• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

US Forces Storm Iranian Consulate in Iraq

Goobieman

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
17,343
Reaction score
2,876
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
US Forces Storm Iranian Consulate in Iraq
(CNSNews.com) - US troops have raided an Iranian consulate in the northern Iraqi town of Irbi, seizing five staffers and removing computers and papers, the BBC reported early Thursday. The Bush administration accuses Iran of fueling sectarian violence in Iraq, and Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons is a constant worry.

</title> <met

Hmm.

"Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops. We will disrupt the attacks on our forces. We will interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria. And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq."
-GWB 10 JAN 2007

Living up to the tough talk?
 
</title> <met

Hmm.

"Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops. We will disrupt the attacks on our forces. We will interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria. And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq."
-GWB 10 JAN 2007

Living up to the tough talk?

Or trying to start another war. Would an attack on a US consulate be viewed as an act war?
 
Or trying to start another war?
Dubya needs another mess to distract everyone from all the other messes he has gotten us into. Not to mention the half a trillion dollars of tax payers money he has either thrown down a hole or given to his and Dr. Evils buddies at Haliburton.
 
Or trying to start another war. Would an attack on a US consulate be viewed as an act war?

I don't know did we go to war when the Iranians not only attacked our embassy but took numerous hostages? The act of war came when the Iranians started supplying the insurgency with advanced IEDs.
 
Damn skippy. Stop this political correct war BS and do what needs to be done. The evidence of possible and probable Iranian support for insurgents is clear and present. As such, there is a large suspicion that they are aiding in the attempted destruction of the government of Iraq, and the killing of American soldiers, and as such they damn well should be checking the Consulate to investigate to see if such aid may be coming even from Iranian strongholds inside the country itself.
 
Are consulates built on sovereign soil like embassies are?

Depending on the answer, and the intelligence, I could go either way on this one... ****
 
I don't know did we go to war when the Iranians not only attacked our embassy but took numerous hostages?

Good point, I agree that was an act of war. Now this administration is doing it to Iran.

The act of war came when the Iranians started supplying the insurgency with advanced IEDs.

I don't know this is true. Supplying weapons to one side in a conflict gets close, I agree. I know Germany argued that US supply of GB in WWII was, though at that time our Govt maintained as a neutral it had the right to trade and supply munitions to whomever it wanted.
 
Dubya needs another mess to distract everyone from all the other messes he has gotten us into.

No, he ain't going after some milk factory to distract people from his activity as a documented sexual predator! Bush is just refusing to ignore the REAL source of violence in Iraq (and d@mn near the whole Middle East) anymore like everyone else (especially the Democrat's) wants to do!

Raids in the Kurdish area along the Iranian border, detaining Iranians now instead of releasing them, raiding the embassy that is engaging in acts of war, declaring that our troops will now engage basically anyone with a weapon in Iraq who isn't one of the coalition or working for the New Iraqi Goverment - that ALL criminal activity will be a target (where we were ignoring some on-going activity before), and demanding that the Iraqi Goverment/military take down SADR (the rogue Iraqi cleric who is working for the Iranians in an attempt to overthrow the new Iraq goverment because Iran promised he could be the new puppet President when Iran takes over) and his Mahdi militia......all I have to say is:

IT'S ABOUT FREAKIN TIME!


Time to put the 'PC' away, take off the kid gloves, and decide to win this thing and go home instead of (SOME politicians) spending another 2 years griping, bickering, dragging our feet, impeding progress, helping the insurgents/enemy wage their propoganda war, and NOT supporting the troops!

Grow the b@lls to get over Viet Nam, realize that the North Vietnemese just wanted 1 Vet Nam while the Muslim Extremists want the WORLD and will not stop from coming back to the US after us AGAIN, finally decide to WIN a war instead of coming up with reasons why we can't and should roll over, and - as Nike says - JUST DO IT!

And I've got news for you - if you don't deal with Sadr AND Iran, you are wasting your time because they are 90% of your problem! PERIOD, DOT!

(Sadr, BTW, is the SOB who killed some 1500 of his own people - men, women, and children - then tried to blame the US for the attack. When he was caught, he tried to pull a 'Barry Bonds' by throwing us under the bus for his crimes: "Well, it was the U.S.'s fault for not protecting them!" Our fault you slaughtered some 1500 of your own people to help Iran overthrow the New Iraqi Goverment so YOU could be the new dicktator?!)
 
