Unbelievable ABC GW bias (1 Viewer)

[Stinger]

Witnessing the impact of global warming in your life?
ABC News wants to hear from you. We're currently producing a report on the increasing changes in our physical environment, and are looking for interesting examples of people coping with the differences in their daily lives. Has your life been directly affected by global warming?


http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=2094224&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312



Talk about bias'd, they make no bones about it. And these anecdotal stories which will most likely be those of the GW religion. And it will be reported as news. What about people who have seen nothing when it comes to GW?



Of and by the way, the "physical" changes everyday whether the temperature goes up or down.

 

[jfuh]

Witnessing the impact of global warming in your life?
ABC News wants to hear from you. We're currently producing a report on the increasing changes in our physical environment, and are looking for interesting examples of people coping with the differences in their daily lives. Has your life been directly affected by global warming?

http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=2094224&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312

Talk about bias'd, they make no bones about it. And these anecdotal stories which will most likely be those of the GW religion. And it will be reported as news. What about people who have seen nothing when it comes to GW?

Of and by the way, the "physical" changes everyday whether the temperature goes up or down.

The ABC questionare does not represent sound science on GW. But that's not what they're advertising it as. It's just a marketing campaign to get veiwers and increase sponsership of thier channel. If you've seen nothing, I'm sure they wouldn't mind you submitting a response. Perhaps you can ask Fox news to give a campaign against global warming.
"ARe there any effects of global warming on you?"
Then again they probably wouldn't say that because they'd be the laughing stock of the medial and scientific community. Oh wait they already are.


Nice try with the religous dogma, the only religious following I've seen thus far is your constant denial in the face of hard facts of global warming.

 

[Stinger]

The ABC questionare does not represent sound science on GW. But that's not what they're advertising it as.

It's a news story from a news organization and it's bogus.



Nice try with the religous dogma, the only religious following I've seen thus far is your constant denial in the face of hard facts of global warming.[/quote]

 

[Caine]

Witnessing the impact of global warming in your life?
ABC News wants to hear from you. We're currently producing a report on the increasing changes in our physical environment, and are looking for interesting examples of people coping with the differences in their daily lives. Has your life been directly affected by global warming?


http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=2094224&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312



Talk about bias'd, they make no bones about it. And these anecdotal stories which will most likely be those of the GW religion. And it will be reported as news. What about people who have seen nothing when it comes to GW?



Of and by the way, the "physical" changes everyday whether the temperature goes up or down.

In the words of Carlos Mencia:

"WHY THE **** IS THIS NEWS?"

 

[talloulou]

Well MSNBC has this as one of their top stories today....

Earth Warmest in 400 years..


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13474997/

 

[Caine]

Well MSNBC has this as one of their top stories today....

Earth Warmest in 400 years..


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13474997/

In the words of Carlos Mencia:

"WHY THE **** IS THIS NEWS?"

 

[Stinger]

Well MSNBC has this as one of their top stories today....

Earth Warmest in 400 years..


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13474997/

And how would they know since we do not have such accurate global measurements from 400 years ago, within .2 degrees. It's speculation. And of course they discount any evidence of other forces causing any warming blaming it all on human activity.

 

[::Major_Baker::]

And how would they know since we do not have such accurate global measurements from 400 years ago, within .2 degrees. It's speculation. And of course they discount any evidence of other forces causing any warming blaming it all on human activity.

why take the chance? How would it affect you to alter your lifestyle and thinking a bit to not only potentially decrease human effect on the climte, but also to take global power away from Saudi Arabia and its buddies?

 

[hipsterdufus]

why take the chance? How would it affect you to alter your lifestyle and thinking a bit to not only potentially decrease human effect on the climte, but also to take global power away from Saudi Arabia and its buddies?

So many in the GOP will take the chance with our future for two reasons:

1. They would have to join with Dems, who have been concerned about this issue for many years.

2. The religious right thinks the rapture's coming anyway. Why bother?

 

[Hoot]

why take the chance? How would it affect you to alter your lifestyle and thinking a bit to not only potentially decrease human effect on the climte, but also to take global power away from Saudi Arabia and its buddies?

Stinger would have to stop using his flourocarbon hairspray?

 

[Stinger]

why take the chance? How would it affect you to alter your lifestyle and thinking a bit to not only potentially decrease human effect on the climte, but also to take global power away from Saudi Arabia and its buddies?

Why invest the resources? What if we had said that in 1970 and heated up the globe to avert the coming ice age the same scientist were so adamant about then?

 

[jfuh]

Why invest the resources? What if we had said that in 1970 and heated up the globe to avert the coming ice age the same scientist were so adamant about then?

What resources will be invested? Investment leads to businesses, what drives businesses can't be a bad thing because businesess promote the economy and produce jobs. So what's so bad about investment and how would it be a waste?

Are the refuted bellbottom 70's the only argument you have against global warming - you need to keep up with the times bud, it's the 21st century now.