Buck Naked
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2010
- Messages
- 1,280
- Reaction score
- 240
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Buck,
The points about the OP I brought up.
You do not wish to discuss?
Were you raised in an english speaking country?
Were you raised in an english speaking country?
First lie at 32 seconds.
Are you implying it is a lie that the entire outer structure fell at or very near the rate of free fall?
Are you implying it is a lie that the entire outer structure fell at or very near the rate of free fall?
First lie at 32 seconds.
BTW it wasn't the entire outer structure it was just part of it for part of the collapse.
http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861610NIST Report said:Global collapse occurred as the entire building above the buckled region moved downward as a single unit.
By why let fact6s get in the way of a bad conspiracy?
Your wrong again.
http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861610
I don't know why you continue to ignore facts that contradict your conspiracy theory.
Your wrong again.
http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861610
I don't know why you continue to ignore facts that contradict your conspiracy theory.
That quote does NOT say the entire building collapsed at freefall. I suggest you read the paragraphs just before your quote to realize how wrong you areGlobal collapse occurred as the entire building above the buckled region moved downward as a single unit.
The reason no steel framed building had ever collapsed due to fire is not so much fire temperature but heat energy transfer.
The heat energy transferred to the large steel structural members in the fire in local areas is not enough to heat them to a high enough temperature to compromise their strength sufficiently for failure. This is generally due to the high factors of safety used in large buildings.
The fires burn out locally before anything can happen.
The blacksmith's argument is not accurate because his heat energy to steel mass ratio is far more than what exists in an office fire.
It is the specific heat and mass of the steel vs. energy available from the fire that is important and the blacksmith's argument does not consider this. Maybe he just doesn't know.
Buck,
What temps are required for molten METAL?
I think it depends upon the metal in question....
Or perhaps his argument about steel losing strength as it is heated is dead on accurate and there is no need for the steel to melt.
You will note that molten metal plays in to AE911TRUTH claims, right?
Tell me. How does molten metal work in the CD claim of yours?
How did the molten metal contribute to the collapse?
What melted all this metal?
It seems you missed my point about the heat energy in a given location not being enough to cause the steel to fail. I didn't even talk about melting.
The blacksmith did not mention specific heat, how much energy would be available in an office fire in a given location, and how much energy it would take to raise the temperature of large structural members enough to cause them to fail. Without these points what he says is inaccurate and meaningless.
That quote does NOT say the entire building collapsed at freefall.
I suggest you read the paragraphs just before your quote to realize how wrong you are
He lied when he claimed the entire building collapsed at freefall
No it doesn’t, and nor did Gage or I. Please read for comprehension.
What can I possible be wrong about? I made no claim or statement.
Gage did not use the word, “entire”. That’s just your miscomprehension resulting into false accusations.
It seems you ignored the questions asked of you.
Nor do you appear to understand temps high enough to degrade steel strength can be found in normal structural fires.
It is a KNOWN phenomena.
No it doesn’t, and nor did Gage or I. Please read for comprehension.
What can I possible be wrong about? I made no claim or statement.
Gage did not use the word, “entire”. That’s just your miscomprehension resulting into false accusations.
Either he meant the entire building collapsed at the rate of freefall or he INTENTIONALLY worded it to sound that way.catches fire and also collapses. This one literally at the rate of freefall.
It isn't the temperatures. It is the energy.
You could have a 3 ft. diameter campfire with temperatures of 700 to 800 degrees C and it won't have enough energy to raise the temperature of a 6,000 lb. W33 x 130 x 45 foot long steel girder like A2001 by more than 100 degrees.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?