Fallenangel
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2013
- Messages
- 3,416
- Reaction score
- 1,099
- Location
- Israel/Russia/UK
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I already explained why it is irrelevant to the discussion of whether the various Al-Qaeda affiliated groups represent only a 6% of the fighting forces or more.It's just not really an al-Qaeda-ish thing to do. There's not much else to it.
It is an interesting report I wasn't really aware of the difference between Islamism and Salafism. Thanks for providing it.
Dude, I don't want to use Islamist and potential terrorist websites to find out objective information about them. First, I don't care for malware. Second, any stats/percentages/information they provide won't be useful in an analysis of their legitimacy other than to find out their stated goals.
Get a better anti virus protection - because if one gets his info from "safe" sources....well, he ain't gonna get much info about anything.
Note that I didn't refer you to the numbers they posted on the site but to the videos and info about them - in the videos and info they are clearly showing that they are connected to the world Jihad movement (although they often claim not to take part in it).
So what? That's pretty much max 1000 fighters for each Salafist faction other than al-Nusra, and so that means that there's max 10% rebels who are kinda, sorta indirectly temporary allies with al-Qaeda - and that's with an extremely small estimate on the number of secular fighters.
So, we at least moved on from the barely 6% figure solely based upon the various openly Al-Qaeda connected groups, and this was without even considering other world Jihad movements that are connected to the same "tree".
There is no such term as "friend"/"not a friend" in the conflict and in the relationships between the various world Jihad movements in Syria and around the world. There are multiple branches of that movement, there are multiple sources for that ideology and there are multiple "faces" for what the "western reporters" and "experts" usually call Al-Qaeda.I wouldn't even consider any group that flies the black flag to be an al-Qaeda friend, although I by no means support them.
Ahrar al-sham is one of them. (although like I already mentioned, due to political reasons it often tries to distance itself from them at every opportunity)
I'd consider moderates to be anyone on the Islamic Liberation Front, and those in the mujahideen who promise to protect the rights of religious minorities. The SILF is 37,000, combine that with the FSA's minimum of 50,000 secular rebels, and with the more moderate mujahideen (if there are any) and you've got yourself an overwhelming majority of non al-Qaeda, non-jihadists.
Again, we weren't discussing the FSA, or other groups their numbers and the amount of influence they can have on the population or the future of Syria.
All we were discussing is whether the various Al-Qaeda affiliated groups represent a mere 6% of the fighting forces in Syria or more.
Cheers,
Fallen.