• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

U.S. can't prove Iran link to Iraq strife

Doremus Jessup

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 29, 2006
Messages
1,364
Reaction score
135
Location
Berlin, 1930s
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
WASHINGTON — Bush administration officials acknowledged Friday that they had yet to compile evidence strong enough to back up publicly their claims that Iran is fomenting violence against U.S. troops in Iraq.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates seemed to concede Friday that U.S. officials can't say for sure whether the Iranian government is involved in assisting the attacks on U.S. personnel in Iraq.

"I don't know that we know the answer to that question," Gates said.

Good money says that all of the talking hair-dos (pundits) will overlook this info. I guess we can just accept the lies and be marched toward another neo-con/Zionist war in the ME.

"The president has made clear, the secretary of State has made clear, I've made clear … we are not planning for a war with Iran," Gates said Friday.
Yeah right.

U.S. can't prove Iran link to Iraq strife - Los Angeles Times
 
Then how do you explain this?

Intelligence Officials Say Weapons Responsible for Increasing U.S. Deaths in Iraq

"The signature is the same because they are exactly the same in production," says explosives expert Kevin Barry. "So it's the same make and model."

U.S. officials say roadside bomb attacks against American forces in Iraq have become much more deadly as more and more of the Iran-designed and Iran-produced bombs have been smuggled in from the country since last October.

"I think the evidence is strong that the Iranian government is making these IEDs, and the Iranian government is sending them across the border and they are killing U.S. troops once they get there," says Richard Clarke, former White House counterterrorism chief and an ABC News consultant. "I think it's very hard to escape the conclusion that, in all probability, the Iranian government is knowingly killing U.S. troops."

ABC News: EXCLUSIVE: Iraq Weapons -- Made in Iran?

And this?

Iranian Weapons Arm Iraqi Militias

WASHINGTON, Nov. 30, 2006 — U.S. officials say they have found smoking-gun evidence of Iranian support for terrorists in Iraq: brand-new weapons fresh from Iranian factories. According to a senior defense official, coalition forces have recently seized Iranian-made weapons and munitions that bear manufacturing dates in 2006.

This suggests, say the sources, that the material is going directly from Iranian factories to Shia militias, rather than taking a roundabout path through the black market. "There is no way this could be done without (Iranian) government approval," says a senior official.

Iranian-made munitions found in Iraq include advanced IEDs designed to pierce armor and anti-tank weapons. U.S. intelligence believes the weapons have been supplied to Iraq's growing Shia militias from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, which is also believed to be training Iraqi militia fighters in Iran.

ABC News: EXCLUSIVE: Iranian Weapons Arm Iraqi Militia

:confused:
 
Why should we be concerned with having to prove it when Iran freely admits to supplying Iraq insurgents with support?
 
Then how do you explain this?

And this?

:confused:

The same way that we explain how reports from intellegence officials reported that we now know Iraq had WMDs, hundreds of tons of chemical weapons, and ties to Al-Queda.

I heard reports that the recent NIE report disputed the administration's claims about the degree of Iranian involvement in Iraq, though I haven't read the report myself yet.
 
Then how do you explain this?

Intelligence Officials Say Weapons Responsible for Increasing U.S. Deaths in Iraq

"The signature is the same because they are exactly the same in production," says explosives expert Kevin Barry. "So it's the same make and model."

Great, its the same make and model. Want to say where it was made in that case then? A huge order from China or Russia (maybe even from America) during the Saddam years? Or doesn't he know which provides exactly zero evidence.

U.S. officials say roadside bomb attacks against American forces in Iraq have become much more deadly as more and more of the Iran-designed and Iran-produced bombs have been smuggled in from the country since last October.

This story has already been run before. I have zero military expertise but supposedly the increased destruction has been due to insurgents becoming knowledgeable about how to 'shape' the charge so that it can penetrate thick armour. They are still using the same type of decades old artilllary shells as before.

