• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

US study lays bare extreme pay-ratio problem

Bullseye said:
Sorry, no, you "research" doesn't prove anymore than that our economy is based on meritocracy.
Click to expand...

Meritocracy, me arse.

Income Disparity is so important a factor in economics that it is taken very seriously.

Except for Rightist Twits who think immense riches are "their due" for having benefited from a warped Upper-income Taxation as well as fudging some markets illegally (ala SubPrime Mess) and bringing down the economy around our ears in a Great Recession that began in 2008 and lasted 5 long years (because the Right in the HofR refused stimulus-spending) until 2014 when the economy finally started creating jobs again ...

Bullseye said:
PS: Piketty is an ultra-liberal looney, who is generally laughed at in mainstream economics.
Click to expand...

Sticks and stones can break my bones, but names can never hurt anyone.

Of course, Picketty is a French socialist. No wonder you hate him.

He's also one helluva lot smarter than you are. He runs France's major Economics School.

But, that's irrelevant ... isn't it?
 
Lafayette said:
I have an advanced degree in Economics, and I worked my ass-off trying to get it.
Click to expand...
Congratulations. I salute your accomplishment.

Lafayette said:
By no means did I "fudge" the numbers in order to get the results I desired.
Click to expand...
Ok, call it cherry picking - designing your sample to produce the result you desire.

Lafayette said:
For which, btw, if ever discovered would have likely cost me my job teaching economics.

What planet do you live on ... ?
Click to expand...
The real world, not the academic ivory tower you do.
 
Lafayette said:
Meritocracy, me arse.
Click to expand...
So, can I assume you're only accepting minimum wage? Or are you getting more because of your advanced degree?

Lafayette said:
Income Disparity is so important a factor in economics that it is taken very seriously.
Click to expand...
LOL, right, but you're accepting your pay even though it's likely much higher than the people that keep your office clean or trim the lawns and plants around your building, because you've EARNED that through you hard work of gaining an ADVANCED degree.

"warped Upper-income Taxation"? You mean like paying a tremendous portion of the total revenue, a portion much larger than the actual income is to the total?


Lafayetee said:
Sticks and stones can break my bones, but names can never hurt anyone.
Click to expand...
Then why do you insist on using them on me?

 
jimbo said:
There is your problem. No one is confined below the poverty threshold. When you believe that you have a self fulfilling prophecy.
Click to expand...

More survival of the fittest bullshat.

The world has evolved to a higher level in terms of Income Fairness.

Not socialist income equality but Income Equitability. Meaning "characterized by equity or fairness; just and right; fair; reasonable: equitable treatment of all citizens.

You were evidently left somewhere behind ...
 
Lafayette said:
More survival of the fittest bullshat.

The world has evolved to a higher level in terms of Income Fairness.
Click to expand...

So are you willing to give up your pay for someone else that makes less in your company?
I am not. Neither are a lot of other people.


Not socialist income equality but Income Equitability. Meaning "characterized by equity or fairness; just and right; fair; reasonable: equitable treatment of all citizens.

You were evidently left somewhere behind ...
Click to expand...

People are paid based on their value to the market.
The more value they bring to the market the more they are worth.
 

OK enough on the class warfare. "If there is class warfare in America, my class is clearly winning." Warren Buffet.

What the CEOs (all exec. levels in Corp.) make is the very reason for the existence of capitalism in addition to what I call...the wealth factor.

The top 5% have and can make (not earn) million$ from the million$ they can afford to invest. Then after a year, something called
capital gains is taxed at HALF the tax rate of the top 1040 rates of income earners, from wages, tips and salaries.

Example: Bloomberg worth $3.3 billion become mayor of NY. I'd call that a full time job and more...much more. However, when [he] left the mayor ship, net worth was $33.3 billion. That 1100% in 12 years. How many middle class can even begin to approach that. That has quickly ballooned to $56 billion.

Not only is that relatively untaxed as compared to the highest earners but it's wealth of royalty that if taxed 50% from the beginning would leave say $28 billion.

