- Joined
- Mar 6, 2011
- Messages
- 36,106
- Reaction score
- 27,791
- Location
- US of A
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
More trump hating folks, how dare they find against the Donald.Literally just issued, I'll post a news page once one is made.
For now, here's the actual ruling: https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf
Relevant portion begins on Page 25:
Underlying the issues in this case is the notion that “the powers properly belonging to one of the departments ought not to be directly and completely administered by either of the other departments.” Federalist No. 48 (James Madison). Because of the Constitution’s express allocation of the tariff power to Congress, see U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 1, we do not read IEEPA to delegate an unbounded tariff authority to the President. We instead read IEEPA’s provisions to impose meaningful limits on any such authority it confers. Two are relevant here. First, § 1702’s delegation of a power to “regulate . . . importation,” read in light of its legislative history and Congress’s enactment of more narrow, non-emergency legislation, at the very least does not authorize the President to impose unbounded tariffs. The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariffs lack any identifiable limits and thus fall outside the scope of § 1702. Second, IEEPA’s limited authorities may be exercised only to “deal with an unusual and extraordinary threat with respect to which a national emergency has been declared . . . and may not be exercised for any other purpose.” 50 U.S.C. § 1701(b) (emphasis added). As the Trafficking Tariffs do not meet that .condition, they fall outside the scope of § 1701.
I'm sure Trump will appeal.
Literally just issued, I'll post a news page once one is made.
For now, here's the actual ruling: https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf
Relevant portion begins on Page 25:
Underlying the issues in this case is the notion that “the powers properly belonging to one of the departments ought not to be directly and completely administered by either of the other departments.” Federalist No. 48 (James Madison). Because of the Constitution’s express allocation of the tariff power to Congress, see U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 1, we do not read IEEPA to delegate an unbounded tariff authority to the President. We instead read IEEPA’s provisions to impose meaningful limits on any such authority it confers. Two are relevant here. First, § 1702’s delegation of a power to “regulate . . . importation,” read in light of its legislative history and Congress’s enactment of more narrow, non-emergency legislation, at the very least does not authorize the President to impose unbounded tariffs. The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariffs lack any identifiable limits and thus fall outside the scope of § 1702. Second, IEEPA’s limited authorities may be exercised only to “deal with an unusual and extraordinary threat with respect to which a national emergency has been declared . . . and may not be exercised for any other purpose.” 50 U.S.C. § 1701(b) (emphasis added). As the Trafficking Tariffs do not meet that .condition, they fall outside the scope of § 1701.
I'm sure Trump will appeal.
I was just about to post this. The only way the felon can legally impose tariffs, as it turns out, is if Congress pass "unbounded tariffs" is if Congress passes an "Emergency Economic Powers Act". I don't recall anyone here mentioning Congress passing such an act. Has anyone heard of the act being passed? Anyone? Buehler? Buehler? Buehler?Literally just issued, I'll post a news page once one is made.
For now, here's the actual ruling: https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf
Relevant portion begins on Page 25:
Underlying the issues in this case is the notion that “the powers properly belonging to one of the departments ought not to be directly and completely administered by either of the other departments.” Federalist No. 48 (James Madison). Because of the Constitution’s express allocation of the tariff power to Congress, see U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 1, we do not read IEEPA to delegate an unbounded tariff authority to the President. We instead read IEEPA’s provisions to impose meaningful limits on any such authority it confers. Two are relevant here. First, § 1702’s delegation of a power to “regulate . . . importation,” read in light of its legislative history and Congress’s enactment of more narrow, non-emergency legislation, at the very least does not authorize the President to impose unbounded tariffs. The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariffs lack any identifiable limits and thus fall outside the scope of § 1702. Second, IEEPA’s limited authorities may be exercised only to “deal with an unusual and extraordinary threat with respect to which a national emergency has been declared . . . and may not be exercised for any other purpose.” 50 U.S.C. § 1701(b) (emphasis added). As the Trafficking Tariffs do not meet that .condition, they fall outside the scope of § 1701.
I'm sure Trump will appeal.
shrug...Literally just issued, I'll post a news page once one is made.
For now, here's the actual ruling: https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf
Relevant portion begins on Page 25:
Underlying the issues in this case is the notion that “the powers properly belonging to one of the departments ought not to be directly and completely administered by either of the other departments.” Federalist No. 48 (James Madison). Because of the Constitution’s express allocation of the tariff power to Congress, see U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 1, we do not read IEEPA to delegate an unbounded tariff authority to the President. We instead read IEEPA’s provisions to impose meaningful limits on any such authority it confers. Two are relevant here. First, § 1702’s delegation of a power to “regulate . . . importation,” read in light of its legislative history and Congress’s enactment of more narrow, non-emergency legislation, at the very least does not authorize the President to impose unbounded tariffs. The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariffs lack any identifiable limits and thus fall outside the scope of § 1702. Second, IEEPA’s limited authorities may be exercised only to “deal with an unusual and extraordinary threat with respect to which a national emergency has been declared . . . and may not be exercised for any other purpose.” 50 U.S.C. § 1701(b) (emphasis added). As the Trafficking Tariffs do not meet that .condition, they fall outside the scope of § 1701.
I'm sure Trump will appeal.
That's not their style.Time for MAGA to riot and beat some cops I guess
Says someone that knew about the January 6 right wing scumbag riot a day or two before it occurred.That's not their style.
MAGA doesn't operate like Antifa.
Yes, because Trump can do no wrong.shrug...
More lawfare for the Supremes to deal with.
Literally just issued, I'll post a news page once one is made.
For now, here's the actual ruling: https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf
Relevant portion begins on Page 25:
Underlying the issues in this case is the notion that “the powers properly belonging to one of the departments ought not to be directly and completely administered by either of the other departments.” Federalist No. 48 (James Madison). Because of the Constitution’s express allocation of the tariff power to Congress, see U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 1, we do not read IEEPA to delegate an unbounded tariff authority to the President. We instead read IEEPA’s provisions to impose meaningful limits on any such authority it confers. Two are relevant here. First, § 1702’s delegation of a power to “regulate . . . importation,” read in light of its legislative history and Congress’s enactment of more narrow, non-emergency legislation, at the very least does not authorize the President to impose unbounded tariffs. The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariffs lack any identifiable limits and thus fall outside the scope of § 1702. Second, IEEPA’s limited authorities may be exercised only to “deal with an unusual and extraordinary threat with respect to which a national emergency has been declared . . . and may not be exercised for any other purpose.” 50 U.S.C. § 1701(b) (emphasis added). As the Trafficking Tariffs do not meet that .condition, they fall outside the scope of § 1701.
I'm sure Trump will appeal.
???Says someone that knew about the January 6 right wing scumbag riot a day or two before it occurred.
He doesn't have to. Those who collect the tariffs are now breaking the law and are subject to the penalties thereof.Wow! Just saw it! Glad i checked before I posted?
Will Trump obey the court?
I'm guessing not . . .
Noooooooooo!!!!
They're going to literally save Trump from himself.
Honestly thought we were just ignoring the fact that he obviously doesn’t have the authority to do any of this. Perhaps we will yet.
We're getting closer and closer to an undeniable constitutional crisis.
I guarantee you MAGA-Republican-Scum will say "so what?" and/or lie.
You know what I’m talking about and we’ve been over this.???
If you are talking about me...stop lying.
That's not their style.
MAGA doesn't operate like Antifa.
Don't you ever get tired of wanting a dictator to run your life?shrug...
More lawfare for the Supremes to deal with.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?