"I think the evidence is strong that the Iranian government is making these IEDs, and the Iranian government is sending them across the border and they are killing U.S. troops once they get there," says Richard Clarke, former White House counterterrorism chief and an ABC News consultant. "I think it's very hard to escape the conclusion that, in all probability, the Iranian government is knowingly killing U.S. troops."

ABC News: EXCLUSIVE: Iraq Weapons -- Made in Iran?


The evidence is strong..what evidence. Rumurs and allegations are proof of nothing. 'Its very hard to escape the conclusion that in all probability' just about sums it up. He's in effect just admitted that they have no evidence to back up the claims, only suspicions.

And this?

Quote:
Iranian Weapons Arm Iraqi Militias

WASHINGTON, Nov. 30, 2006 — U.S. officials say they have found smoking-gun evidence of Iranian support for terrorists in Iraq: brand-new weapons fresh from Iranian factories. According to a senior defense official, coalition forces have recently seized Iranian-made weapons and munitions that bear manufacturing dates in 2006.

I'd be interested to know who they seized these things from, if true. But if so it could be evidence, just depends who sold the stuff, who it was given to, who was using it etc.

This suggests, say the sources, that the material is going directly from Iranian factories to Shia militias, rather than taking a roundabout path through the black market. "There is no way this could be done without (Iranian) government approval," says a senior official.

Iran can completely seal its border with Iraq but the Iraqi govt with thousands of American troops can't seal its own side, very doubtfull. There are lots of possibilities about how/if this happened but the official disregards these in order to promote his pre-determined conclusion.

Iranian-made munitions found in Iraq include advanced IEDs designed to pierce armor and anti-tank weapons. U.S. intelligence believes the weapons have been supplied to Iraq's growing Shia militias from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, which is also believed to be training Iraqi militia fighters in Iran.

ABC News: EXCLUSIVE: Iranian Weapons Arm Iraqi Militia

If they know this for a fact why use the phrase 'believe'?
Of course its a possibilty this may be occuring but this is the same sort of 'proof' that we had in relation to WMD in Iraq. All maybes, buts, ifs, beliefs, possibles etc etc.

Fact is we have proof of nothing...why not just say we suspect Iran may be helping arm Shia groups in Iraq instead of lieing and saying we have proof it is doing so?
Looks like someone is definately trying to push the agenda forward here.
 
Great, its the same make and model. Want to say where it was made in that case then? A huge order from China or Russia (maybe even from America) during the Saddam years? Or doesn't he know which provides exactly zero evidence.



This story has already been run before. I have zero military expertise but supposedly the increased destruction has been due to insurgents becoming knowledgeable about how to 'shape' the charge so that it can penetrate thick armour. They are still using the same type of decades old artilllary shells as before.




The evidence is strong..what evidence. Rumurs and allegations are proof of nothing. 'Its very hard to escape the conclusion that in all probability' just about sums it up. He's in effect just admitted that they have no evidence to back up the claims, only suspicions.



I'd be interested to know who they seized these things from, if true. But if so it could be evidence, just depends who sold the stuff, who it was given to, who was using it etc.



Iran can completely seal its border with Iraq but the Iraqi govt with thousands of American troops can't seal its own side, very doubtfull. There are lots of possibilities about how/if this happened but the official disregards these in order to promote his pre-determined conclusion.



If they know this for a fact why use the phrase 'believe'?
Of course its a possibilty this may be occuring but this is the same sort of 'proof' that we had in relation to WMD in Iraq. All maybes, buts, ifs, beliefs, possibles etc etc.

Fact is we have proof of nothing...why not just say we suspect Iran may be helping arm Shia groups in Iraq instead of lieing and saying we have proof it is doing so?
Looks like someone is definately trying to push the agenda forward here.

Blah blah blah:

WASHINGTON, Nov. 30, 2006 — U.S. officials say they have found smoking-gun evidence of Iranian support for terrorists in Iraq: brand-new weapons fresh from Iranian factories. According to a senior defense official, coalition forces have recently seized Iranian-made weapons and munitions that bear manufacturing dates in 2006.

