• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Vote to OW-N Your Economy NO-W. - Why Should Should You Vote.

V07768198309

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
57
Reaction score
1
Location
Tel Aviv, Israel
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Your economy is in a Shamble:

The consequence, the history of the Great Depression tells us, will be a Formidable Chaos: social and political turmoil, widespread violent discrimination, and military adventures. Everybody is talking about it, no one is doing anything or offering a plausible solution.

I started working on our New Economy since the beginning of 1,999 after research I started in the spring of 1994 concluded that, soon or late ,the credit market will crumble and that it will not be retrievable, at least on the short run. Even if my soon to be baby girl would most probably not be dead after the deluge, I didn't have the courage to let her live in that world. I had to do something and I did.


This is the only workable solution to your economic woes.

Our Offer:

We are inviting you NO-W to vote for your economy. We will, starting on Monday, January 9th, 2012 at 4:50 PM IST, the moment of our Birth, organize among us a New Additional Economy. We don't intend to replace the prevalent system but to give you an additional option. We will add a significant incremental amount of jobs, incomes and investments. A short run solution for the long run!

Voting is Anonymous, Secure, and Ridiculously Cheap.

But the essential issue here is one of insurance, with a relatively modest premium, against a potentially catastrophic, very low probability event.

In Context
The Best of Part:

There is no string attached: Voting does not constitute an obligation to participate but a right to do so at anytime in the future after our economy is implemented. By Voting you are not in anyway foregoing the right to participate in the prevalent system. However after our Birth nobody will be allowed to become an OW-Ner anymore.

You owe it to yourself to insure your security and economic survival. No one else can do that for you.


Simple:

We designed our New Economy with simplicity in mind. We have successfully avoided most of the traps of bureaucracy. If you know how to use a cellular phone of second generation you already know how to make economic transactions.

In order to purchase your share and OW-N our economy you just need a €5 (five euro) note. You can get it at any bank branch or changer.


Design:

We design our economy to maximize the volume of transactions. That should be the goal of any economy. In that pursuit we got a bonus: our economy is prosperous, fair, stable secure, free, peaceful, and last but not least it works!

Our economy is designed to add a vast amount of revenues weeks after it is launched.

Values:

Under the constraint of maximizing the volume of transactions we have strenuously defended our core values: individual freedom, respect of privacy, non discrimination, moral values, peace.

Independence:

We don't depend on any other ideology either political, religious, philosophical or else. We can't be influenced by any private or public vested interests and that no matter how much they decide to support us. Our only concern is the OW-Ners as a society and we can never treat anyone better or worse than any other OW-Ners.

We have no political influence and we don't intend to have any . The internal affairs of any country is not relevant to us.

Your Best Interest:

Given the ridiculously low price of OW-Nership, Its security, and the fact that there is no string attached to it it is in the best interest of anyone to OW-N our Economy. However we already know that some powerful special interest group backed by very strong vested interests will forcefully opposed our economy. That is already accounted for.

Condition of Success:

We must succeed in launching our economy before July, Friday 13th, 2012. The process of purchase will be slow till the crash but then its speed will increase chaotically. We have planned our Birth for Monday, January 9th, 2012 at 4:50 PM IST. For the present moment we expect the Market Crash to take place Thursday, May 5th, 2011. It is a tentative date and we have no control on it we will update people through the media we can use as quickly as it is reasonable.

We don't need that the majority OW-Ns our economy a meaningful minority will be more than sufficient. Others will have to rely for the rest of their lives on the failing prevalent system, or on any alternative system that will or will not be proposed to them. in anyway what will be offered by a competing entity, under stressful economic conditions, will have iron strings attached to it.

If our success is certain what we don't know is how smooth and fast we will be able to get ready. It all depends on the number of OW-Ners and on the help both in human resources and logistical resources we can gather.

Alpha Test:

We will as soon as it is technically feasible launch an alpha test of our economy.

Contribution:

Simplicity means a lot of work before making the performance. We are still in a dire need of personal and material resources to complete our work before our deadline: our Birth. If you believe that you can contribute something no matter how small please send a mail PGP encrypted to Mæstro אח שלו'ם Patrick حمو. If you still don't have a PGP key and need a software make the free trial from PGP Corporation. Get used to it and send us a message. Our PGP public key can be found on their server.

We don't deal with non encrypted and signed tactical or strategical messages!

Overview:

The video is very bad, old, and some of the instruction are not relevant anymore. I wonder why I even posted it. Probably because it was a pain to make it. I had to show something for the work! It will be soon updated and improved.



