There were 2 things that really stood out to me in today's audit report that are tough to write off as merely being "coincidental", and seem to indicate that there was some internal hanky-panky going on with the mail-in ballots in last November's election.
First there was this:
View attachment 67355417
Compared to the 2016 election, there was a 53% increase in the number of mail-in ballots in last November's election. Logic dictates you would see a similar increase, or at least some increase, in the number of signature mismatch rejections, but that isn't what happened. Instead the number of signature mismatch rejections went from 1,456 in 2016, to only 587 in 2020.... That's a whopping 61% decrease.
The other thing that caught my attention was this:
View attachment 67355416
In the 4 weeks leading up to election day, only 5% of the signatures from mail-in ballot were seen as illegible when examined, which sounds perfectly reasonable... What sends up the red flag for me is the fact that of the ballot signatures looked at from the 4 days after the election, an unbelievable 95% of them were deemed illegible. It went from 1 out of 20 being illegible before election day, to 19 out of 20 after election day.
I'm sorry, but I just can't square that, and I can't see anyone else being able to square it either.
.