• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Unhinged Trump -> begs for routers 11 times during his weekend rant

Eye witness affidavits.

What needs to be done is an examination of the routers to see if, in fact, they were connected to the internet.

For some reason, election boards are reluctant to allow an examination. It's as if they are trying to hide something.
And, they are bullshit. Any fool can do an affidavit.

None of them have the huevos to go under oath.
 
Why the fierce fight to prevent access to them? Why?
 
Where is your kraken now?
Shouldn't Dominion's libel suit against Powell et al be making its way to trial soon?
I'll bet Sidney will release the kraken then.....really.....she'll do it.....you just wait. LOL
 
CN isn't the topic...but you know they'll provide all the evidence necessary to support their findings.


That earlier audit was a crock of shit. They had no security...the doors to the room were wide open...the "auditors" had cell phones with them...and used them, they had Apple TV and Nintendo connected to the network and they didn't even examine all the machines...just a "sample".


Your own chart shows routers hooked up to the machines.

And yes...MCBOS needs to turn all the routers over...as the Senate subpoena demands...to PROVE whether their machines had internet access or not.

Why are they fighting so hard to avoid turning over the routers?

Turning over the County's routers to the Cyber Ninjas is a huge security risk. They are NOT certified auditors and in no way entitled access to the County's routers. People had cell phones during the Cyber Ninjas so-called audit.

"The observers noted multiple times that they saw cell phones on the audit floor, even though they are banned by the audit’s procedures. On one occasion, Ken Bennett, the Senate’s liaison to the auditors and a former secretary of state, had his phone on the floor. Another time, state Sen. Wendy Rogers had a cellphone in her back pocket. Rogers has made several trips to the audit floor, where she has served as hostess for GOP legislators from other states who wish to replicate Arizona’s audit in their states." Link
 
And, they are bullshit. Any fool can do an affidavit.

None of them have the huevos to go under oath.
Oh?

Who has refused to go under oath?
 
These right-wing nincompoops will never figure out how it was done. Jewish space lasers mind controlled voters to vote for Biden, and they didn't even realize it. There is no evidence left. They can look all they like at routers.
 
Why the heck should the Board have to hand over anything that these turkeys demand? CN has zero credentials and is not under contract to the State. It isn't even clear who is paying them and there are no defined parameters they must adhere to. It would be irresponsible of the Board to just hand over anything these guys ask for without a clear understanding of what they are going to do with them. These "auditors" should be forced into a court to explain exactly why they want the routers and what they intend to do with them. Not some vaguery exactly what they are going to do with them and for what purpose. Let a judge decide whether the request is valid but more importantly authorized by the State and not by Fann. I wonder if the Senate voted on this sham again what the outcome might be.

Nonetheless, it will not matter to Trumpers they will be sure to find an excuse to say that the "audit" was hindered by the predominantly Republican Board. I think the request for the routers was just that, a deliberate move on CN's and their secret financiers' part to make a request they knew would be refused and then claim obstruction and evidence that the Board is hiding something. All of this to really place a smokescreen in front of the fact they got nada. As we see from this thread their strategy is working but then again they know how malleable their target audience is, trump showed them.
 
everyone you are claiming submitted an affidavit.
When did they refuse to go under oath? What judge asked them to testify under oath?
 
And, they are bullshit. Any fool can do an affidavit.

None of them have the huevos to go under oath.
But isn't an affidavit a sworn written statement of facts, made under oath, and under penalty of perjury?
 
But isn't an affidavit a sworn written statement of facts, made under oath, and under penalty of perjury?
Not the same as swearing in a court of law. No one cares about an affidavit. They won't testify, Trump's lawyers lost what, 71 cases?

Wanna know why? They were all bullshit.
 
Not the same as swearing in a court of law. No one cares about an affidavit. They won't testify, Trump's lawyers lost what, 71 cases?

Wanna know why? They were all bullshit.
A sworn affidavit IS treated as evidence. The person that signed the affidavit can be called as a witness during a trial. You do realize a witness can either provide oral or written testimony in a court of law. In all cases it is done under oath and under the threat of perjury.
 
A sworn affidavit IS treated as evidence. The person that signed the affidavit can be called as a witness during a trial. You do realize a witness can either provide oral or written testimony in a court of law. In all cases it is done under oath and under the threat of perjury.
But, they won't show up, because they made up bullshit.

Here are a few examples of the nutjobs that filed affidavits and spoke at hearings...

 
Eye witness affidavits.

What needs to be done is an examination of the routers to see if, in fact, they were connected to the internet.

For some reason, election boards are reluctant to allow an examination. It's as if they are trying to hide something.
You mean the "switches" that were used in an "air gap" system?

Didn't they have access to those? Why inspect equipment that was not part of the voting system?
Prior technical reviews show the system was not hooked up to the internet.
Why do you ignore those reports. Can you prove they are wrong?
 
Those reasons are bullshit.

What is their REAL reason? I'm thinking a forensic examination of the routers will give us the reaon.

I agree. But for this audit, at least, the routers will not be examined. It's up to the AZ Senate to pursue it, if they choose to.
 
Why the fierce fight to prevent access to them? Why?

Here is a thought, maybe because they have nothing to do with the voting equipment.

What evidence does Cyber Ninjas have that the routers were involved.
Does Cyber Ninjas know what an "air gap" set is? Do they know the difference between a "switch" and a "router"

/sarcasm on
Maybe Cyber Ninjas should inspect every modem and router (wifi or not) that exists in Maricopa County. Who knows what may be involved in the election fraud.
That includes computer equipment in private homes. Never know who might have hooked into a system that was not hooked up to the net.:LOL:
 
When did they refuse to go under oath? What judge asked them to testify under oath?
as I keep pointing out, nobody has sworn under oath to anything. Affidavits are completely meaningless. They are nothing but a written accusation. Every single affidavit that was submitted in court, was laughed out by mostly republican judges, lol.
 
Fann issued new subpoenas. She has taken the bait by Logan , hook, line and sinker. How the Republican Party in Arizona has fallen.


They'll have to go to court to get subpoenas with teeth if they're serious. I've thought for some time now that the GOP nationally is ineffective in representing their constituents. The AZ GOP is no different.

If the AZ GOP is convinced that Logan is a grifter, some evidence - hard evidence, not rumor and speculation - would be good. Otherwise, I'm going to ignore it.
 
Several routers have been indicted.
Rumor has it the "routers" are going to plead the 5th.

maybe "switches" dream of being a "router" someday when they grow up.
Do routers dream of electron sheep at night.?

:ROFLMAO:
 
Back
Top Bottom