• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

US Capitol rioter who tried to flee to Switzerland is jailed pre-trial

106.jpg




I haven't seen many things more shameful & disgusting than the actions in these images. These individuals have no right calling themselves 'Americans', 'patriots', or any of the other lies they delude themselves with.
 
The Federal courts don't even pretend to be legitimate anymore. There has been no trial or even plea entered, with the Defendant's attorney arguing against guilt. The judge, however, in write declared the Defendant is guilt and the allegations of the prosecution are factually true - despite no evidence or witnesses every presented. Basically, the prosecutor and judge pre-trial formally and in writing agreed the Defendant is guilty exactly as charged.

The judge wrote this:

"Judge Emmet Sullivan said Jeffrey Sabol was too dangerous to release due to the flight risk and because he might continue his fight against "perceived tyranny" once he is out of jail.
"He stripped a vulnerable police officer of his police baton," Sullivan wrote in a 64-page ruling. "He then used that stolen police baton to force another officer away from his post and into a mob of rioters who proceeded to viciously attack him, leaving him bleeding from the head."

The judge does not even pretend the be impartial and instead wrote 64 pages of how he has found the has pretrial found the Defendant guilty in 64 pages of a pre-trial finding of guilt.

I see no reason for that judge to bother with a trial since the judge has declared officially and publicly in writing that the Defense lawyer's argument is false, there is no reason for any evidence whatsoever since the judge is the police, the investigator, the prosecutor and the judge - and has already found the Defendant guilty as accused.

On the federal level in any case with any political implications, there is no rule of law, no Judicial Cannons of Ethics, no Rules of Court and no Rules of Evidence. Increasingly Federal judges are not different than Nazi judges conducting Nazi trials - for which the only purpose of the trial is for the judge to rant and and berate the accused - determined to be guilty before entering the courtroom.

Of course the Nazi anti-law judge is a Democratic appointee.
 
Back
Top Bottom