Are consulates built on sovereign soil like embassies are?

Depending on the answer, and the intelligence, I could go either way on this one... ****

Its a diplomatic mission and under international law it is the sovereign soil of Iran. But I believe a requirement is that the host nation has accepted it as a diplomatic mission.. as in, you cant just rent a room and claim its a diplomatic mission.

Not that diplomatic immunity stops madmen and terrorists, but had hoped it would stop civilzed nations like the US. That is of course if it was in fact a diplomatic mission accepted by the host nation.. if not, got no complaints from me.
 
Its a diplomatic mission and under international law it is the sovereign soil of Iran. But I believe a requirement is that the host nation has accepted it as a diplomatic mission.. as in, you cant just rent a room and claim its a diplomatic mission.

Not that diplomatic immunity stops madmen and terrorists, but had hoped it would stop civilzed nations like the US. That is of course if it was in fact a diplomatic mission accepted by the host nation.. if not, got no complaints from me.


Since the news is trickling out that they have found evidence to show the Iranian embassy was used to aid the insurgency and Anti-American as well as Anti-New Iraq Goverment forces, I would say that theirs was NOT a diplomatic mission.....unless you count trying to overthrow a soverign nation's goverment in order to enslave it (much like Lebanon) a 'diplomatic' mission!
 
I don't know this is true. Supplying weapons to one side in a conflict gets close, I agree. I know Germany argued that US supply of GB in WWII was, though at that time our Govt maintained as a neutral it had the right to trade and supply munitions to whomever it wanted.

Difference being that the United States was selling arms and munitions openly to other countries. Iran has been shown to not only be supplying arms and munitions to rebels, but also giving them training and backing them financially to a point as well if I believed.
 
Grow the b@lls to get over Viet Nam, realize that the North Vietnemese just wanted 1 Vet Nam while the Muslim Extremists want the WORLD and will not stop from coming back to the US after us AGAIN, finally decide to WIN a war instead of coming up with reasons why we can't and should roll over, and - as Nike says - JUST DO IT!
*buzzer* Nope, sorry, incorrect. Perhaps you should look at what they are actually fighting for. It isn't for the West to be like them. It isn't for Russia to be like them. It isn't for most of Africa, East Asia, and all kinds of places to be like them. It is for two simple things: 1) To have governments in the Middle East to be based on Islamic law; and 2) For us to get the HELL out of their business and stop being culture imperialists. They see ANYONE who supports the current, not-how-they-think-it-should-be governments as the enemy. The ONLY reasons they are pissed at the West is we are trying to make them be more like us and because we are supporting governments in the Mid East who they don't like. If we stayed out of their business, they'd stay out of ours. Ever heard of Finland being attacked by Muslim extremists? I didn't think so. Just an example of a country staying out of their business and their returning of the favor.
Here's how we can probably get most terrorist groups to back off - Tell them we are leaving the Mid East, not coming back, having no ties to the Mid East, and not even bothering with that area anymore, because we are sick of it. Bring the military home and guard our borders.

On the OP: We've been trying to pick a fight with Iran since 1979 when they overthrew our puppet government (the Shah). We have no problem shooting down their commercial airliners, why would we not take the opportunity to strike their diplomatic mission in a place that we already have soldiers?
 
Good point, I agree that was an act of war.

And do you approve of the NOTHING done in response ?

Was the policy of allowing a nation to commit acts of war on the U.S. indefinitely with no consequence one you were in favor of ?

If not, do you then say that the proper response is to make war back ?

If so, what is your problem with . . .

Now this administration is doing it to Iran.

So which is it Irie ? Do you support doing nothing to Iran while they commit acts of war on us ? (the previous plan) Or do you favor hitting back ? (the new plan)
 
And do you approve of the NOTHING done in response ?

That is a different question. End result was that all the hostages came home alive, not a bad result.

Was the policy of allowing a nation to commit acts of war on the U.S. indefinitely with no consequence one you were in favor of ?

No, though given the background of US meddling in Iran (ie helping to depose their elected government in favor of a brutal dictator) and the circumstances, I don't disagree with the response.

If not, do you then say that the proper response is to make war back ?

Certainly not in every case.

If so, what is your problem with . . .

Two wrongs don't make a right?

