U.S. intelligence chiefs contradict Trump on North Korea, Iran, and ISIS
The New York Times
North Korea is unlikely to give up its nuclear stockpiles
Unlikely, maybe, could be, I think, it might be, fact his they don't know, it is strictly an opinion and it sure does not make them right.
North Korea is unlikely go give up it's nuclear stockpiles. Should be go to war against NK.
and Iran is not developing nuclear weapons
How in the hell would they know, in the agreement that Obama signed there is no inspections any time any place. Nor can anyone enter a Iran military base.
an intelligence assessment says
Yeah and they said there was WMD in Iraq and they were dead wrong. That is the only reason we went to war. If their intelligence assessment was correct that there was no WMD's in Iraq there would never been a war.
challenging the president’s assertions.
And he has the right to challenge their assertions, because they damn sure not alway right.
The president has every right to ignore his intelligence chiefs, but why would he do this?
Trump gets intelligence briefings every day from all the so called intelligence chiefs.
How could he possibly know more than they do
He doesn't but how he uses the intelligence goes into the big picture. There are political issues, security issues, economic issue, do we go to war or not issues, etc etc etc. The intelligence is only looking at one item, where as the President has to take all issues into consideration.
and is he putting us all at risk by ignoring their advice?
Would going to war be putting us all at risk?