Here I was, hoping that you wouldn't get this desperate, this quickly. Yet here we are, throwing out that attempt at poisoning the well.
Then again, I can do just the same and say that you just do want to see any evidence that counters your worldview, or some other childish example of it.
What are you babbling about? I provided you with direct and cited incontrovertible evidence of collusion. You have repeatedly ignored it and refused to address it because you'd prefer to post lies.
I also noticed you didn't reply to the part of my post which directly replied to you, instead choosing to reply to the part I directed at a different account. Did you forget you were posting as Oborosen?
You want to know why I don't see that they proved collusion?
Because you're getting paid not to? That's my guess.
Because at every turn it's, they spoke with someone and that's it.
I literally cited Trump Jr., Kushner, and Manafort sitting down with Russian officials to get information from Russia.
Why do you keep posting these lies?
Most of the time barely going any further than that.
Like PapaD meeting repeatedly with Mifsud at the direction of Sam Clovis? Like Cohen actively negotiating a Trump Tower Moscow with government officials? Like Trump Jr. accepting dirt on Clinton and saying, "I love it"? Like Roger Stone coordinating with Wikileaks on the timing to release what Russia hacked? Like Manafort providing internal campaign polling data to Kilimnik? Like Trump himself directly contradicting American intelligence and saying he believes Putin, thereby trying to cover up Russia's illegal actions? Like Trump firing the FBI Director for refusing to end the investigation? Like Trump trying to extort Ukraine to make false claims about the DNC email server, which Trump wanted to absolve Russia of crimes?
How much "further" do you demand? Never mind, like I said, I'm sure you're paid to not accept any of that.
And even then, conversing with someone doesn't actually prove any wrongdoing was conducted.
Russia committed crimes by hacking the DNC and then offered that illegally obtained information to the Trump campaign, which the Trump campaign eagerly accepted, lied about, and then tried to help Russia get away with.
Again, I'm sure you're paid to not understand why that is "wrongdoing", but patriotic Americans do.
Hell, the most we can get two of them on, opposition research and even then we can see that such rulings affect Hillary's people the most. Were it still the case.
This doesn't even make sense. The Trump campaign actively worked with Russia, as Russia was illegally trying to interfere in the election.
Had their case been better if they'd count collusion as a crime?
Again, this doesn't make sense, for so many reasons.
No, because even Mueller declared that there just wasn't sufficient evidence for that.
Another lie. Mueller did not say there was not sufficient evidence to charge collusion.
Why so many lies?
Hence why I don't believe in this whole collusion fiasco.
Nothing you just said makes any sense at all to anyone who has actually watched the news or read the reports I mentioned.
But it's mainly because the democrats had their chance and they failed at it, time, and time again. I'm tired of this same old story that refuses to even budge in one direction. To either having a conclusion, or that it's finally dead. It's a literal waste of space as far as a general story goes.
The conclusion is the Trump campaign actively worked with a hostile foreign government who committed violations of US law to help the Trump campaign win the election and then the Trump campaign repeatedly lied and try to cover up their involvement with Russians, even as they tried to help Russia get away with the crimes they committed.
That's the only logical conclusion to anyone who knows this story and has a shred of honesty. And that includes the Republican led Senate Intelligence committee.