So which is it Irie ? Do you support doing nothing to Iran while they commit acts of war on us ? (the previous plan) Or do you favor hitting back ? (the new plan)

Depends on the circumstances. Do I think that every time there is a act that can be arguably made as a justification for war should result in war? Nope.
 
Since the news is trickling out that they have found evidence to show the Iranian embassy was used to aid the insurgency and Anti-American as well as Anti-New Iraq Goverment forces, I would say that theirs was NOT a diplomatic mission.....unless you count trying to overthrow a soverign nation's goverment in order to enslave it (much like Lebanon) a 'diplomatic' mission!

Thats hardly the point.

A diplomatic mission is protected under international law if accepted by the host nation (which is usually a formality). If the Iraqi goverment suspects the mission or people in the mission aiding the terrorists or insurgency, then they can expel and even close the mission down and suffer the diplomatic consequeces that come with that.. thats usually a similar action by the other side in the other sides country. Thats the "civilized way", and has been since the 50s, and even long before that in most parts of the world.

During the cold war, the Soviet Embassy harbored loads of spies, but the US did not go in guns blazing there did it now? They did not infact touch people with diplomatic immunity. They did however expel diplomats if they suspected anything or wanted to send a message. The same did the Soviets, but in every case I have heard of, international law was upheld and the host country did not enter on the grounds of the diplomatic mission unless invited.

But as you said, the information is still coming out, so we shall see. However if it was an offical diplomatic mission, then the US is in for one hell of a rough time for allies and foes alike, dispite the facts might be pointing to that persons in the mission aided the terrorists or insurgents.
 
Or trying to start another war. Would an attack on a US consulate be viewed as an act war?

Funny YOU a liberal would say this.....wouldnt you say invading another country an act of war?

If so, then why are you liberals fighting to get illegals rights here in America?

By your standards we should be at war with Mexico then.........boy oh boy would you liberals be whining then........yet you just said you support war when a nation attacks another nation.....Mexico is attacking America by invading our borders with the help of the Mexican Govt.............when does the war with Mexico begin??? I would like to be there.........
 
Funny YOU a liberal would say this.....wouldnt you say invading another country an act of war?

If so, then why are you liberals fighting to get illegals rights here in America?

I'm not fighting to get illegals here.

By your standards we should be at war with Mexico then.........boy oh boy would you liberals be whining then........yet you just said you support war when a nation attacks another nation.....Mexico is attacking America by invading our borders with the help of the Mexican Govt.............when does the war with Mexico begin??? I would like to be there.........

Imaginative contention.
 
*buzzer* Nope, sorry, incorrect. Ever heard of Finland being attacked by Muslim extremists? I didn't think so. Just an example of a country staying out of their business and their returning of the favor.

Here's how we can probably get most terrorist groups to back off - Tell them we are leaving the Mid East, not coming back, having no ties to the Mid East, and not even bothering with that area anymore, because we are sick of it. Bring the military home and guard our borders. QUOTE]

*buzzer* Nope, sorry, incorrect. OBL, Zarqawi, and the leader of Iraq - they have all said that the goal of their Jihad, their one desire is to create a world that is Muslim-ONLY, that if you don't convert you are killed! Iran's leader has PROMISED to wipe Israel off the face of the eart, to come after the U.S. and do the same once Israel is eliminated because, after Israel in their own backyard, the U.S. is the only REAL threat to them reaching that goal of 1 Muslim-only world! When the leader of a country who has already helped the perpetrators of 9/11 get into our country secretly tells you that he is going to nuke Israel and the US while he is developing the ability to do so.....I pay attention and tend to believe him. When he/Iran has their fingerprints on Islamic violence/enslavement/genocide across the globe (Israel, Lebanon, HOA, Afghanistan, Iraq....) and threatens us....I tend to believe him/them!

You demonstrate the same ignorance that many of our Democratic Party representatives do - they believe that all we have to do is come home, become isolationists, that the terrorists will like us more, will treat us with respect and dignity, and will leave us alone! These are the guys who beheaded our troops on TV while our politicians were screaming torture about playing music too loud, giving detainees better food than our troops in the field, and for moving a Koran during a cell inspection! These are the guys who slaughtered some 1500 of their own men, women, and children recently to frame the US! These are the same people who committed 9/11. And these are the same people who have promised to come back HERE and nuke us/finish us off! So please forgive me if I don't buy the 'Let's just bring everyone back home, change our name to Finland, and everything will be fine' bit!

