boblzer0
Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2008
- Messages
- 64
- Reaction score
- 18
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
If it had been a man who jumped in there, struggled with the officer, shoved the officer, and pulled away the "suspect" he was attempting to put into custody, would you guys be calling it "police brutality" if he punched him? Probably not. Such hypocrisy is pretty rampant in this country.
She assaulted an officer, he had every right to subdue her.
What I'm more amazed by his how difficult a time he had with actually subduing her. I'm guessing he was trying to be more "gentle" when he saw all the camera, but IMO, he was FAR too easy on her, hence why she kept slipping his grasp.
Then he needs to be re-trained on handcuffing because what he seemed to be trying to didnt appear to be doing anything except grabbing her hands and holding them, not cuffing her.
I was raised to never hit a woman, and she wasn't threatening his life. He could have just pushed her down?
I would never hit a lady.
However, I will deck a bitch, if she insists on it. :mrgreen:
LOL - I heeearrr ya.
If these women were being "ladies" then they wouldn't evne be in this fickle pickle.
Where's your avatar from? It looks very familiar but I can't place it.
Good point - he definitely didn't seem to be telling her she was under arrest, rather, it seems that he was trying to restrain her from fighting? (I might be wrong, though).
Obviously he needs training: #1 - how to actually handle someone who's resisting arrest and #2 - how to use non-face-punching means to deal with someone intervening.
and the overall title of this thread is misleading - the woman wasn't punched for jaywalking, she was punched because she tried to interfere with the activities of a police officer.
Not sure why people are so staunch in taking sides on this one. This is just a video. Is there an article that talks about what actually happened? The video started when the two people were already in bodily contact. Hard to tell who started it.
According to Seattle police, the incident began when an officer spotted a man jaywalking in the 3100 block of Martin Luther King, Jr. Way S. at approximately 3:10 p.m. The man was some 15 feet away from a pedestrian overpass, police said.
The officer was talking to the man when he saw four young women jaywalk across the same street at the same spot. The officer asked the women to step over to his patrol car, but the women were being "verbally antagonistic toward the officer," according to officials.
One of the women, later identified as a 19 year old, began to walk away from the scene despite the officer's instructions, prompting the officer to walk over to her and escort her back to his patrol car.
The girl then "began to tense up her arm, and pull away from the officer while yelling at him," investigators said. The officer told the girl to place her hands on his patrol car, but she refused. When the officer tried to grab hold of her, "she pulled away and twisted, breaking free of the officer's grip several times," the blotter report said.
When the officer tried to handcuff the girl, another girl, this one 17 years old, intervened and placed her hands on the officer's arm, "causing the officer to believe she was attempting to physically affect the first subject's escape," police said.
The officer pushed back the second girl, but the girl came back at him. The officer then punched her, police said.
The incident happened at Martin Luther King Jr. Way South near the arterial's intersection with Rainier Avenue South, in the vicinity of Franklin High School.
A Seattle transportation department plan released in 2006 called for Seattle police pedestrian-safety patrols to target jaywalking, particularly near Franklin High and north of South McClellan Street by the Lowe's hardware store.
Between 2002 and 2006 more jaywalkers were hit by vehicles on Rainier Avenue South than in any other corridor in the city.
During that period, 61 pedestrians were struck while jaywalking on Rainier Avenue South -- nearly double the number of accidents on Aurora Avenue North, which had the second highest number of jaywalkers hit with 35, according to Seattle Transportation Department records.
Metz says Franklin High School asked Seattle Police to enforce the jaywalking law outside campus because of all the students that don't use the sky bridge to safely cross the street.
The key is he never issued verbal commands or warning with is SOP in every single police department that I am aware of. The woman was also unarmed and not posing a threat to the life of the officer, that makes a difference.If someone just walked up to an officer and pushed them, it might be reasonable to expect the officer to give a warning. When the officer is already involved in a scuffle with one person and then another joins in the fray, I would be surprised if any police department would require the officer to hand out verbal warnings before using physical force.
I was raised to never hit a woman, and she wasn't threatening his life. He could have just pushed her down?
seems to me he was trying to be as less violent as possible, then he got fed up :shrug: as rivrrat said, if it was a bloke, no-one'd really care
I'm not saying you're wrong, but what are you basing this on? To the best of my knowledge, Seattle PD has said that they believe the guy complied with all rules.
Those cops should be bettter chosen. A person who cant keep their cool shouldnt be a cop.
Those cops should be bettter chosen. A person who cant keep their cool shouldnt be a cop.
[Officers Guild President] Rich O'Neil told KCPQ-TV that punching her in the face was an appropriate use of force as the officer [Ian P. Walsh] struggled with two women and a crowd formed. O'Neil says it's wrong to call the punch police brutality or racist.
While I do think the officer would have been justified in use of appropriate force to subdue the woman, a punch to the face is NOT appropriate force. His life was not in danger, she was not armed, she was not striking his face, and he offered no verbal warnings (which you are required to do prior to the use of any force).
What he should have done is immediately call for another officer.
It was a disproportionate use of force where it was not necessary.
Everything else was right. but this was..Was he right to hit? No - because she actually didn't hit him. . . minor overreaction, it's actually understandable in this situation.
Cops are not SUPPOSED to punch angry people in the face, cops are not thugs nor are they supposed to act like thugs. There was no clear need to strike her in the face and again, he issued no verbal warnings which is EXTREMELY important and something any cop should know to do.
She was struggling, but I saw no attempt made to cuff the woman in black before the officer struck the woman in pink
Please, offer to train him with your expert knowledge.Then he needs to be re-trained on handcuffing because what he seemed to be trying to didnt appear to be doing anything except grabbing her hands and holding them, not cuffing her.
Again, no the officer is not required to give verbal warnings in the case where they are actively getting attacked.Again, the officer is required to give verbal warnings in this case. If the officer felt the application of force was necessary, he had the option of deploying pepper spray which is specifically designed for a situation like this.
The key is he never issued verbal commands or warning with is SOP in every single police department that I am aware of. The woman was also unarmed and not posing a threat to the life of the officer, that makes a difference.
Ding Ding Ding.Frankly you kind of deserve to be punched for being stupid enough to go up and shove a police officer. Had he continued to punch her, that would have been overboard, but I see no problem with how he responded.