- Joined
- May 19, 2004
- Messages
- 14,315
- Reaction score
- 9,084
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Source=Yahoo News

Actually, the question at hand is privacy. In the full story it mentions watching instant messages between two private parties - all in the name of terror.
Are they going to hold EFnet or AOL accountable for the content of the chatroom?
I can smell there this is going and it stinks.
:damn
Maybe they will find folks talking about debatepolitics.com.TROY, N.Y. - [size=-1] Amid the torrent of jabber in Internet chat rooms — flirting by QTpie and BoogieBoy, arguments about politics and horror flicks — are terrorists plotting their next move?
[/size] [size=-1] The government certainly isn't discounting the possibility. It's taking the idea seriously enough to fund a yearlong study on chat room surveillance under an anti-terrorism program. [/size]
[size=-1]A Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute computer science professor hopes to develop mathematical models that can uncover structure within the scattershot traffic of online public forums. [/size]
[size=-1] Chat rooms are the highly popular and freewheeling areas on the Internet where people with self-created nicknames discuss just about anything: teachers, Kafka, cute boys, politics, love, root canal. They are also places where malicious hackers have been known to trade software tools, stolen passwords and credit card numbers. The Pew Internet & American Life Project estimates that 28 million Americans have visited Internet chat rooms.[/size]
Actually, the question at hand is privacy. In the full story it mentions watching instant messages between two private parties - all in the name of terror.
Are they going to hold EFnet or AOL accountable for the content of the chatroom?
I can smell there this is going and it stinks.
:damn