Finland?! How about the Muslim riots in France? france are the biggest weapons whores on the planet, had troops on the groun in the early days of the Iraq war helping Hussein, have been selling weapons to the Insurgents, Hezbollah, Iran, and the Muslims who have been committing the genocide down in Africa for years - Chirac has been pleading their case for years, but all of a sudden they turned on France and brought the nation to a stand-still, darn near threatening their goverment for a bit. (Their only mistake is that they played their hand too soon!) No one - westerner - has been a bigger friend than France, but it ain't about 'friends'! If you are not Muslim, you are an INFIDEL and MUST DIE! Get it through your head!

How about Ethiopia! Iran (proven) has 'advisors' (who happen to be in the Iranian military) down in Africa assisting the genocidal Muslims hwo have been killing anyone NON-Muslim. france, BTW, was exposed for having been selling weapons to the genocidal terrorists while blocking the U.N. from sending as much as a 'fact finding' team down there let alone anyreal help. Ethiopia just recently sent in troops to help the refugees and stop at least PART of the genocide! Africa - NOT the MIDDLE EAST! Al Qaeda and Syria just called for Al Qaeda and all Muslims to launch suicide/terrorist attacks against Ethiopia for trying to intervene!

Today's Muslim Extremist threat is almost no different and certainly (arguably) just as dangerous - if not MORE so - than Hitler and the Nazi movement to take over the world, resulting in WW2. One of the main differences right now is that Iran and Syria are not DIRECTLY raising their nation's flags amongst the ranks of the insurgent and terrorist armies they are having wage their war...a war that has been going on for a while and is most certainly ALREADY a World-war.

Only, many of our politicians are in denial, refuse to see it, and are too busy finding excuses to lose the war rather than fight the on-going war which is for our very survival while clicking the heels of their ruby slippers together, mumbling,"There's no place like home, there's no place like hime...if we could all just come home the wicked witch won't follow me there.....like they did on 9/11!


Whether you like it or not....whether you believe it or not....these guys want you dead for no other reason than that you BREATHE and are NOT Muslim!
 
I'm not fighting to get illegals here.

Hey Iriemon, your precious Dems may not be fighting to get illegals here (though they don't mind signing them up on voter sheets while they march carrying Anti-US signs), but the Democrats aren't touching the illegal alien issue with a 40-foot ple during their '100-BS-Legislative-Blitzkrieg'! The news broke a few days ago about how an armed band of illegals actually fired on and drove our national Guard back as they crossed into the US - a war, and full-scale invasion of the U.S. Are the Dems gonna hold an emergency session of Congress? Are they even going to discuss it? NOPE! They would rather raise minimum wage for the little people so small business will actually have to lay off a 'little person or two' in order to pay the increased salary of the others!

You say the GOP is embracing the illegal invasion, but as you guys have bragged - YOU have the power! turning your backs on the problem now means its YOUR embrace of the illegal invasion! Have a nice day...or at least 100 hours!
 
Hey Iriemon, your precious Democrats may not be fighting to get illegals here (though they don't mind signing them up on voter sheets while they march carrying Anti-US signs), but the Democrats aren't touching the illegal alien issue with a 40-foot ple during their '100-BS-Legislative-Blitzkrieg'! The news broke a few days ago about how an armed band of illegals actually fired on and drove our national Guard back as they crossed into the US - a war, and full-scale invasion of the U.S. Are the Dems gonna hold an emergency session of Congress? Are they even going to discuss it? NOPE! They would rather raise minimum wage for the little people so small business will actually have to lay off a 'little person or two' in order to pay the increased salary of the others!

You say the GOP is embracing the illegal invasion, but as you guys have bragged - YOU have the power! turning your backs on the problem now means its YOUR embrace of the illegal invasion! Have a nice day...or at least 100 hours!

Boy, what the hell are you talking about!? LMFAO!

I say "the GOP is embracing illegal invasion"? I have the power? LOL! You need to lay off the hootch!
 