[video=youtube;jBDF04fQKtQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?fv=jBDF04fQKtQ[/video]​

Our Facebook Page: Vote to OW-N Your Economy NO-W.


For many ages to come the old Adam will be so strong in us that everybody will need to do some work if he is to be contented. We shall do more things for ourselves than is usual with the rich to-day, only too glad to have small duties and tasks and routines. But beyond this, we shall endeavour to spread the bread thin on the butter-to make what work there is still to be done to be as widely shared as possible. Three-hour shifts or a fifteen-hour week may put off the problem for a great while. For three hours a day is quite enough to satisfy the old Adam in most of us!

There are changes in other spheres too which we must expect to come. When the accumulation of wealth is no longer of high social importance, there will be great changes in the code of morals. We shall be able to rid ourselves of many of the pseudo-moral principles which have hag-ridden us for two hundred years, by which we have exalted some of the most distasteful of human qualities into the position of the highest virtues. We shall be able to afford to dare to assess the money-motive at its true value. The love of money as a possession -as distinguished from the love of money as a means to the enjoyments and realities of life -will be recognised for what it is, a somewhat disgusting morbidity, one of those semicriminal, semi-pathological propensities which one hands over with a shudder to the specialists in mental disease. All kinds of social customs and economic practices, affecting the distribution of wealth and of economic rewards and penalties, which we now maintain at all costs, however distasteful and unjust they may be in themselves, because they are tremendously useful in promoting the accumulation of capital, we shall then be free, at last, to discard.

Of course there will still be many people with intense, unsatisfied purposiveness who will blindly pursue wealth-unless they can find some plausible substitute. But the rest of us will no longer be under any obligation to applaud and encourage them. For we shall inquire more curiously than is safe to-day into the true character of this “purposiveness” with which in varying degrees Nature has endowed almost all of us. For purposiveness means that we are more concerned with the remote future results of our actions than with their own quality or their immediate effects on our own environment. The “purposive” man is always trying to secure a spurious and delusive immortality for his acts by pushing his interest in them forward into time. He does not love his cat, but his cat’s kittens; nor, in truth, the kittens, but only the kittens’ kittens, and so on forward forever to the end of cat-dom. For him jam is not jam unless it is a case of jam to-morrow and never jam to-day. Thus by pushing his jam always forward into the future, he strives to secure for his act of boiling it an immortality.

Perhaps it is not an accident that the race which did most to bring the promise of immortality into the heart and essence of our religions has also done most for the principle of compound interest and particularly loves this most purposive of human institutions.

I see us free, therefore, to return to some of the most sure and certain principles of religion and traditional virtue-that avarice is a vice, that the exaction of usury is a misdemeanour, and the love of money is detestable, that those walk most truly in the paths of virtue and sane wisdom who take least thought for the morrow. We shall once more value ends above means and prefer the good to the useful. We shall honour those who can teach us how to pluck the hour and the day virtuously and well, the delightful people who are capable of taking direct enjoyment in things, the lilies of the field who toil not, neither do they spin.

But beware! The time for all this is not yet. For at least another hundred years we must pretend to ourselves and to every one that fair is foul and foul is fair; for foul is useful and fair is not. Avarice and usury and precaution must be our gods for a little longer still. For only they can lead us out of the tunnel of economic necessity into daylight.

I look forward, therefore, in days not so very remote, to the greatest change which has ever occurred in the material environment of life for human beings in the aggregate. But, of course, it will all happen gradually, not as a catastrophe. Indeed, it has already begun. The course of affairs will simply be that there will be ever larger and larger classes and groups of people from whom problems of economic necessity have been practically removed. The critical difference will be realised when this condition has become so general that the nature of one’s duty to one’s neighbour is changed. For it will remain reasonable to be economically purposive for others after it has ceased to be reasonable for oneself.

The pace at which we can reach our destination of economic bliss will be governed by four things-our power to control population, our determination to avoid wars and civil dissensions, our willingness to entrust to science the direction of those matters which are properly the concern of science, and the rate of accumulation as fixed by the margin between our production and our consumption; of which the last will easily look after itself, given the first three.

Meanwhile there will be no harm in making mild preparations for our destiny, in encouraging, and experimenting in, the arts of life as well as the activities of purpose.

But, chiefly, do not let us overestimate the importance of the economic problem, or sacrifice to its supposed necessities other matters of greater and more permanent significance. It should be a matter for specialists-like dentistry. If economists could manage to get themselves thought of as humble, competent people, on a level with dentists, that would be splendid!

In Context
To Read the the Whole Argument Follow That Link
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom