspective its 3-4 posters that are on the Russian teat while other posters are more reasonable. Those 3-4 posters are quite active though.