Folks we are (whether we like it or not) in a war situation (albeit with a very small number of Terrorist organizations).
These ppl want several things.
1) Removal of US troops from anywhere outside of the US
2) Removal of US and western support for Israel.
3) Removal of any Government that allies itself with democratic ideals.
4) Installation of their brand of religion into every country in the entire world.
5) Law to be conducted by their religious beliefs.
6) Forced if necessary change of belief so that everyone swears to believe and follow dictats of their religion (whatever that may be).
Whether you are a Liberal, Conservative or whatever ism you prefer to follow or believe in, if you are willing to give up your freedoms, freedoms that were gained for you by your antecedants giving their lives in a variety of wars, then I would suggest you go over to the enemy.
If however you are prepared as were your parents, their parents, then you will perforce be compelled to face this latest threat to our civilization and way of life.
This will inevitably mean that the war be fought in many ways that are distateful to us, but will be necessary if we are to defeat those that would seek to change our way of life.
I am by no means a supporter of the war in Iraq, be that as it may, we are at war with Terrorists, we must win or our way of life changes forever.
Being a Liberal will cut no ice should Terrorists confront you, in fact Neo-Cons will be more likely to be spared.
As President Bush has said, We Have No Choice.
 
Folks we are (whether we like it or not) in a war situation (albeit with a very small number of Terrorist organizations).
These ppl want several things.
1) Removal of US troops from anywhere outside of the US
2) Removal of US and western support for Israel.
3) Removal of any Government that allies itself with democratic ideals.
4) Installation of their brand of religion into every country in the entire world.
5) Law to be conducted by their religious beliefs.
6) Forced if necessary change of belief so that everyone swears to believe and follow dictats of their religion (whatever that may be).
Whether you are a Liberal, Conservative or whatever ism you prefer to follow or believe in, if you are willing to give up your freedoms, freedoms that were gained for you by your antecedants giving their lives in a variety of wars, then I would suggest you go over to the enemy.
If however you are prepared as were your parents, their parents, then you will perforce be compelled to face this latest threat to our civilization and way of life.
This will inevitably mean that the war be fought in many ways that are distateful to us, but will be necessary if we are to defeat those that would seek to change our way of life.
I am by no means a supporter of the war in Iraq, be that as it may, we are at war with Terrorists, we must win or our way of life changes forever.
Being a Liberal will cut no ice should Terrorists confront you, in fact Neo-Cons will be more likely to be spared.
As President Bush has said, We Have No Choice.

If, as you state initially, the number of people who hold these beliefs is very small, then what is the basis for this grand war you are promoting? And how will that serve our objective? Should our objective be to reduce the number of people that hold these beliefs and those who support them as much as possible? If we go around making war on everyone, do you think that maybe there will be *more* people who hold those beliefs and people who support them? Wouldn't that be *contrary* to our objective? Isn't that maybe what is happening now?
 
If, as you state initially, the number of people who hold these beliefs is very small, then what is the basis for this grand war you are promoting? And how will that serve our objective? Should our objective be to reduce the number of people that hold these beliefs and those who support them as much as possible? If we go around making war on everyone, do you think that maybe there will be *more* people who hold those beliefs and people who support them? Wouldn't that be *contrary* to our objective? Isn't that maybe what is happening now?

As far as terrorists confronting me, hell to be honest I'm far more concerned about my high blood pressure at the moment.
 
And do you approve of the NOTHING done in response ?

Was the policy of allowing a nation to commit acts of war on the U.S. indefinitely with no consequence one you were in favor of ?

If not, do you then say that the proper response is to make war back ?

If so, what is your problem with . . .



So which is it Irie ? Do you support doing nothing to Iran while they commit acts of war on us ? (the previous plan) Or do you favor hitting back ? (the new plan)

We didn't exactly let Iran off the hook after 1979.

We supported Iraq in the war it started with Iran in 1980, gave Iraq intelligence and equipment, gave it money and debt guarantees, and took it off our list of terrorist nations, even though we knew that Iraq was using chemical weapons against the Iranians. May not be what you had in mind, but that's a real response. Reagan didn't want to openly attack Iran, it wouldn't have been smart.
 
*buzzer* Nope, sorry, incorrect. OBL, Zarqawi, and the leader of Iraq - they have all said that the goal of their Jihad, their one desire is to create a world that is Muslim-ONLY, that if you don't convert you are killed!
Do you even know what the word 'Jihad' means? Considering what you wrote, I'm guessing not. A Jihad is not the Muslim equivalent to a Crusade. They are entirely different. A Crusade, as we all know, is a holy war in which you go out and attack the enemies of your religion, often in order to take some holy place from their control. A Jihad on the other hand is a defensive war in order to protect Islamic areas. Guess what - the West is not an Islamic area and never has been.

