- Joined
- May 26, 2016
- Messages
- 1,272
- Reaction score
- 590
- Location
- Deepest, Darkest NZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Nonsense.I think they should have shot him, it's shameful they didn't. If you know someone is dangerous enough to kill 10 people they should shoot first unless he's apprehended unarmed. They pose a risk to public safety
Nonsense.
Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk
I think they should have shot him, it's shameful they didn't. If you know someone is dangerous enough to kill 10 people they should shoot first unless he's apprehended unarmed. They pose a risk to public safety
He didnt shoot anyone, he ran all 10 people over with his rental vanDude said he had a gun and was "reaching" for one. He's already killed 10 people, going to let him shoot some more?
Dude said he had a gun and was "reaching" for one. He's already killed 10 people, going to let him shoot some more?
I think they should have shot him, it's shameful they didn't. If you know someone is dangerous enough to kill 10 people they should shoot first unless he's apprehended unarmed. They pose a risk to public safety
Yeah, thought the same thing too. The officer had to assess the situation quickly and from his actions it shows that he quickly realised the guy wasn't holding a real gun. When the officer sheaths his gun and instead draws his baton it's clear he's in control of the situation.
I would say this arrest video should be regularly shown in US police training camp but you have to remember that according to many B.S. American posters here, we can't compare US gun laws and shootings against anywhere else.
I think they should have shot him, it's shameful they didn't. If you know someone is dangerous enough to kill 10 people they should shoot first unless he's apprehended unarmed. They pose a risk to public safety
My understanding is that Canadian police agencies, in response to shooting incidents that were similar to those we have in the US, have been training their officers in de-escalation techniques and trying to get their officers out of a "shoot first and ask questions later" mindset.
If so though, we probably can learn some lessons from our northern brothers.
I think they should have shot him, it's shameful they didn't. If you know someone is dangerous enough to kill 10 people they should shoot first unless he's apprehended unarmed. They pose a risk to public safety
He didnt shoot anyone, he ran all 10 people over with his rental van
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?