Tweet might be damning new evidence Rep. Omar married her brother

[zimmer]

Conservative sleuths believe they’ve uncovered indisputable evidence proving that anti-SemiticMuslim Rep. Ilhan Omar did indeed marry her own brother for the purposes of committing immigration fraud.


The proof is a tweet she posted on Jun 16, 2013. Though the actual tweet has since been deleted, a Google search showed that it was still archived by the search engine as of Tuesday morning:

Tweet might be damning new evidence Rep. Omar married her brother

Whoops!!!

The Goebbels Media has given her pass after pass... as she fails to answer simple questions about her marriage.
###

Or as another site stated in their headline:
[h=2]HUGE DEVELOPMENT: New Evidence Emerges That Rep. Ilhan Omar Married Her Brother and is Using a Fake Name[/h]HUGE DEVELOPMENT: New Evidence Emerges That Rep. Ilhan Omar Married Her Brother and is Using a Fake Name

 

[zimmer]

I wonder... will the Goebbels Media be chasing her down? Naaaah... they protect their own.

 

[improvius]

...because nobody would ever wish Happy Father's Day to their father-in-law? Lol.

 

[roughdraft274]

So she said happy fathers day to her father in law, so she's married to her brother?

I call my in-laws mom and dad all the time. Seriously, this is trash. Only Trump supporters would believe such obvious bull**** conspiracy theories.

 

[Lovebug]

I called my best friend's mom mom all the time.

 

[tres borrachos]

Glad to see The Gateway Pundit taking time out of their busy schedule of claiming the Parkland students were crisis actors, the Cleveland Cavaliers victory parade pictures were from outside a Trump rally in Portland Maine, and the major, critical, so important scoop about how AOC was once called "Sandy". They have an audience of dimwits to appeal to. A dumb audience who thinks it's odd for a woman to wish Happy Father's Day to her father in law.

Comedy gold.

 

[ElChupacabra]

 

[bearpoker]

Glad to see The Gateway Pundit taking time out of their busy schedule of claiming the Parkland students were crisis actors, the Cleveland Cavaliers victory parade pictures were from outside a Trump rally in Portland Maine, and the major, critical, so important scoop about how AOC was once called "Sandy". They have an audience of dimwits to appeal to. A dumb audience who thinks it's odd for a woman to wish Happy Father's Day to her father in law.

Comedy gold.

The ever vigilant right never misses an opportunity to make themselves look ridiculous.

 

[SCrider]

The ever vigilant right never misses an opportunity to make themselves look ridiculous.

The problem is no matter how ridiculous these things never go away completely, because the RW is full of ****ing idiots who believe this ****.

 

[Lovebug]

The ever vigilant right never misses an opportunity to make themselves look ridiculous.

Lets not kid ourselves, it is not just the right looking ridiculous and gullible.

 

[KevinKohler]

Failed thread is failed.

 

[Lovebug]

Failed thread is failed.

C'mon, gossip is fun. Look at the front page.

 

[zimmer]

...because nobody would ever wish Happy Father's Day to their father-in-law? Lol.

If it is her father in law... why did she delete the Tweet, and why does she fail to clarify that marriage?

 

[COTO]

Some basic facts would be nice.

Can "aabo" refer to a father-in-law?

Who does she claim her father is, and is there not considerable evidence proving her claim true? Videos, photos, birth certificates, etc.?

For somebody who knows next to nothing about the controversy: what is the sum of what we have to believe for the conspiracy to be true, and how much evidence is there to support it? (Please, no opinions on whether or not the conspiracy is valid. I well and truly don't care what you think and would prefer to make my own assessment. An objective outline of the conspiracy and facts in evidence, however, would be much appreciated.)

 

[bearpoker]

The problem is no matter how ridiculous these things never go away completely, because the RW is full of ****ing idiots who believe this ****.

True, just like Pizzagate will never go away. The same people who believe Pizzagate will believe this. They are what they are, our very own American Nutjobs. We can't get rid of them, but we can laugh at them and keep them penned up where they can't hurt themselves or others.

 

[bearpoker]

Some basic facts would be nice.

Can "aabo" refer to a father-in-law?

Who does she claim her father is, and is there not considerable evidence proving her claim true? Videos, photos, birth certificates, etc.?

For somebody who knows next to nothing about the controversy: what is the sum of what we have to believe for the conspiracy to be true, and how much evidence is there to support it? (Please, no opinions on whether or not the conspiracy is valid. I well and truly don't care what you think and would prefer to make my own assessment. An objective outline of the conspiracy and facts in evidence, however, would be much appreciated.)

Oh come now. We're talking about birther, Pizzagate types. No matter how much evidence is produced, they will only believe what supports their preconceived conclusions.

 

[zimmer]

True, just like Pizzagate will never go away. The same people who believe Pizzagate will believe this. They are what they are, our very own American Nutjobs. We can't get rid of them, but we can laugh at them and keep them penned up where they can't hurt themselves or others.