Iran's leader has PROMISED to wipe Israel off the face of the eart,
*buzzer* Wrong again. If you actually read the entire quote in context, not take the little piece that the yellow journalists at Fox News give you as the whole story, then you'd know that he was referring to what Iran would do if the USA and Israel attacked Iran.

to come after the U.S. and do the same once Israel is eliminated because, after Israel in their own backyard, the U.S. is the only REAL threat to them reaching that goal of 1 Muslim-only world!
Which they have never worked towards. Ever. The reason we are a threat is that we are supporting secular or otherwise unacceptable (in their view) gov'ts in the Mid East and other heavily Islamic areas (we'll get to your strawman about Ethopia later).

When the leader of a country who has already helped the perpetrators of 9/11
Any proof of this? No, probably not. Don't talk about 9/11. The government with the most blood on its hands in that attack is our own. Or are you telling me that Iran called NORAD and had them stand down?

get into our country secretly tells you that he is going to nuke Israel and the US while he is developing the ability to do so.....
Wrong again. Iran has never said it had nuclear weapons, nor was even working towards them. Even the frickin' CIA has admitted in their own reports that there is "no evidence" at all that Iran is moving towards weaponizing uranium.

I pay attention and tend to believe him.
You aren't paying very good attention, apparently.

When he/Iran has their fingerprints on Islamic violence/enslavement/genocide across the globe (Israel, Lebanon, HOA, Afghanistan, Iraq....) and threatens us....I tend to believe him/them!
No, you tend to believe what the mass media spoon feeds you about Iran while they help Mr. Bush prepare to throw the USA into ANOTHER senseless war.

You demonstrate the same ignorance that many of our Democratic Party representatives do - they believe that all we have to do is come home, become isolationists, that the terrorists will like us more, will treat us with respect and dignity, and will leave us alone!
Rolling. On. The. Floor. Laughing. My. ***. Off. Democrats = isolationists? Yeah, maybe in 1807. But damn sure not in 2007. I'm not even going to point out how interventionist and internationalist the Democratic Party is, because it would take too long and I don't have the energy to point out something that should be given.

These are the guys who beheaded our troops on TV while our politicians were screaming torture about playing music too loud, giving detainees better food than our troops in the field, and for moving a Koran during a cell inspection!
Hey, guess what, they are beheading our troops because our troops are in their HOMELAND. They don't come to Anytown, USA and go off beheading National Guardsmen. Stop with your appeals to emotion and pay attention to what I've been saying.

These are the guys who slaughtered some 1500 of their own men, women, and children recently to frame the US!
ZOMG. Where did that happen again? Ah yes, in THEIR LAND. Yet again, you fail to recognize the most fundamental point I have made.

These are the same people who committed 9/11.
Maybe they did. But even if they did, the reason for it was to get us out of their lands, and to get us to stop supporting what they consider illegal governments - especially Israel.

And these are the same people who have promised to come back HERE and nuke us/finish us off!
Who is doing all this 'we will nuke you' promising? The only people I've ever heard even consider terrorist nuclear attacks a threat are the people in our propaganda machine -erm- media.

So please forgive me if I don't buy the 'Let's just bring everyone back home, change our name to Finland, and everything will be fine' bit!
Hey, you can have endless wars against fanatical opponents. I'd prefer a safer environment to live in, but I don't have the desire to learn Finnish, so I guess I'll just have to give up all my rights so my awesome government can keep me safe from the baddies.

Finland?!
Indeed. A very uninvolved nation, and one that has yet to suffer an attack by Muslim extremists that I'm aware of.

How about the Muslim riots in France?
The ones caused by the French trying to treat them like second-class citizens? Kinda like how African-Americans in this country were rioting in the first half of the 20th century? But you probably think that they had no right to do that either.

france are the biggest weapons whores on the planet, had troops on the groun in the early days of the Iraq war helping Hussein,
We sold him weapons pre-Gulf War, in mass amounts. In fact, most of the biological/chemical weapons he used were supplied by us, along with many of the supplies used in his aggressive war against Iran.

have been selling weapons to the Insurgents, Hezbollah, Iran, and the Muslims who have been committing the genocide down in Africa for years
The insurgents they've been selling weapons to are the anti-Sudanese militias in Darfur, I don't believe they've ever sold weapons to Hezbollah, selling weapons to nations is no crime and we do it all the time, and these Muslims committing genocide in Africa is I'm sure deliberately vague.

