As National Hate Speech Rules go, Canada's seems the most sensible.
In Europe, Truth is Not a defense, tho Wilders was Acquitted using a 'public debate' exception:
The presiding judge said Wilders's remarks were sometimes "hurtful," "shocking" or "offensive," but that they were made in the context of a public debate about Muslim integration and multi-culturalism, and therefore not a criminal act.
Tho 'truth', as in Canada, would have been more accurate, the court's ruling was very sensible.
But much of what Wilders says about Islam/Muslims would have gotten him thrown off here.
So my questions:
1. If one were to say, and Many have, "Islam is inherently violent", or "Islam is Inordinately violent", or the Wilders-esque "the Koran reads like Mein Kampf"; are any of those now in violation?
2. Is this string/OP which Claims there are Racial differences in IQ still legal.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/scien...ences-average-iq-largely-genetic-w-957-a.html