This is not Pizzagate, and except for your fetish with it, had heard almost zero about it.

About penning up people... Democrats have a history of that as slave owners and penning up Japanese Americans during FDR’s reign.

What’s her name?

 

[beefheart]

Whoops!!!

The Goebbels Media has given her pass after pass... as she fails to answer simple questions about her marriage.
###

Or as another site stated in their headline:
[h=2]HUGE DEVELOPMENT: New Evidence Emerges That Rep. Ilhan Omar Married Her Brother and is Using a Fake Name[/h]HUGE DEVELOPMENT: New Evidence Emerges That Rep. Ilhan Omar Married Her Brother and is Using a Fake Name

Gateway Pundit.

Seriously?

Have you not learned anything from all the pure garbage and lies they spew?

 

[year2late]

Whoops!!!

The Goebbels Media has given her pass after pass... as she fails to answer simple questions about her marriage.
###

Or as another site stated in their headline:
[h=2]HUGE DEVELOPMENT: New Evidence Emerges That Rep. Ilhan Omar Married Her Brother and is Using a Fake Name[/h]HUGE DEVELOPMENT: New Evidence Emerges That Rep. Ilhan Omar Married Her Brother and is Using a Fake Name

Don't you have fetal beating hearts sold by StemXpress from Planned Parenthood to track down before you go down another rabbit hole?

 

[chuckiechan]

Some basic facts would be nice.

Can "aabo" refer to a father-in-law?

Who does she claim her father is, and is there not considerable evidence proving her claim true? Videos, photos, birth certificates, etc.?

For somebody who knows next to nothing about the controversy: what is the sum of what we have to believe for the conspiracy to be true, and how much evidence is there to support it? (Please, no opinions on whether or not the conspiracy is valid. I well and truly don't care what you think and would prefer to make my own assessment. An objective outline of the conspiracy and facts in evidence, however, would be much appreciated.)

Marriage connections are very “iffy” by western standards in the Muslim community and immigrant communities in general. For all we really know is she made marriage “adjustments” for social benefits. Polygamy is not illegal in her culture, so who are we to judge her motives? Hell, in California you will soon be able to marry your goldfish.

 

[trixare4kids]

Gateway Pundit.

Seriously?

Have you not learned anything from all the pure garbage and lies they spew?

Sort of like The NY Times?

 

[zimmer]

Oh come now. We're talking about birther, Pizzagate types. No matter how much evidence is produced, they will only believe what supports their preconceived conclusions.

Says the party who has consumed Russian Collusion for 2-years... and have been force fed a lie every 11.5 days from their Goebbels Media.
86 Media Mistakes in the Trump Era: The Definitive List | Sharyl Attkisson

Why is Omar so shy about her previous marriage?

 

[bearpoker]

This is not Pizzagate, and except for your fetish with it, had heard almost zero about it.

About penning up people... Democrats have a history of that as slave owners and penning up Japanese Americans during FDR’s reign.

What’s her name?

Deplorable as the Japanese internment was, at least it didn't take children from their parents and intern them without soap and toothbrushes. Interesting that you have to bring up stuff from 80 to 150 years ago. You've made yourself look foolish...again, so now you're trying to change the subject.

 

[bearpoker]

Says the party who has consumed Russian Collusion for 2-years... and have been force fed a lie every 11.5 days from their Goebbels Media.
86 Media Mistakes in the Trump Era: The Definitive List | Sharyl Attkisson

Why is Omar so shy about her previous marriage?

The Mueller report documented Russian interference in the elections. That's a fact. Mueller didn't address collusion at all. It was Trump who went on and on about it. None of this is relevant to the OP, which you can't stick to, since it's been shot down already.

 

[COTO]

Oh come now. We're talking about birther, Pizzagate types. No matter how much evidence is produced, they will only believe what supports their preconceived conclusions.

See, this is what ticks me off.

What part of "I well and truly don't care what you think and would prefer to make my own assessment." do you not understand? You think I put the disclaimer in there for kicks?

I don't know you from Adam and I don't give a snow leopard's fuzzy white arse that you think the theory is asinine. I care about why you think it's asinine. I want you--and anyone else who replies to my post--to shove your opinions for two blessed minutes to write an objective two paragraphs about the alleged scope of the conspiracy, what specific evidence the proponents cite (an itemized list is fine), and what specific evidence the detractors cite. Something that I and the dozens of readers out there like me can digest in a minute or two without having to crawl through hell and gone over the Internet trying to piece everything together.

If you can't or won't provide this, it would be a tremendous favour to me and everyone else if you didn't ignore disclaimers to assume an editorial statement is a valid substitute.

My apologies for being so abrupt but I assure you I'm not the only one sick to death of one-off "This is BS." or ad hom replies to specific queries. Thank you for your consideration.