Now tell me, is that not enough of an incentive ? And that 50% tax rate could be temporary until the fiscally insane congress...stops borrowing.

And do not start in on the jobs he created 0, or the risk he took, almost none. The US tax code's favor to capital, is flat out immoral and is turning more than half of the American population into debt paupers.

Philosophers call the US culture as a culture of prosperity where everybody is to work all they can, invest all they can to become...as rich as possible. Confirming below, de Tocqueville...never saw a country...!!

America is the world's modern financial Soddom & Gommorah.
 
Last edited:

Eighty percent of poor households have air conditioning. But can't run it because can't pay the higher elect. bill.
Nearly three-quarters have a car or truck; 31 percent have two or more cars or trucks. But can't afford the gas, tires upkeep and insurance.
Nearly two-thirds have cable or satellite television. Soon to be 1/2, then a 3rd as more everyday...pull the plug.
Two-thirds have at least one DVD player, and a quarter have two or more. So what, like a radio, a one time expense subject to a monthly elec. bill.
Half have a personal computer; one in seven has two or more computers. Again, so what ? Most of them ancient and almost inoperable.
More than half of poor families with children have a video game system such as an Xbox or PlayStation. Ridiculous, rich because you are distracted from the real world ?
Forty percent have a wide-screen plasma or LCD TV.
Ninety-two percent of poor households have a microwave. Skipping the ridiculous notion the poor are so well off because of electronic distractions.
Forty-two percent of all poor households actually own their own homes. Most of which are very old, falling apart lead laden pipes and paint, un-insurable with some even condemned.
The average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio. So ?
Ninety-six percent of poor parents stated that their children were never hungry at any time during the year because they could not afford food. But they can't afford much else.
The average consumption of protein, vitamins, and minerals is virtually the same for poor and middle-class children and in most cases is well above recommended norms. So they are living past 50 now, or is it 60 ?
 

You always dismiss any discussion of this topic.

However, history clearly shows that greed and power hunger are the reasons for every revolution ever.
 

And greed and the hunger for power have been the end of every society where they ran unchecked.
 
gdgyva said:
you tell me why Dwayne the Rock Johnson is paid 22 million per movie, and i will explain why CEO's are paid they they are
Click to expand...

The rock is popular. A movie with him in it will.probably make money.

Ceo's sit on each others boards and vote each other raises.

Not the same dynamic.
 

There was an abrupt change in the wealth distribution dynamics in the mid seventies.

We all were getting richer each year at about the same rate from ww2 til then.

Not making enough more to keep up with Inflation, actually getting fatter. Wage increases above inflation.

With the lowest quintile actually doing a bit better than the rest.

Then that came to an end. All of a sudden.

The lower 80% saw their wages flatten out. Barely keeping up with inflation. Affording the same lifestyle it did in the mid seventies.

At the same time the wealth of the top 20% went up. Dramatically. A simple glance at the graphs clearly shows it was a transfer from the lower 80% to the top 20%.

They no longer needed to share the growth of the country with the majority so they simply stopped. We can debate whether that's cool or not. But its what happened.

Had this been the result of a changing post ww2 economy the arc of the upper quintile and corporate profits would have trended more or less as it had been. NOT gone up massively.
 
What if...? said:
And greed and the hunger for power have been the end of every society where they ran unchecked.
Click to expand...

Well I do envy those that have more free speech in the bank...million$ more. We soon see how their free speech rights are a whole lot more equal, than...90% of Americans.

I do envy those who can buy and sell things, make million$ even billion$ and pay a federal tax rate equal to those earning $50,000.

Envy must be part of the American culture the way millionaires envy billionaires, doing everything they can to become a billionaire.

And as we know in the American culture of prosperity...that's not nearly enough.
 
late said:
In the 1960s, the pay ratio was 16 to one... I have to go soon, look up pay ratios in Europe.

Now, it's 100 to one, 200 to one, some places it's even higher.

Read Price of Inequality by Stiglitz for the full story.
Click to expand...

