So the first punch can't be the rhetorical one that starts a riot or mass murder?
There are limits to every amendment, including the first .
He's a coward, noting that the doesn't actually have the authority to do that.
Noting as well that suddenly our liberal friends favor discrimination
Speech that incites a riot is not protected.
I don't support Nazis in Jewish neighborhoods either .
The rioter is the one who is not protected, excep n Baltimore of course
Against GellerWhat "discrimination"?
Baltimore was an exception to the ruleWhat does Baltimore have to do with Garland, Texas?
Since you bring up Baltimore, how did that start--its genesis ?
So YER telling me I favor discrimination right?
Why are you calling liberals cowards?
Why is everything with you--liberals wrong?
Were any liberals making those drawings?
Why do Jewish-Americans vote 75% for liberals--and at a very high percentage of their voter bloc?
This is a Mayor of a town in the RED state of Texas--not a BLUE state of California .
So tell us ... what kind of speech shouldn't be protected. Give very specific examples.
So tell us ... what kind of speech shouldn't be protected.
Give very specific examples.
Against Geller
Are you aware of any kind of speech that the SCOTUS does not protect?
Or are you saying that the SCOTUS has always upheld every kind of speech, such as hate speech ?
So YER telling me I favor discrimination right?
Why are you calling liberals cowards?
Why is everything with you--liberals wrong?
Were any liberals making those drawings?
Why do Jewish-Americans vote 75% for liberals--and at a very high percentage of their voter bloc?
This is a Mayor of a town in the RED state of Texas--not a BLUE state of California .
Conservative speech of course
We're talking about what YOU say shouldn't be protected. Tell us.
What are they saying?
So now criticism is discrimination?
Got obtuse--you know how to use the Google better than I--I'm sure YER up on their "blame" cards already .
I follow the law--how about YOU ?
Speech that incites a riot is not protected.
I don't support Nazis in Jewish neighborhoods either .
I honestly hope you're not suggesting that people who make fun of religions should be held legally responsible for violent acts against them.
You're not really saying that, are you?
That is YER opinion.No one in Garland engaged in any speech that came anywhere near meeting this description.
Is making fun of religion considered inciting a riot per the law?
That is YER opinion.
Geller is a conservative trying to divide America--something the party of Nixon can't let go of--my opinion .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?