- Joined
- Jun 20, 2018
- Messages
- 59,745
- Reaction score
- 38,291
- Location
- Somewhere in the Low Country
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Do you know it won't? Ever been to Alaska?You think the wind is magically going to change direction and blow it south?
Sheeit.Fool me once……..
US shoots down ‘high-altitude object’ of ‘unknown origin’ over Alaska
The incident comes a week after a Chinese spy balloon was shot down over South Carolinawww.independent.co.uk
We have an epidemic……
Alaska doesn’t have special physics.Do you know it won't? Ever been to Alaska?
Alaska's weather patterns and wind changes daily...sometimes by the hour...and those balloons tend to move pretty fast...it got across the entire US in 3 days.Alaska doesn’t have special physics.
You should probably read more information about this. It wasn’t a balloon - in fact they were explicit that it was not the size or shape of the recent balloon and are not willing to refer to it as a balloon. They described it as a cylindrical, silvery, object the size of a car moving at fast speeds that appeared to be unmanned and without a propulsion system. Pilots have reported seeing such objects for decades and have never collided with one.Alaska's weather patterns and wind changes daily...sometimes by the hour...and those balloons tend to move pretty fast...it got across the entire US in 3 days.
I suppose you would love it if it downed a plane.
yeah, that is so remember 9-11?
Okay, then the object was identified and you can rest easy. If you don't accept their claim that it was unmanned then you don't have to accept the claim that it was unidentified.
That said, thanks for the admission that you're not here to debate in good faith.
He is saying Artic like it is Antarctica and it isn't...it is Alaska we are talking about....they have flights all over Alaska because it is the easiest method of moving supplies.
Yes there are.D
You didn’t answer the questions. There are no flight paths anywhere near where this object was.
View attachment 67436634
But you rejected the unmanned claim anyway for no reason other than it made it less easy to attack Biden.YOu need a few good faith debates under your belt, Cardinal, before you can start slinging accusations. I mean, I didn't even make manned or unmanned an essential part of the issue with shooting at unidentified objects. That was your straw man.
If you aren't behind the scenes you need to take a seat and let our military handle it.I don't trust their determination of a thing they already stated they couldn't identify...
Link to exactly what it was? I doubt you know.You should probably read more information about this. It wasn’t a balloon - in fact they were explicit that it was not the size or shape of the recent balloon and are not willing to refer to it as a balloon. They described it as a cylindrical, silvery, object the size of a car moving at fast speeds that appeared to be unmanned and without a propulsion system. Pilots have reported seeing such objects for decades and have never collided with one.
The definition of a UFO is that it’s unidentified.Link to exactly what it was? I doubt you know.
The fighters didn't down anything on 9/11, they will now....if you are in our airspace without permission they go and look...if you are a threat you are shot out of the air...and that includes airliners that are loaded with people.I remember it vividly. Do you think the scrambled fighters were just popping off missiles at unidentified radar blips?
most of us would not consider a spying device, from another country a UFO....The definition of a UFO is that it’s unidentified.
Source that this is a spying device from another country?most of us would not consider a spying device, from another country a UFO....
I don't care what it was...it could have been your toy plane...if it is a danger to our aircraft it is going to be shot out of the air.Source that this is a spying device from another country?
The fighters didn't down anything on 9/11, they will now....if you are in our airspace without permission they go and look...if you are a threat you are shot out of the air...and that includes airliners that are loaded with people.
the military said that the object at 65000 ft was not a danger to anyone on the ground and that if it was shot down it could become a danger...it was over land, not water...and as soon as it came to a lower altitude and was over water, they shot it down. You really think our military is incompetent and that is sad.You can stop shooting your argument, it's already dead.
Weird that the same rules didn't apply to an identified Chinese spy balloon, isn't it?
But you rejected the unmanned claim anyway for no reason other than it made it less easy to attack Biden.
You were under no obligation to take on the position that the unmanned claim was false, but you did anyway. You just couldn't help yourself.Yeah, I'm free to critique your straw men while you punch them.
That's one of NYTimesPitchbot's better ones.
He can't do anything right!
Wow! Joe is so decisive and strong. LOL. He's a joke. So shooting this one down on the west coast just puts the lie to the administrations explanation of why they let the other fly across the country. I'm sure Xi told him to behave.We do seem to have an epidemic!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?