- Joined
- Jun 20, 2018
- Messages
- 60,389
- Reaction score
- 38,930
- Location
- Somewhere in the Low Country
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Nope, the 2 are not the same. The first one was at a much higher altitude and was much larger than this one. Are you calling our soldiers liars?Wow! Joe is so decisive and strong. LOL. He's a joke. So shooting this one down on the west coast just puts the lie to the administrations explanation of why they let the other fly across the country. I'm sure Xi told him to behave.
the military said that the object at 65000 ft was not a danger to anyone on the ground and that if it was shot down it could become a danger...it was over land, not water...and as soon as it came to a lower altitude and was over water, they shot it down. You really think our military is incompetent and that is sad.
Do you have top secret clearance? If not, you don't know when they spotted it or when they started checking it out. You also don't know who did what or recommended what.... the balloon crossed over Alaska, then Canada, then entered CONUS over Montana. The military only scrambled a plane to follow it after people started posting pictures of it in the sky over Montana.
And how would they know that a balloon at 60,000 feet was no danger to people on the ground? What if it dropped a payload to drop? Heck, what if the balloon accidental popped over a populated area?
You were under no obligation to take on the position that the unmanned claim was false, but you did anyway. You just couldn't help yourself.
this second one wasn't at 60,000 ft, it was at 40000 and it was much much smaller than the first one.... the balloon crossed over Alaska, then Canada, then entered CONUS over Montana. The military only scrambled a plane to follow it after people started posting pictures of it in the sky over Montana.
And how would they know that a balloon at 60,000 feet was no danger to people on the ground? What if it dropped a payload to drop? Heck, what if the balloon accidental popped over a populated area?
um, he has more detentions than Trump ever did...that shows our border is far more secure under Biden than under Trump.“We’re going to remain vigilant about our airspace,” he added. “The president takes his obligations to protect our national security interests as paramount.”
LOL
except at the southern border
and Afghanistan debacle
and when China sends surveillance balloon across the USA
Well, you're free to correct the record then. Do you or don't you believe that the object was unmanned? Because you stated before that you don't believe it.You built another straw man, I see. Keep punching, Cardinal.
Not out of proportion to the number of balloon puns being made.This balloon issue seems to be ballooning out of proportion
The same rules did apply. They shot it down over water. The Chinese balloon was not a threat to air traffic. Dude you keep running out of things to say and trying to invent new things that aren't any better. Sorry buddy, you just don't have anything to whine about here.You can stop shooting your argument, it's already dead.
Weird that the same rules didn't apply to an identified Chinese spy balloon, isn't it? Why didn't Joe shoot it while it was entering Alaskan air space, rather than leaving South Carolina air space?
You forgot to mention which one was violating the sovereignty of the other.Great. A weenie-wagging contest between nuclear nations.
It could indeed just be a weather balloonAside from the possibility that this could be another Chinese weather balloon, what else could it be and why? Aren't there regulations on who can fly what and where?
I think Alaska relies a lot on air transport, so that could be a legit concern.
Looking for sunshine in Alaska.It could indeed just be a weather balloon
One of those air-headed Palins accidentally recharged with helium.Fool me once……..
US shoots down ‘high-altitude object’ of ‘unknown origin’ over Alaska
The incident comes a week after a Chinese spy balloon was shot down over South Carolinawww.independent.co.uk
We have an epidemic……
It's a UFO.“Mr Kirby said there was little information available about the object at the time it was shot down, but clarified that it was “much smaller than the spy balloon we took down last Saturday” and had “no significant payload.”
“We’re calling this an object because that’s the best description we have right now,” he said. “We do not know who owns it, whether it’s state-owned or corporate-owned or privately-owned. ”
I float humor when I canNot out of proportion to the number of balloon puns being made.
They assessed that it didn't have a payload to drop, and that it was in no danger of "popping."... the balloon crossed over Alaska, then Canada, then entered CONUS over Montana. The military only scrambled a plane to follow it after people started posting pictures of it in the sky over Montana.
And how would they know that a balloon at 60,000 feet was no danger to people on the ground? What if it dropped a payload to drop? Heck, what if the balloon accidental popped over a populated area?
I guess it depends on if it exploded on contact...I don’t think a reasonable response is to just start shooting at everything at 40,000 feet and ask questions later.
Who described it this way?You should probably read more information about this. It wasn’t a balloon - in fact they were explicit that it was not the size or shape of the recent balloon and are not willing to refer to it as a balloon. They described it as a cylindrical, silvery, object the size of a car moving at fast speeds that appeared to be unmanned and without a propulsion system. Pilots have reported seeing such objects for decades and have never collided with one.
Performative outrage.I'm saying I'm not buying into the act that your arguments are predicated on any sort of principle. Whether the object is identified or not won't have any impact on your position.
It wasn't unidentified. It was identified by the pilots. They just haven't released this information to the public at this point.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?