• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ukraine Defense Chief Says "Low Probability" Of Major Conflict With Russia, Contradicting Biden

Russia has been in Ukraine since 2014. If your yardstick for "minor incursion" includes the better part of a decade, then maybe buy a new yardstick.
if you want to talk Crimea then be prepared to defend Vicky Nuland.John McCain and Robert Kagan's role in Independence Square during the Euromaidan

the Rolling Stone lyric "made damn sure Pilate washed his hands and sealed his fate" come to mind- as we fomented a revolution from a protest thru a riot to a revolution.

Crimea became a forced moved (as in chess term) to secure Sevastopoll etc.
 
I like how you said "met with and began the process", because that allowed you to then conveniently ignore that not only did Trump increase sanctions against Russia, he killed a bunch of Russians in Syria.
🤡
Congress passed laws that prevented Trump from lifting Russian sanctions, with a veto proof majority. That's the reason Trump didn't lift the sanction - he couldn't. Trump didn't increase sanctions, Congress did. As a matter of fact, Trump lifted multiple sanctions de facto by refusing enforcement, including ones that were required by law.


The disconnect between rhetoric and action was typical of his administration. With the exception of Iran and (relatedly and to a much lesser extent) Israel, however the foreign policy overlap in the last couple of administrations is actually pretty high.
The disconnect was because Trump was a moronic madman, who often had subordinates that defied him, not because Trump secretly had some other desire. The man was such a buffoon, they had to keep out of high level discussions, because he'd agree to give away the store on the spot.

Maybe sit this one out and not try to claim a moral high ground. You'll just keep falling harder.
 
if you want to talk Crimea then be prepared to defend Vicky Nuland.John McCain and Robert Kagan's role in Independence Square during the Euromaidan

the Rolling Stone lyric "made damn sure Pilate washed his hands and sealed his fate" come to mind- as we fomented a revolution from a protest thru a riot to a revolution.

Crimea became a forced moved (as in chess term) to secure Sevastopoll etc.

I'm sure it made sense to you before you started typing it.
 
I'm sure it made sense to you before you started typing it.
im sure you gloss over stuff that doesnt fit your preconceptions or lack of native curiosity

was triggered by the west's attempt to pull Ukraine decisively into its orbit and defence structure, via an explicitly anti-Moscow EU association agreement. Its rejection led to the Maidan protests and the installation of an anti-Russian administration – rejected by half the country – that went on to sign the EU and International Monetary Fund agreements regardless.
 
im sure you gloss over stuff that doesnt fit your preconceptions or lack of native curiosity

was triggered by the west's attempt to pull Ukraine decisively into its orbit and defence structure, via an explicitly anti-Moscow EU association agreement. Its rejection led to the Maidan protests and the installation of an anti-Russian administration – rejected by half the country – that went on to sign the EU and International Monetary Fund agreements regardless.

I know that you just went to google and typed in something to get a link to support your opinion, but as an FYI on the side, you just chose a guy who is essentially a British Communist.

Well done, Comrade. You have seen the light. I will send you a link to our next super-secret weekly meeting. Bring a handful of grass for our potluck.

Topics for discussion will be: Why use toilet paper when we have hands? and Tofu: The Next Chicken?

Tucker Carlson creates strange bedfellows for Trump supporters.
 
Putin's just going to let that genocide of Russians slide, eh?
 
And I appreciate your answer about the Holodomor. Not Romney and all since.
....well, it is true that we often don't like to hear information that casts our tribe - or notable members of our tribe - in a bad light.

But, respectfully, you did ask if there was anything more timely; it so happens that there is.

A lot of Blue Tribe's recent anti-Russia stance appears to coincide with its partisan incentive structure (when Russia came to be seen as pro-Red-Tribe). Prior to that, their stance was anti-anti-Russia, because that was seen as the Red-Tribe position.

Russia itself didn't change, but domestic politics appears to have gone back and forth (before Romney was warning of the dangers of Russia, Bush W was claiming he'd "seen Putin's soul", or some such, and before that, Ted Kennedy was writing to the Soviets asking them to help him unseat Reagan, etc., so on, and so on).

We'd all be better off if we accepted the initial discomfort and cognitive dissonance and recognized that our "team" includes a lot of stupid people, and has made mistakes, and is likely currently making mistakes, and that the "other" team includes a lot of smart people, and has probably gotten some things right at times, and may have some things right, now....

