• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.N. Opens New Investigation Into Crash That Killed Dag Hammarskjold

JANFU

Land by the Gulf Stream
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
59,458
Reaction score
39,048
Location
Best Coast Canada
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/17/w...h-that-killed-dag-hammarskjold.html?ref=world

 
What possible motive did the US have for this? 2 people loosely affiliated to US intel coming out with their stories 50 years after the incident with absolutely 0 corroborating evidence proves nothing.

Interview on ground witnesses after 54 years??!?!!
 
What possible motive did the US have for this? 2 people loosely affiliated to US intel coming out with their stories 50 years after the incident with absolutely 0 corroborating evidence proves nothing.
2 US Intelligence officers, "loosely affiliated" now that is a stretch.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/17/w...h-that-killed-dag-hammarskjold.html?ref=world

 
2 US Intelligence officers, "loosely affiliated" now that is a stretch.

Read your own article:

Charles Southall, now 80, was a naval aviator in 1961, working at a signals intelligence base in Cyprus.

Pilot, not CIA, not NSA, not even Naval intel.

Paul Henry Abram, now 73, was a Russian-speaking Air Force expert on loan to the National Security Agency

Contractor, not NSA.

But hey better 50 years late than never eh? :roll:

I bet if you put your mind to it you can find far more than 2 people loosely affiliated with US intelligence 50 years after the fact who will claim they witnessed little green men too.
 

And oddly enough even 50 years later the truth can somehow surface.
Did I state that it was shot down, no, but information does have a way of surfacing.

We have seen that time and again.
But back in those day as it is today, it was about wealth and resources.
 

Given a long enough time scale you can find 2 people loosely affiliated with US intelligence (sample population in the millions) who will claim just about anything. You haven't provided evidence, you haven't even provided compelling testimony.
 
Because there is nothing more worthwhile going on in the world for them to spend their time and money on.

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…