Absolutely yes. Plus, maybe even more importantly, those sheeply 3rd world public opinions that the US is somehow super fair in politics will then get a bite of reality.
Actually this whole story is BS, and the UN is NOT monitoring the US election. I'm sure you are disappointed.
From the UN's own presses:
Note to Demagogues: The UN is Not Monitoring the US Election | UN Dispatch
Yes it is the OSCE.. not the UN, but it is always the OSCE that does election monitoring for the UN.. /shrug.
Well the more you dig in to this, the more you will find out that the reason Albanians, Georgians, and other OSCE members are in the United States for this election is to A.) learn how an election ought to be run and B.) learn how to monitor their own elections and also C.) give pretext for the USA and other OSCE members to monitor elections where that monitoring is needed (Georgia, Albania, etc)
That shouldn't surprise anyone.You Heard It Here Folks, Tigger Admitting He Has Little Use For Democracy And Even Less For Freedom!!
I see. So you prefer the wisdom of insecure short men.The only real manner of conflict resolution between nations comes at the business end of a weapon. I believe it's Napoleon who once referred to artillery as "The Final Arguement of Kings."
.
I see. So you prefer the wisdom of insecure short men. We all know what happened to Napolean in the end don't we?
Please Don't tell me that you claim to be a Christian? What would little baby Jesus tell you to do?
You seem to detest democracy and embrace violence death greed and fascist ideologies.
Europeans prefer a weak United States, so that their own influence is relatively stronger. This is the reason Europeans love Obama.
Oh really... it couldn't be that they rely on our military bases stationed in just about every one of their countries, for military security... or that they rely on our economy for their own stability... No.. it must be because Obama makes us weaker.. even though you have absolutely no ****ing basis for that argument...
Aside from the fact that I've lived half my life in Europe, what would I know?
Europeans learn in their history books and from their grandparents about how Europe used to be the center of the world. The nations of Europe had great empires, they were influential economically, culturally, and militarily.
Today, a large number of Europeans are envious of American success. Due to their past, they feel entitled to be the kings of the world, and they view the United States with envy and fascination because of our current position.
Whenever America projects power in the world, Europeans don't like it. Even when it benefits them. Take Ronald Reagan, for instance. Europeans hated Reagan, even though he helped end communism and unify Germany.
Bush was the worst. First, he was a cowboy - the least European type of man. They couldn't relate to him. Second, he flaunted America's global power and took us to war.
Obama, on the other hand, is liked in Europe. He is understated about America's might, and he wants to draw down our military. Europeans like this.
It makes them feel like we're all on an even playing field.
Europe and their perception of us is quite different from Obama actually making us weaker. You must make that distinction.
only liberals vote early?
Aside from the fact that I've lived half my life in Europe, what would I know?
Europeans learn in their history books and from their grandparents about how Europe used to be the center of the world. The nations of Europe had great empires, they were influential economically, culturally, and militarily.
Today, a large number of Europeans are envious of American success. Due to their past, they feel entitled to be the kings of the world, and they view the United States with envy and fascination because of our current position.
Whenever America projects power in the world, Europeans don't like it. Even when it benefits them. Take Ronald Reagan, for instance. Europeans hated Reagan, even though he helped end communism and unify Germany.
Bush was the worst. First, he was a cowboy - the least European type of man. They couldn't relate to him. Second, he flaunted America's global power and took us to war.
Obama, on the other hand, is liked in Europe. He is understated about America's might, and he wants to draw down our military. Europeans like this.
I bet nothing!
Yes and that is factual.... and by the way it is the same stuff pretty much that American's learn...... its called history.
Only the right wing in Europe. The British Conservatives live in the past...Most of Europe have long accepted that their "Empire" is gone.. something that can not be said about Americans, who many deny they even have an Empire with colonies..
LOL generalising much? The problem is not that America projects power in the world, it is where and the double standards they project as well. Iraq... enough said.
Also Ronald Reagan was a right winger during a time of left wing politics in Europe.. is it a shocker they had issues with him? But hated.. hardly.
Bush was the worst, not because he was a cowboy, but because he was never elected.. yes I did that.. fact is Europeans are use to the person with most votes wins and that elections are near perfect.. the 2000 elections shattered that illusion about the US.... and then he went into Iraq pissing away all the goodwill he got from 9/11. And the add the arrogance of the Bush administration towards others... we had flashbacks to the bad old days of Empire..
Obama is tolerated because he is not Bush or the GOP. Dont think for a second he is loved or even liked in Europe. Sure even the British conservatives support him, but that is because the GOP and Romney are a danger to the world.
And I was right, you know very little about Europe.
No, like passing laws that prevent early voting but making specific allowances for only members of the military.
Supreme Court allows early voting in Ohio - The Hill - covering Congress, Politics, Political Campaigns and Capitol Hill | TheHill.com
only liberals vote early?
Why wouldn't members of the military get that exemption?
Military members should absolutely be allowed to participate in early voting.
But so should all other voters as well.
But if a state decided that in general they didn't want early voting, what's the problem with allowing the military to have it?
Because it disallows non-military voters from access to early voting, which is against the equal protection amendment of the Constitution.
Also, states don't want this - Republican politicians do.
Non-military and military are recognized as being different by the government. Military personnel are often precluded from voting simply by virtue of their service to the government. You don't support that government allowing them to be able to vote? You realize that the vast majority of active duty military are registered in their home states, not in the state of the garrison they are assigned to, right?
So you'd effectively disenfranchise people specifically because they're working for the very government the voting is about? You don't think that's hinky?
Non-military and military are recognized as being different by the government. Military personnel are often precluded from voting simply by virtue of their service to the government. You don't support that government allowing them to be able to vote? You realize that the vast majority of active duty military are registered in their home states, not in the state of the garrison they are assigned to, right?
So you'd effectively disenfranchise people specifically because they're working for the very government the voting is about? You don't think that's hinky?
No, because thats not my podition at all.
I think early voting should be allowed by all people.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?