But it would mean a higher loyalty than Devotion To The Tribe, and, that's a lot of people's highest value right now :(.
 
I'm so old, I can remember back when it was the Democrats who were anti-NATO, anti-US, pro-Russia.

I guess the right wing figured this century it was their turn?
The Democrats still are anti-US and pro-Russia as well as pro-China. That automatically makes them anti-NATO since the US is NATO.

NATO should have been abolished the instant the Warsaw Pact was dissolved in 1991. NATO's purpose ceased to be, and instead has become a vehicle for US hegemony. It doesn't even resemble the North Atlantic Treaty that it once was. None of the new members since 1991 are anywhere near the North Atlantic. NATO is nothing more than a tool for leftist Democrat filth to start another war.
 
The Democrats still are anti-US and pro-Russia as well as pro-China. That automatically makes them anti-NATO since the US is NATO.

.... @Glitch, how many Democrats are in your life, on a daily, regular basis? Like, how many do you know personally, well?
 
NATO has been trying to get the Ukraine to join since the Warsaw Pact fell in 1989. Those nations that refuse NATO get destroyed. Just ask Yugoslavia. Oh wait, that's right you can't because Clinton declared that Yugoslavia no longer exists.

After four consecutive years of media lies about Russian collusion, and you still believe what the enemy of the people tell you? That is simply pathetic.

That is why Poland, Hungry, and the Baltic nations joined NATO. They were coerced by the US.

"This issue was brought up in his expose given on December 21, 1991. “Poland will tighten its relations with the North-Atlantic Treaty Organisation. We believe it is a pillar of European security and the military presence of the US is a factor of that stability. This is why the government will continue developing ties with NATO... It will be a policy improving our security,” the then PM said. The Defence Minister Jan Parys said that “in a broader perspective” Poland wants to be a member of NATO."

This is true for the other nations you wrote about.


There was no coersion for any of the former Soviet Union nations to join.

You also claimed that NATO has been trying to get Ukraine to join.

Ukraine submitted an application to join in 2008 that is still pending.

Which nations were destroyed and who did it?

The NATO campaign in Yugoslavia was intended to have them withdraw troops from Kosovo.

A country must determine their own choice about whether or not to join NATO, and none has been coerced.
 
If Russia invades, the attacking force is outnumbered by the defending force. It would be disastrous for the aggressor. That is Military Strategy 101.

If Putin decides to invade, he will not only suffer a military defeat, but an economic calamity caused by Western sanctions as well. Russia's economy is vulnerable. It relies almost entirely on exporting energy products. That will come to an abrupt end if Russia invades, and Putin is not stupid.
President Biden told Americans that Putin has made up his mind. He will invade Ukraine, according to the President.

If Putin invades Ukraine, it would be the Soviet/Afghan War all over again, and with it, the collapse of the Soviet Union.

In April 2005, Putin said the Soviet collapse was a tragedy for Russians.

“First and foremost it is worth acknowledging that the demise of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century,” Putin said. “As for the Russian people, it became a genuine tragedy. Tens of millions of our fellow citizens and countrymen found themselves beyond the fringes of Russian territory.

“The epidemic of collapse has spilled over to Russia itself,” he said.

The Afghan fighting force was puny compared to the Ukrainian army, second in size in Europe to Russia's army.

The Soviet–Afghan War was a conflict wherein insurgent groups known collectively as the Mujahideen fought a nine-year guerrilla war against the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan (DRA) and the Soviet Army. Eventually the Soviet army had to withdraw in defeat.

The war was costly in bodies and cash, largely bankrupting the Soviet Union. Western sanctions contributed to the bankruptcy. Two years later the Soviet Union collapsed.

The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 was one of the biggest historic events of Twentieth Century. The occupation of Afghanistan caused irreversible internal conflicts between the Soviet republics and the Soviet government.

“First and foremost it is worth acknowledging that the demise of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century.”

Will Putin cause Russia to make the same mistake again?

Despite the words of our President, there are serious doubts.
 
"This issue was brought up in his expose given on December 21, 1991. “Poland will tighten its relations with the North-Atlantic Treaty Organisation. We believe it is a pillar of European security and the military presence of the US is a factor of that stability. This is why the government will continue developing ties with NATO... It will be a policy improving our security,” the then PM said. The Defence Minister Jan Parys said that “in a broader perspective” Poland wants to be a member of NATO."

