• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

US a 'puppetmaster'? (1 Viewer)

It's about ending a war on religious nut cases, and they should all burn in hell, and with the help of those weapons, God willing, they will!
 
Its the dilemna of the US. Israel is an ally. So they support Israel by sending them bombs. Yet the US is generous and cares about other nations so they help the people that their allies hurt.

Its not necessarily sick.. odd though.
 
its called capitalism - making money off of people dieing.
 
clone said:
its called capitalism - making money off of people dieing.

That's not -quite- what capitalism is. Unless you own a funeral parlor.
 
Kelzie said:
That's not -quite- what capitalism is. Unless you own a funeral parlor.
ya ur right its what selling wepons to someone is making money of killing.
 
nogoodname said:
ya ur right its what selling wepons to someone is making money of killing.

No, again. A transfer of weapons can be capitalist or socialist or communist or any economic system you can think of. And technically you're not making money off of killing, you're making money off of selling weapons. If you sell someone a car and they run pedestrians over with it, you are not making money by killing. Now if you're a hitman...
 
Kelzie said:
No, again. A transfer of weapons can be capitalist or socialist or communist or any economic system you can think of. And technically you're not making money off of killing, you're making money off of selling weapons. If you sell someone a car and they run pedestrians over with it, you are not making money by killing. Now if you're a hitman...
ok yea their just using those wepons to play with other people right? I mean guns arnt wepons they arnt used to kill people? God dont be so naive.
 
nogoodname said:
ok yea their just using those wepons to play with other people right? I mean guns arnt wepons they arnt used to kill people? God dont be so naive.

Guns can be used to kill people. Just like cars and planes and trees and dogs. Are guns meant to be used to kill people? I don't think that can be argued. A gun is just a tool, like a missile. The fault of a person's death lies in the hands of the one who used it, not the one who sold it.

And in the future, please refrain from personal attacks. It's really not so difficult to be nice.
 
Kelzie said:
Guns can be used to kill people. Just like cars and planes and trees and dogs. Are guns meant to be used to kill people? I don't think that can be argued. A gun is just a tool, like a missile. The fault of a person's death lies in the hands of the one who used it, not the one who sold it.

And in the future, please refrain from personal attacks. It's really not so difficult to be nice.
Whats the other use of guns then killing? oh wow a gun compared ot a missile they are both used and made to kill people one just kills more in one hit.
 
nogoodname said:
Whats the other use of guns then killing? oh wow a gun compared ot a missile they are both used and made to kill people one just kills more in one hit.

Guns have many uses. Hunting animals, stress release and defense would be just a few. Missiles act in much the same way, as deterrence. If a nation has enough of them, they don't get messed by other nations. Take as an example, the US. No nation in their right mind would attack us because of our military power. Just having it does not mean we have to use it to kill people, besides the fact that missiles are often used to target infrastructure.

And again with the sarcastic nastiness. It won't kill you to be nice, I swear.
 
Kelzie said:
Guns have many uses. Hunting animals, stress release and defense would be just a few. Missiles act in much the same way, as deterrence. If a nation has enough of them, they don't get messed by other nations. Take as an example, the US. No nation in their right mind would attack us because of our military power. Just having it does not mean we have to use it to kill people, besides the fact that missiles are often used to target infrastructure.

And again with the sarcastic nastiness. It won't kill you to be nice, I swear.
I'm not being sarcastic sorry if comes like that I'm being serious. OK lets get off guns and onto missiles. When has missiles been used besides testing(which intends the use to test on how much it can kill) and killing.
 
nogoodname said:
I'm not being sarcastic sorry if comes like that I'm being serious. OK lets get off guns and onto missiles. When has missiles been used besides testing(which intends the use to test on how much it can kill) and killing.

That's the biggest problem with history right there. We never know what hasn't happened. I can't tell you how many times a particular country having missiles deterred another from attacking, because it's a negative that is not recorded. It does happen though (or not as the case were). A criminal will be much less likely to break into someone's house if he knows they have a gun. Likewise, a nation will rarely antagonize another with superior fire power. Leaders don't start wars they aren't sure about winning.
 