- Chirac has been pleading their case for years,
*buzzer* No sir. France has threatened a NUCLEAR ATTACK on states that harbor terrorists. So this 'support' that you seem to have imaginated is probably from their disagreements about going to war in Iraq, probably due to the fact that IRAQ HAD NO CONNECTIONS TO TERRORISM.

but all of a sudden they turned on France and brought the nation to a stand-still, darn near threatening their goverment for a bit.
They (being the terrorists I assume) didn't turn on anyone. France never supported them. France has been a staunch ally of the USA for over one hundred years and is a large part of NATO.

(Their only mistake is that they played their hand too soon!) No one - westerner - has been a bigger friend than France, but it ain't about 'friends'!
The USA's 'War on Terror' has gotten terrorist organizations more recruits than ever before imagined. If anyone is helping terrorism prosper, it is America and Israel.

If you are not Muslim, you are an INFIDEL and MUST DIE! Get it through your head!
If you infringe on their holy lands and immediate surrounding areas. If you don't, then you can be infidels all you want.

How about Ethiopia! Iran (proven) has 'advisors' (who happen to be in the Iranian military) down in Africa assisting the genocidal Muslims hwo have been killing anyone NON-Muslim.
Ethopia has a huge Muslim population. Their government is not following Islamic law. The terrorists are upset, just like they are with every other nation with those circumstances. I've explained this already.

france, BTW, was exposed for having been selling weapons to the genocidal terrorists while blocking the U.N. from sending as much as a 'fact finding' team down there let alone anyreal help.
Selling weapons to people committing genocide...France sounds more like the USA all the time! And speaking of arming radical Muslims, remember who armed the Taliban and most other radical Muslim groups in the Mid East. Remember? Haha, yes, good job USA!

Ethiopia just recently sent in troops to help the refugees and stop at least PART of the genocide! Africa - NOT the MIDDLE EAST!
If you'd actually read my posts instead of just quoting and responding to something that you glanced over, you'd noticed I'd not said they never targeted anything in Africa. The reason? Some areas in Africa are heavily Muslim, and Ethopia is a Muslim holy place for goodness sake. I mean, seriously now. Know your stuff before you come in with 'But that's not part of their goal!!1'

Al Qaeda and Syria just called for Al Qaeda and all Muslims to launch suicide/terrorist attacks against Ethiopia for trying to intervene!
Al-Qaeda called for Al-Qaeda to do something? Erm, what? Oh yeah, that's probably because it isn't an uber sophisticated worldwide terrorist organization with splinter cells under a direct chain of command all the way to OBL. Al-Qaeda is a network of terrorist organizations that the propagandists in Washington have connected arbitarily to make the impression of a threatening enemy where one doesn't exist. It's just like the Cold War parnoids who thought that the Soviets had super-weapons of doom that were decades ahead of the West. Wrong, and made up to scare the American people. "Al-Qaeda" doesn't exist, the term wasn't used by anyone in this "organization" until the USA started using it, and the world only knew of these terrorists by that name - the terrorists used the name so that everyone would know what they were talking about. But I digress. Terrorists will be terrorists. They launch suicide attacks against people who greatly offend their values. That's what they do. But again, it isn't for some world domination of the Muslim faith - it is simply to try to force Mid East AND OTHER HEAVILY MUSLIM AREAS (added emphasis so you can't miss it) governments to adopt their ultra-conservative views and be governed by Islamic Law.

Today's Muslim Extremist threat is almost no different and certainly (arguably) just as dangerous - if not MORE so - than Hitler and the Nazi movement to take over the world, resulting in WW2.
I find myself needing to rearrange furniture in my house so that I can have enough room when I start reading your posts. Muslims are not anywhere near the same nor are they nearly as dangerous to the world. I'm not even going to waste my time pointing out the stupidity of that statement.

One of the main differences right now is that Iran and Syria are not DIRECTLY raising their nation's flags amongst the ranks of the insurgent and terrorist armies they are having wage their war...a war that has been going on for a while and is most certainly ALREADY a World-war.
It is only a world war because the West made it one. From fulfilling the wishes of the Zionists to overthrowing rightful, democratic governments to trying to convert the conservative Muslims of the Middle East to our culture the West is at fault for bringing the wrath of Islamics upon themselves. We didn't think they'd fight back, because they had been our peaceful servants for so long already. We were wrong.
 
Back
Top Bottom