Aderleth
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2011
- Messages
- 4,294
- Reaction score
- 2,027
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Vinton County Woman Wants Possessions Back After Bank Tried To Repossess Wrong
I've been thinking about that myself. The problem with larceny or burglary charges is that they require proof of criminal intent. If they (the bank and its repo agents) believed that they were lawfully seizing property that belonged to them there's no criminal intent. If they sold or otherwise benefited from the property that was taken after being on notice that they didn't have any right to it that would be criminal (probably misappropriation or possibly embezzlement).
Barring criminal charges, her best bet is a civil case, in which case she can (and should) get both compensatory damages and any gains made by the bank from the property, along with possibly punitive damages (to the extent that the bank willfully screwed her) and very likely attorneys fees as well. Of course that's a best case scenario, and unfortunately would probably take months to make its way through the courts.
I'm curious - since the bank and the repo company went after the wrong house, couldn't the homeowner have both criminally charged with break and enter and grand larceny? If you went into your neighbours house and took all their stuff, I'm pretty sure the police wouldn't just leave it for you and your neighbour to argue out in court.
I've been thinking about that myself. The problem with larceny or burglary charges is that they require proof of criminal intent. If they (the bank and its repo agents) believed that they were lawfully seizing property that belonged to them there's no criminal intent. If they sold or otherwise benefited from the property that was taken after being on notice that they didn't have any right to it that would be criminal (probably misappropriation or possibly embezzlement).
Barring criminal charges, her best bet is a civil case, in which case she can (and should) get both compensatory damages and any gains made by the bank from the property, along with possibly punitive damages (to the extent that the bank willfully screwed her) and very likely attorneys fees as well. Of course that's a best case scenario, and unfortunately would probably take months to make its way through the courts.