This is true for the other nations you wrote about.


There was no coersion for any of the former Soviet Union nations to join.

You also claimed that NATO has been trying to get Ukraine to join.

Ukraine submitted an application to join in 2008 that is still pending.

Which nations were destroyed and who did it?

The NATO campaign in Yugoslavia was intended to have them withdraw troops from Kosovo.

A country must determine their own choice about whether or not to join NATO, and none has been coerced.
You really didn't expect Poland or Hungry to state that they were coerced into joining NATO by the US, did you? Of course they are going to claim it was their choice, but that is a lie to help them save face. When Yugoslavia refused to join NATO Clinton declared it non-existant in May 1999, before the US began its bombing campaign in Kosovo. The dismantling of Yugoslavia began with the Croatian ethnic cleansing by the Bosnians, and the Bosnian ethnic cleansing by the Serbs immediately after the fall of the Warsaw Pact.

Immediately after Clinton destroyed Yugoslavia for refusing to join NATO, Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania joined NATO within the next 5 years, seeing the outcome of those nations that defy the US. It is the US who is the threat here, not Russia. Specially the US when under the control of leftist filth, like Clinton, Obama, or Biden. You will notice that there was no "Ukraine" issues or other issues with any of the former Warsaw Pact nations when a Republican is President. Only when Democrats are President does NATO suddenly need to include all the former Warsaw Pact nations.

This is what makes the Democratic Party not just a threat to the US, but a threat to the rest of the planet. Democrats desperately WANT a WW III. They have been doing absolutely everything in their power to try to make it happen.
 
Biden is a liar we know. But being called one by Ukraine leadership is concerning
—-

Ukraine Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov told parliament on Friday that there is a low probability of any major escalation with Russia. He added that Ukraine intelligence sees every move made in the area.

Tensions at the Russia-Ukraine border have been ongoing, with several Western nations repeatedly predicting a huge war. Ukraine has chided those nationsfor causing a panic.

Since you support DT, lying I would think lying would be a huge plus for a Biden in your estimation. I don't understand your concern.
 
You really didn't expect Poland or Hungry to state that they were coerced into joining NATO by the US, did you? Of course they are going to claim it was their choice, but that is a lie to help them save face. When Yugoslavia refused to join NATO Clinton declared it non-existant in May 1999, before the US began its bombing campaign in Kosovo. The dismantling of Yugoslavia began with the Croatian ethnic cleansing by the Bosnians, and the Bosnian ethnic cleansing by the Serbs immediately after the fall of the Warsaw Pact.

Immediately after Clinton destroyed Yugoslavia for refusing to join NATO, Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania joined NATO within the next 5 years, seeing the outcome of those nations that defy the US. It is the US who is the threat here, not Russia. Specially the US when under the control of leftist filth, like Clinton, Obama, or Biden. You will notice that there was no "Ukraine" issues or other issues with any of the former Warsaw Pact nations when a Republican is President. Only when Democrats are President does NATO suddenly need to include all the former Warsaw Pact nations.

This is what makes the Democratic Party not just a threat to the US, but a threat to the rest of the planet. Democrats desperately WANT a WW III. They have been doing absolutely everything in their power to try to make it happen.

They tell me that there's lots of good opportunities for aspiring historical fiction authors these days. The genre is red hot.
 
With all Putin's concern about NATO, one can imagine his appreciation in Trump attacking it all the time. Its exactly what Putin wanted. That's why he tried to help him win the election.
 
Has anyone else noticed how the pro-Putin arguments are coming from the right?
 
if you want to talk Crimea then be prepared to defend Vicky Nuland.John McCain and Robert Kagan's role in Independence Square during the Euromaidan

the Rolling Stone lyric "made damn sure Pilate washed his hands and sealed his fate" come to mind- as we fomented a revolution from a protest thru a riot to a revolution.

Crimea became a forced moved (as in chess term) to secure Sevastopoll etc.

The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was a forced move, the Russian attack on Ukraine a preemptive move to annex territory, made without even the pretense of any negotiation with Ukraine.

There was ZERO indication that the Russian base leasse in Sevastopol was threatened with termination, even less than Guantanamo is threatened by Cuba.

It was a forced move only in the paranoid and expansionist minds of former communist state operatives.
 
Back
Top Bottom