Case ****ing closed!

They're Iranian in origin that's a fact and your twisting and wriggling isn't going to get you anywhere.
 
Oh so they were supplying IED's last year but out of the kindness of their hearts have decided to stop? Is that your assertion?

No. This is my assertion.
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates seemed to concede Friday that U.S. officials can't say for sure whether the Iranian government is involved in assisting the attacks on U.S. personnel in Iraq.

"I don't know that we know the answer to that question," Gates said.
 
Good money says that all of the talking hair-dos (pundits) will overlook this info. I guess we can just accept the lies and be marched toward another neo-con/Zionist war in the ME.


Yeah right.

U.S. can't prove Iran link to Iraq strife - Los Angeles Times

if you knew anything about politics, instead of partisanship, you would realize these are the kind of statements that are used to facilitate a diplomatic remedy to teh current situation
despite the rabid lefts beleif, i do not believe bush is looking for a war whereever he can make one
 
Blah blah blah:

WASHINGTON, Nov. 30, 2006 — U.S. officials say they have found smoking-gun evidence of Iranian support for terrorists in Iraq: brand-new weapons fresh from Iranian factories. According to a senior defense official, coalition forces have recently seized Iranian-made weapons and munitions that bear manufacturing dates in 2006.

Case ****ing closed!

They're Iranian in origin that's a fact and your twisting and wriggling isn't going to get you anywhere.

I guess if they turn up with a brand new Russian or Chinese made AK47 the case is closed that they are also arming our enemies...:confused:

I heard previously a shipment of Italian berettas wound up in the hands of the insurgents...has Italy now declared war on the US.

You may be desperate for another war but try sticking to the facts to justify it.

And I ain't twisting and wriggling...if they ARE supplying and training people who target US forces then I think we have every right to strike back. I don't think we should be attacking anyone just cause somebody THINKS they might be doing something. Provide some proof.

Anyways, bearing in mind that the Iranian govt. is extremely happy with who currently occupies power in Iraq I fail to see why it would support Sunni terrorists trying to overthrow it?

Unless your argument is that the Iraqi govt is attacking US forces and the Iranians are helping them...maybe we should just declare War on Iraq...again......
 
I guess if they turn up with a brand new Russian or Chinese made AK47 the case is closed that they are also arming our enemies...:confused:

You can't get IED's off the shelf they're not for sale on the open market, there would be know way in the world that the Iranian government wouldn't know about it and who they were going to.
 
You can't get IED's off the shelf they're not for sale on the open market, there would be know way in the world that the Iranian government wouldn't know about it and who they were going to.

I know..as there name suggests you can't buy them or supply them - they're improvised devices - usually decades old artillary shells looted from huge arm depots in the aftermath of the war - the Iranian govt ain't got any control over them.

As the Sec of Def has said already..there is no PROOF that the Iranians are doing any of this..its definatly a possibility but not been proved.
 
The evil, LIBERAL, Los Angeles Times forced Gates to admit the lack of proof (perhaps with torture). Some others have claimed that Gates really an evil LIBERAL in disguise, falsely admitting a lack of proof.

I am not sure which one I agree with, myself, but I am sure one of the scenarios above is true. Because I want it to be so.
 
I know..as there name suggests you can't buy them or supply them - they're improvised devices - usually decades old artillary shells looted from huge arm depots in the aftermath of the war - the Iranian govt ain't got any control over them.

Bullshit these are advanced IED's which the Iranian government specializes in making, they have factories which produce them.

As the Sec of Def has said already..there is no PROOF that the Iranians are doing any of this..its definatly a possibility but not been proved.

I believe what he meant is that there is no evidence that Iranian operatives are directly engaged in attacking U.S. soldiers.
 
Bullshit these are advanced IED's which the Iranian government specializes in making, they have factories which produce them.

In that case they would be roadside bombs or maybe even mines, not IEDS's. IED's are devices/explosives which are normally meant for one purpose and then improvised to be used for another i.e converted artillary shells.

