Point of information:
A review of the videos provided as evidence only show the discovery of cars with tires slashed.
The allegation that the police did it is a presumption based on hearsay.
I believe there is some video evidence I've seen elsewhere of police slashing tires of cars approaching police lines, while other officers are removing recalcitrant vehicle occupants.
However, it does not follow (absent clear and convincing evidence) that it was the police who slashed the vehicle tires in that story. It could as easily (if not more likely) have been vandals, rioters, or anarchist groups pushing to blame the police.
When all the facts are in, then we can discuss this properly. Meanwhile, this remains an allegation based on hearsay, and not necessarily fact.
(Sigh)
I did watch both videos. As I stated in my response only the top video showed the officer's slashing tires, and it was of TWO cars close to their police line, one out in the middle of the street.
However if you watch the rest of that video, those are the only two you see. If you then go to the Wal-Mart parking lot where all of the cars tires are slashed?
All you see is slashed tires and someone declaring they heard it was police officer's doing it.
Why would they do this? Maybe this example:
Meanwhile, do not assume you are on my "scroll past" list (like it's some mark of honor :roll: ). I read response posts, and have several reasons why I don't respond to some and do respond to others. My tagline contains the principle reason, my blogs the rest.
You really should learn that free expression also allows one to NOT respond when one feels no need to. :shrug: