• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. Dismisses Russian Claims of Biowarfare Labs in Ukraine

It really is both hilarious and sad how right wingers have the exact same talking points parroted out by some loser talk show host that has no basis in any facts. Reminds me of 9/11 truthers and back in the day when such nuttery was confined to the CT forum here.
Actually, Tucker Carlson is THE winner talks show host.

Loser talkshow show hosts talk about Tucker, because they are potatoes, or they have to argue in court that their so-called "news" program is actually nothing but entertainment and thus can't be found liable for libel (Rachel).

Tucker covers things the 95% of the media that is effectively state-controlled don't want to discuss. And this triggers the Good Obedient Ones.
 
Yes, any bio research facility that works with any pathogen will have samples of a pathogen.

That's not the same thing as trying to make biological weapons. I'm not sure why this confuses you.
They were "concerned" that the samples had not been secured when the socialists in Russia began their invasion of Ukraine.

Nobody is "concerned" if a lab merely has samples of pathogens. Everyone has samples of anthrax and cholera and this and that. That's routine for a health research lab. One can expect Russia to already have those. And if the lab was working merely on cures, so what if the Russians suddenly has possession of a laboratory full of disease treatments? Nobody. People are only concerned if the lab has been busy weaponizing nasty little beasties and suddenly an enemy gets control of it.

Kinda like when China let the Wuhan Virus out for a walk and it wouldn't come back to the lab.
 
They were "concerned" that the samples had not been secured when the socialists in Russia began their invasion of Ukraine.

Nobody is "concerned" if a lab merely has samples of pathogens. Everyone has samples of anthrax and cholera and this and that. That's routine for a health research lab. One can expect Russia to already have those. And if the lab was working merely on cures, so what if the Russians suddenly has possession of a laboratory full of disease treatments? Nobody. People are only concerned if the lab has been busy weaponizing nasty little beasties and suddenly an enemy gets control of it.

Kinda like when China let the Wuhan Virus out for a walk and it wouldn't come back to the lab.
So, for the record, you can think of no conceivable reason that people prefer pathogens to be secured.

Five bucks says this guy is also a big believer in the "Wuhan lab leak" hypothesis.
 
Yes, any bio research facility that works with any pathogen will have samples of a pathogen.

That's not the same thing as trying to make biological weapons. I'm not sure why this confuses you.

You mean like the Wuhan lab research program that Fauci helped fund? The one that killed over 4.5million people around the world, including over 600,000 Americans and forced us all to live under lockdowns?
 
You mean like the Wuhan lab research program that Fauci helped fund? The one that killed over 4.5million people around the world, including over 600,000 Americans and forced us all to live under lockdowns?
Hey look more made up bs
 
Spoiler alert:

Wherever you live there is a biological research facility not far away

To conclude that’s a bio weapons lab is nuts
how would yo know whether it is a bio weapons lab or not?
 
how would yo know whether it is a bio weapons lab or not?

How would I? I wouldn't.

Nor would anyone else from a statement recognizing the existence of biological research facilities.

I haven't made any assertion regarding the existence or non-existence of weapons labs.
 
How would I? I wouldn't.

Nor would anyone else from a statement recognizing the existence of biological research facilities.

I haven't made any assertion regarding the existence or non-existence of weapons labs.
and that is exactly my point that more investigation is needed. you can't DISCOVER what the lab does without investigating further or forcing the issue.

the reason it is a topic is because they are apparently worried that Russia may get ahold of something we don;t want them to have.. ok, time to fess up, don;t you think? or at least explain IN DETAIL why that is. If there is nothing to is, I am sure they can explain their reasoning.. but if you give them a PASS every time they aren't going to bother to do so.
 
So, for the record, you can think of no conceivable reason that people prefer pathogens to be secured.
Problem is the record is ambiguous and no one is being forthright about the kind of research being done in these labs or why they’re experimenting with pathogens that already have established medical treatments.
 
Actually, Tucker Carlson is THE winner talks show host.
if you like massive liars who have to claim in court that you're just jobbing your audience.
 
Fox/Putin and the OP have won. Just starting the conversation about "really bad stuff in the Ukraine" is the exact same strategy as "The Big Lie". It's all about mudding the waters. None of it has to be true and none of the propogandists have to have integrity.

And "The Big Lie" is still rolling.
 
Evidence. Where is it?
Do you ever research ? Do you know how to ?

You are like someone who disputes the evidence of Australia existing because you personally have not visited and have no personal proof .


How are you getting on with those Beat The Vaxx protocols ?
 
Problem is the record is ambiguous and no one is being forthright about the kind of research being done in these labs or why they’re experimenting with pathogens that already have established medical treatments.

Would it make sense for them to take samples and detect things like anthrax?
 
Would it make sense for them to take samples and detect things like anthrax?
What they’re doing there is speculation at this point because they’re mum about what the research is. If they’re just testing samples taken from the odd outbreak then I don’t know why they need 30 labs in a State smaller than Texas to do that or why they care if Russia finds the results. It’s not a good sign if your science is a State secret.
 
Do you ever research ? Do you know how to ?

You are like someone who disputes the evidence of Australia existing because you personally have not visited and have no personal proof .


How are you getting on with those Beat The Vaxx protocols ?
Go away and take your infantile conspiracy fantasies somewhere else. Nobody here listens to you or is interested in your lies and propaganda-or haven't you noticed?
 
What they’re doing there is speculation at this point because they’re mum about what the research is. If they’re just testing samples taken from the odd outbreak then I don’t know why they need 30 labs in a State smaller than Texas to do that or why they care if Russia finds the results. It’s not a good sign if your science is a State secret.

There is no big secret... Did you happen to notice most of those labs are veterinary labs? Why do you suppose that is?
 
There is no big secret... Did you happen to notice most of those labs are veterinary labs? Why do you suppose that is?
Obviously there is since whatsherface testified they don’t want Russia getting their hands on research documents. I doubt she means dog panels. Iraq used seemingly innocuous civilian institutions as a front for its biological weapons program so what these places are on the surface doesn’t necessarily mean anything. And they’re certainly not just veterinary labs if they’re handling the dangerous pathogens described.
 
Back
Top Bottom