- Joined
- Jan 23, 2019
- Messages
- 4,405
- Reaction score
- 2,855
- Location
- Seattle WA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
Last week i actually heard this.Haven’t you heard?
Anyone who has an opposition view are paid protestors by George Soros and therefore not relevant.
Last week i actually heard this.
****, Soros is too old to sign a check.
The MAGAs thought it would be butterflies and rainbows. No more abortions, the border closed, and America “uber alles”. It was a pipe dream from the start, and fueled by massive insecurity and flawed thinking. They are now going to have to deal with their cognitive dissonance.What did everyone think was going to happen?
At some point MAGAs were going to go after social safety nets to pave the way for more tax cuts for the wealthy.
His son isn't.
That's because the rats have sold lies to their retarded mindless minions who actually believe that Musk is going to steal their pennies rather than to identify the fraud that all those rat clowns once admitted exists.
****ing morons...the lot of them.
Damn right!!The people's goal is to get rid of Republicans.
That's because the rats have sold lies to their retarded mindless minions who actually believe that Musk is going to steal their pennies rather than to identify the fraud that all those rat clowns once admitted exists.
****ing morons...the lot of them.
The MAGAs thought it would be butterflies and rainbows. No more abortions, the border closed, and America “uber alles”. It was a pipe dream from the start, and fueled by massive insecurity and flawed thinking. They are now going to have to deal with their cognitive dissonance.
Big conspiracy is it?
Meantime the world's richest men stood beside Trump as he was sworn in.
You can't make this shit up.
We don't need to make stuff up. The truth is enough to make leftists' head explode.
He isnt gutting SSA...he is identifying fraud. Its the rat party selling the notion to simps that is claiming that SSA is being gutted. And if you and the other leftists weren't so invested in your blind partisan hatred you might actually encourage their efforts at finding fraud and waste and eliminating it.Musk is the one who decided to gut the SSA and derided Social Security as a Ponzi scheme while declaring that entitlements are "the big one to eliminate." He could always just shut up and go away.
MAGA folks never thought oligarchy or fascism would be respected they're just sick of the same old establishment crap and see Trump as a middle finger to it. Authoritarianism? They’re ok with it, as long as it’s THEIR party in the driving seat. Temper tantrums? Take a look at Hitler’s behavior. Lot of temper tantrums there.MAGAs thought oligarchy and fascism would be respected, turns out now Trump is having to double down on authoritarianism and temper tantrum threats.
He isnt gutting SSA...he is identifying fraud.
Musk is the one who decided to gut the SSA and derided Social Security as a Ponzi scheme while declaring that entitlements are "the big one to eliminate." He could always just shut up and go away.
Social Security absolutely is a Ponzi scheme. How could you describe it any other way?
Nah, you're totally off base calling Social Security a Ponzi scheme. Sure, the worker-to-retiree ratio's dropped big whoop, demographics shift but that doesn't make it some shady scam. Ponzi schemes are built on fraud, promising fake returns to lure suckers in. Social Security? It's a public system, upfront about how it works current workers fund current retirees. No deception, no hidden collapse waiting to pounce. You're cherry-picking numbers to sound clever, but it's not collapsing it's just strained. Congress can tweak it, raise taxes, or adjust benefits. Ponzi schemes don't get that option; they just blow up. And Musk? He's just tossing out hot takes to stir the pot doesn't mean he's right. The NBC guy's got a point: it's efficient and universal, not some fly-by-night hustle. You're acting like math alone proves your case, but it's not that simple. How do you explain the fact it's been running for decades without crashing? Ponzi schemes don't last that long ever. What's your answer to that?Social Security absolutely is a Ponzi scheme. How could you describe it any other way?
Elon Musk was right — Social Security is a Ponzi scheme
On Social Security, however, Musk is simply correct, and just impolitic enough to say what no one wants to hear.
And liberals did not disappoint with their reaction to defend the program’s moribund status quo. An opinion writer at NBC News offered a representative non-sequitur defense of how the program operates, arguing that “Social Security is a highly functioning, universal and exceptionally efficient part of the American social safety net. It’s the opposite of a Ponzi scheme.”
But the problem is simple and mathematical. When the program started, there were 40 workers paying benefits for every retiree. Now, thanks to a combination of declining fertility, increased longevity and other factors, there are only 2.8 workers per retiree. And so right now, every penny collected from current workers, plus additional money Congress borrows against its rapidly emptying trust fund, is being funneled to the current retirees.
Does this sound familiar? It should, because this roughly is how Ponzi schemes work. They take new investors’ money to pay returns to their earlier investors. For a while, people are happy because they are getting paid. But eventually, the scheme collapses, because there are too many people demanding payouts and not enough new contributors.
So no, Social Security isn’t “the opposite of a Ponzi scheme.” It is just a Ponzi scheme whose collapse is still in the future.
What's your best truth that you think would actually make a leftist lose it?We don't need to make stuff up. The truth is enough to make leftists' head explode.
What about educated Americans who understand what is taking place. Hate us to do ya?We don't need to make stuff up. The truth is enough to make leftists' head explode.
he is identifying fraud.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?