Kelzie said:
That's the biggest problem with history right there. We never know what hasn't happened. I can't tell you how many times a particular country having missiles deterred another from attacking, because it's a negative that is not recorded. It does happen though (or not as the case were). A criminal will be much less likely to break into someone's house if he knows they have a gun. Likewise, a nation will rarely antagonize another with superior fire power. Leaders don't start wars they aren't sure about winning.
Thats like me picking a fight with a baby.
 
Kelzie said:
Guns can be used to kill people. Just like cars and planes and trees and dogs. Are guns meant to be used to kill people? I don't think that can be argued. A gun is just a tool, like a missile. The fault of a person's death lies in the hands of the one who used it, not the one who sold it.

And in the future, please refrain from personal attacks. It's really not so difficult to be nice.
Umm..Kelz.. I gotta ask... How do you kill someone with a tree? :confused:
 
JamesRichards said:
Umm..Kelz.. I gotta ask... How do you kill someone with a tree? :confused:

Duh, if it falls on them! Someone else said you can kill someone with a Mountain Dew can. I'd be interested to see how that would work.
 
Kelzie said:
Duh, if it falls on them! Someone else said you can kill someone with a Mountain Dew can. I'd be interested to see how that would work.


1 -- chill mountain Dew to 33 degrees

2 -- locate Chomskyite

3-- open can to let it breathe a little

4 -- listen to long-winded political diatribe by which time, Dew will be drinkable

5 -- have Chomskyite drink Dew to relieve dryness in throat.

6 -- wait 60 seconds for caffeine to kick in

7-- Bring out a picture of Ann Coulter

8 -- respond to doorbell ringing

9 -- say to ambulence personal "Aneurysm -- what Aneurysm"?
 
Gardener said:
1 -- chill mountain Dew to 33 degrees

2 -- locate Chomskyite

3-- open can to let it breathe a little

4 -- listen to long-winded political diatribe by which time, Dew will be drinkable

5 -- have Chomskyite drink Dew to relieve dryness in throat.

6 -- wait 60 seconds for caffeine to kick in

7-- Bring out a picture of Ann Coulter

8 -- respond to doorbell ringing

9 -- say to ambulence personal "Aneurysm -- what Aneurysm"?

:rofl So quick and witty. I want to be you when I grow up.
 
Kelzie said:
Duh, if it falls on them! Someone else said you can kill someone with a Mountain Dew can. I'd be interested to see how that would work.
Oh right, but isn't that technically the tree killing someone? I mean, aren't you talking about uses of guns? I was wondering how one actually utilises a tree as a lethal weapon.

I had visions of Osama ticking off a cosignment of supplies;

"Assault rifles, extra magazines, heavy machine guns, RPG rounds, trained attack dogs, 6 cases of Mountain Dew, tree. Wait a ******* minute! Where the hell is the tree I asked for! How are we supposed to wage a jihad without a tree! Bloody amateurs!"
 
JamesRichards said:
Oh right, but isn't that technically the tree killing someone? I mean, aren't you talking about uses of guns? I was wondering how one actually utilises a tree as a lethal weapon.

I had visions of Osama ticking off a cosignment of supplies;

"Assault rifles, extra magazines, heavy machine guns, RPG rounds, trained attack dogs, 6 cases of Mountain Dew, tree. Wait a ******* minute! Where the hell is the tree I asked for! How are we supposed to wage a jihad without a tree! Bloody amateurs!"

Well, I didn't say it wouldn't take a lot of planning for you to use a tree to kill someone. I mean, we're talking massive amounts of physics knowledge at a minimum. Of course, you could always hoist the tree above them and wait till they pass...

And why is everybody so funny today? It's making me feel incompetent.

Oh and hey. Mr. Brit. I'm not entirely sure Osama would say "bloody".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom