- Joined
- Oct 17, 2007
- Messages
- 11,862
- Reaction score
- 10,300
- Location
- New York
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
In a welcome push for transparency and refreshing willingness to articulate policy substance, the new coalition government headed by Prime Minister Cameron laid out a detailed document that outlined its intended program.
The document can be found at: http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/409088/pfg_coalition.pdf
The document is also notable in its emphasis on strengthening individual freedom against the backdrop of a trend in the opposite direction in various parts of the world. For example, the document states that the government will:
1. Scrap the national ID card program and national identity register and halt work on the next generation biometric passport.
2. Outlaw mandatory fingerprinting of children at school.
3. Expand the scope of the Freedom of Information Act.
4. Maintain an emphasis on trial by jury.
In short, the document represents a powerful assumption that trial by jury is not irrelevant in an age when terrorism is a greater threat nor is it incompatible with meeting the challenges posed by terrorism. It also rests on the assumption that the demands of the modern world do not require a significant erosion of personal privacy.
The document can be found at: http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/409088/pfg_coalition.pdf
The document is also notable in its emphasis on strengthening individual freedom against the backdrop of a trend in the opposite direction in various parts of the world. For example, the document states that the government will:
1. Scrap the national ID card program and national identity register and halt work on the next generation biometric passport.
2. Outlaw mandatory fingerprinting of children at school.
3. Expand the scope of the Freedom of Information Act.
4. Maintain an emphasis on trial by jury.
In short, the document represents a powerful assumption that trial by jury is not irrelevant in an age when terrorism is a greater threat nor is it incompatible with meeting the challenges posed by terrorism. It also rests on the assumption that the demands of the modern world do not require a significant erosion of personal privacy.