Look at Rome at its heyday. 1 million people, 50,000 professional class, artisans and intelligentsia, 950,000...living in the dirt.

Prompted the great Roman senate grain handout, literally buying their votes with food. Sounds like a very possible American future.
 

Capital gains is divided into several things. Long term and short term.
Short term capital gains are counted as income.
Long term capital gains is counted at the 20% mark or whatever it is 15% i think.


which means he should be investigated on insider trading deals or corruption deals that allowed him to benefit.


The whole point is it doesn't matter what someone else makes. that doesn't stop you from doing the same thing.
just because tim earned 1m dollar doesn't mean that jill can't.

our system is not designed like that. this is not monopoly.
 

The costs of empire are what kills empires.

Extreme income inequality and corruption are joined at the hip, born that way. You don't inherit a future, you build it, and that is something we don't do half as much as we used to.
 
gdgyva said:
you tell me why Dwayne the Rock Johnson is paid 22 million per movie, and i will explain why CEO's are paid they they are
Click to expand...

The 'Rock' is boxoffice and his movies earn much more because of it.

CEOs with the destruction of corporate democracy over the last 1/2 of the 20th century, rape the stockholders and investors who as a result...can do nothing.

Boards of Directors are made up of other CEOs and corp. exec, who increase their own pay, when they increase ALL exec. pay.

All of the above was illegal and subject to an extremely high levels of regulation during the time when ALL of our conservative founding fathers...hated the corp.

The courts and the greedy took over right around the middle of the 19th century and was totally corrupt.
 
Fearandloathing said:
That tells the whole story.

Next
Click to expand...

Hardly, doesn't even begin to justify or rationalize anything about corp. exec. pay. Many of which make in a year what the Rock did for that movie after
outlandish incompetence. See Jamie Dimon. Lost $7 billion on one screw-up but kept his job and got million$ in salary ($27 million every year) and
bonuses and has a personal net worth of $1.1 billion.

Movies don't even rank with the likes of wall street. There is no comparison.
 
Bullseye said:
Congratulations. I salute your accomplishment.

Ok, call it cherry picking - designing your sample to produce the result you desire.

The real world, not the academic ivory tower you do.
Click to expand...

Yes, the real world reveals the unmatched greed and avarice in the American (and western) economies.
 
TRULY PATHETIC!

ludin said:
People are paid based on their value to the market.
The more value they bring to the market the more they are worth.
Click to expand...

Nope. We are masters of our destiny, and WE DECIDE. Not "the market".

A minimum-wage of $7.25/hour is ridiculous in a country where the Poverty-Threshold is $12/hour.

So, we must find the courage to pass a law that stipulates the National Minimum-Wage at $12/hour.

See this table here. Only eight states "plan" to have a Minimum Wage at or above $12/hour within the not too distant future.

Pathetic. Truly pathetic for the Greatest Nation on Earth ... !
 
 
Pedestrian said:
Yes, the real world reveals the unmatched greed and avarice in the American (and western) economies.
Click to expand...
Funny, for an alleged conservative you sure spew those LW mantras easily.
 
late said:
The costs of empire are what kills empires.

Extreme income inequality and corruption are joined at the hip, born that way. You don't inherit a future, you build it, and that is something we don't do half as much as we used to.
Click to expand...

If I understand you correctly then what's been obviously missing is American statesmen. Instead, America gets petty little, power barons,

concerned only with their own short term self interest. Germany, Japan others have a concerted govt./private industrial policies.

America...none. American businesses and corp. are free to build up or destroy the America economy for its people.

They have chosen to destroy it exporting every job they can and importing every foreign professional they can, with the effect of lowering the prevailing wage.

"Americans are going to have to give up their cushy high paying jobs." Steve Forbes. A man whose only claim to fame (or infamy) was to pick the right father.
 


That's a very hostile post considering I am mostly in agreement with you.

I like to say it's been great before I say good bye, but mistakenly insulting someone on their first post does not bode well for any kind of meaningful relationship down the road.

Good bye
 
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…