I believe what he meant is that there is no evidence that Iranian operatives are directly engaged in attacking U.S. soldiers.

He was asked if they were 'assisting' and he said they couldn't say for sure. Case closed at the moment, if he ain't got any proof about this then there is none.
 
In that case they would be roadside bombs or maybe even mines, not IEDS's. IED's are devices/explosives which are normally meant for one purpose and then improvised to be used for another i.e converted artillary shells.

These advanced IED's were produced in Iranian munition factories:

WASHINGTON, Nov. 30, 2006 — U.S. officials say they have found smoking-gun evidence of Iranian support for terrorists in Iraq: brand-new weapons fresh from Iranian factories. According to a senior defense official, coalition forces have recently seized Iranian-made weapons and munitions that bear manufacturing dates in 2006.

He was asked if they were 'assisting' and he said they couldn't say for sure. Case closed at the moment, if he ain't got any proof about this then there is none.

Again Iranian produced IED's is proof enough.
 
These advanced IED's were produced in Iranian munition factories:





Again Iranian produced IED's is proof enough.

Doesn't actually say what they have found or what they allege was produced by Iran. And IED's are not manufactured so I would guess he's talking about other types of arms..:roll:

The Sec of Defense has been very clear here, there's no proof to substantiate the accusations...case closed.
 
G-Man said:
In that case they would be roadside bombs or maybe even mines, not IEDS's. IED's are devices/explosives which are normally meant for one purpose and then improvised to be used for another i.e converted artillary shells.

Not necessarily. You seem to be confusing shaped charges that are manufactured as whole bombs versus those being assembled from components manufactured in Iran and Syria. Weld up some steel plates and disc-shaped bits in a form that can be incorporated or attached to a scrounged-up or stolen artillery shell and voila, you get an "explosively formed penetrator" type of shaped charge.

These EFPs are now being incorporated into artillery shell-based IEDs with some success. The technology of these explosive devices, which has since proliferated in other parts of Iraq, is similar to that used by the Lebanese Hezbollah group which has strong ties with Iran and Syria. Some basic info on EFPs from Wikipedia:


While EFPs have served mainly as warheads in military weapons, the war in Iraq has seen a shift in use with their incorporation into IEDs.

EFP IEDs are currently being deployed in Iraq by insurgents [1] to attack Western forces, in particular the many PSD (Personal Security Detail) teams as they operate in light- to medium-armoured vehicles.

Often mounted on crash barriers at window level, they are placed at roadsides where vehicles must slow down at choke points such as intersections and junctions. This gives the operator time to judge the moment to strike, when the vehicle is moving more slowly. The intent is often to penetrate the vehicle crew compartment.

The charges are generally cylindrical, fabricated from commonly available water or oil pipe with the forward end closed by a concave metal disk known as the liner, of copper or steel to create a shaped charge. Explosive is loaded behind the metal liner to fill the pipe. Upon detonation, the explosive projects the liner to form a rod-like projectile at a velocity well over 1 km/s, depending on the design and type of explosive used.

Essentially, the projectile is a potent short-range kinetic-energy penetrator that can easily punch through the protection of light- to medium-armoured vehicles, delivering a wide spray of semi-molten metal and vehicle armour backspall, intended to penetrate the vehicle's exterior, injuring its crew and damaging other systems.

Detonation is controlled by cable, radio control (RC) or remote arming with passive IR (PIR) trigger.

The makers of bombs, even IEDs and EFP/IEDs are usually identifiable thru the characteristics of the devices that they assemble. Once they learn to make these things a certain way, they may evolve, but the basic "blueprint" remains pretty much the same and becomes very much like their fingerprint - each individual bombmaker has his own signature or identifying characteristics.

Welds (due to every welder's technique being at least slightly unique) and steel (due to its distinctive chemical composition that can and usually does vary even if only slightly from plant to plant) are eminently traceable.
 
Back
Top Bottom