• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UN Nuclear Watchdog Chief: ‘Night and Day’ Difference Between Iran’s Nuclear Capabilities Before and After US Strikes

trixare4kids

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 16, 2017
Messages
83,710
Reaction score
83,262
Location
Southern CA.
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Independent




I know who I'm going to believe. The report above. The detected radiation confirms Iran's centrifuge enrichment program was destroyed. It will be many moons before Iran will be near capacity. We all ought to pull together and feel thankful that
Trump did sent well trained undetected flyers to do the deed. God Bless our troops.
 





I know who I'm going to believe. The reports above. The detected radiation confirms Iran's centrifuge enrichment program was destroyed. It will be many moons before Iran will be near capacity if ever again. We all ought to pull together and feel thankful that Trump did well to send well trained undetected flyers to do the deed. God Bless our country, and our troops.
 
Last edited:
Oh come on, Trix. You’ve been here long enough that the ONLY news that’s fit to print is the stuff that blasts Trump.

It’s going to take a while to sort out exactly what was and wasn’t wrecked in Iran but it’s a good bet that, at minimum, they’ve got a lot of digging to do before they can even get into those places.
 

It doesn't. They can't confirm that by simply detecting some traces of localized radioactive leakage, and if that's what he's suggesting, then he's a source that's best ignored. They can only truly confirm what happened through satellite imagery and intelligence.

Beyond that, the UN is desperate to remain relevant, and that's not what our own intel believes.
 
The irony here is that Trix is openly declaring that she is going to trust the United Nations over the Trump Administration.
 
ummm... "freebeacon"

No thanks
 
Who in their right mind would even venture into the site? You have to first dig out the entrances. Also I have my doubts on the Bomb Damage Assessment (BDA). Analyst only know how to visually analyze damage caused by conventional weapons, not this brand new bunker buster bomb.
 
Now THIS is the right kind of news reporting. Credible people who are named and quoted.

Good job, President Trump.
 
Overall, we rate the Washington Free Beacon Right Biased based on story selection that favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to misleading and false claims.
 
 
You really should use a credible source.

If the people quoted are experts in their fields, it's quite possible you can find other articles in which their names are mentioned. Articles in sources that are reliable re factual reporting.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…