• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Turns out all of humanity is related to a single couple

Grokmaster

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
9,613
Reaction score
2,735
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Hmm....where have I read that before.... :mrgreen:


Getting popcorn for impending deluge of Darwinist/atheist hysteria...who will now perform tremendous acrobatics and dance moves to try to pretend this fits the narrative they have been spewing for about 100 years.

If Darwinism is correct...GROUPS of humans in the same area would have evolved at or near the same time...and GENETIC SCIENTISTS JUST DEBUnKED THAT, USING DNA form over 5,000,000 humans..WORLDWIDE.



Turns out all of humanity is related to a single couple


It really is all relative.

A new study revealed that all humans are descendants of the same man and woman who lived 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.

Our communal mom and dad got together after a “catastrophic event” almost wiped out the human race, the Daily Mail reported of the study.
The researchers studied the DNA of five million animals, including humans, to come to their conclusions. .

.






https://nypost.com/2018/11/24/turns-out-all-of-humanity-is-related-to-a-single-couple/
 
Last edited:
The massive in-breeding would go a long way to explaining many things..........:cool:
 
The 'mitochondrial DNA' examined in the research is that which mothers pass down from generation to generation and it showed the 'absence of human exceptionalism.'

'One might have thought that, due to their high population numbers and wide geographic distribution, humans might have led to greater genetic diversity than other animal species,' added Stoeckle.

'At least for mitochondrial DNA, humans turn out to be low to average in genetic diversity.'

The study has been misunderstood by some religious parties who thought it meant that we all came into being in some seminal Big Bang-typed event 100,000 ago, but this isn't what the findings actually suggest.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...iving-200-000-years-ago-scientists-claim.html

Or you could read a bit further.
 
Is Ancestary.com aware of this?Could mess up a few family trees.
 
He might learn something then, he's a Trump fan, part of the proudly poorly educated. He basks in TRump's love, so he's NEVER want that! As you can tell from his none too bright postings!

It must be extremely frustrating to be in the position of really really wanting something to be true and all the evidence you fire out to support it just flings its' self back in your face in a few minutes.
 


AS PREDICTED: Anything to pretend this doesn't BLOW THE LID off of Darwinist theory.


I focused on the SCIENTIFIC FACTS, not the OPINION you cited.

Meanwhile:


"Stoeckle and Thaler, the scientists who headed the study, concluded that ninety percent of all animal species alive today come from parents that all began giving birth at roughly the same time, less than 250 thousand years ago - throwing into doubt the patterns of human evolution.
'This conclusion is very surprising,' Thaler admitted, 'and I fought against it as hard as I could.'

The new report from experts at the Rockefeller University along with from the University of Basel published the extraordinary findings in Human Evolution."
 
The massive in-breeding would go a long way to explaining many things..........:cool:

Exactly, like why so many people scoff at the idea that humans descended from monkey's uncles.
 
Especially concerning the OPs questionable posting careeer huh?

And there's the first DP Left "Dodge the Topic" ad hom….that didn't take long, did it?

Here ..COMMENT ON MY USING CAPS, for your nest dodge.
 
Doesn't the timeline of 100,000 to 200,000 years blow up the bible narrative anyway?
 
Doesn't the timeline of 100,000 to 200,000 years blow up the bible narrative anyway?

Never read the Bible, we see.


There is NO REFERENCE to the age of the Earth within it, sorry. The OPINIONS of some people regarding that are OPINIONS.


And, since you bring it up, CARBON DATNG has been proven to be WILDLY INACCCURATE...so we really have NO CLEAR IDEA of the actual age of the planet, or even less so, the universe...just SPECULATION.

As opposed to GENETICALLY VERIFIED evidence of the Origin of Man as in the OP. The FACTS are the FACTS...feel free to draw your own explanation.


Care to dodge the tropic some more?


See the ANTI-SCIENCE CROWD, at it, again? :)
 
He might learn something then, he's a Trump fan, part of the proudly poorly educated. He basks in TRump's love, so he's NEVER want that! As you can tell from his none too bright postings!

There are Trump fans that could eat your lunch in any academic topic you choose.
I HATE arrogance like what you just said.
It is pure bigotry and prejudice directed at a very large mixed group of people from all races, genders and education levels.

...and you still are wondering why America rejected your candidate and your philosophy.

It is because you only have hate and arrogance to offer.
 
Last edited:
Never read the Bible, we see.


There is NO REFERENCE to the age of the Earth within it, sorry. The OPINIONS of some people regarding that are OPINIONS.


And, since you bring it up, CARBON DATNG has been proven to be WILDLY INACCCURATE...so we really have NO CLEAR IDEA of the actual age of the planet, or even less so, the universe...just SPECULATION.

As opposed to GENETICALLY VERIFIED evidence of the Origin of Man as in the OP. The FACTS are the FACTS...feel free to draw your own explanation.


Care to dodge the tropic some more?


See the ANTI-SCIENCE CROWD, at it, again? :)


No, the bible folks teach that the Earth is 6,000 years old. So, your own OP isn't consistent with the bible narrative since they remark that the couple lived between 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.

You could simply say the infallible bible is fallible, or just deny some more. Up to you.
 
He might learn something then, he's a Trump fan, part of the proudly poorly educated. He basks in TRump's love, so he's NEVER want that! As you can tell from his none too bright postings!

Oh look!! Already the SECOND AD HOM from the same source, TERRIFIED to even ADDRESS, much less attempt to engage, on the FACTS OF THE OP.

Apparently ANTI-SCIENCE.



SDPLB= Standard DP Left BULL****.
 
Oh look!! Already the SECOND AD HOM from the same source, TERRIFIED to even ADDRESS, much less attempt to engage, on the FACTS OF THE OP.

Apparently ANTI-SCIENCE.



SDPLB= Standard DP Left BULL****.

I didn't even read it, why should I? I mean you poseted it, so it's guaranteed to be stupid or supposedly makes some point no logical mind would conclude. Perhaps I'll get bored later if the games suck....
 
No, the bible folks teach that the Earth is 6,000 years old. So, your own OP isn't consistent with the bible narrative since they remark that the couple lived between 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.

You could simply say the infallible bible is fallible, or just deny some more. Up to you.

The "bible folk" do not teach that.
Some priest thought that up a long time ago, and he was wrong.
Just because Mathew Harrison Brady said it in the movie, Inherit The Wind, does not mean "bible folk" believe it to be true.
This is bigotry to say so and to lump all "bible folk" together as having one mind and one thought.

If you hate being called a libertard and other vile names, and being lump together with all other liberals, then quit doing it yourself with "bible folk".

Both are equally wrong things to say and are bigoted things to say.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't the timeline of 100,000 to 200,000 years blow up the bible narrative anyway?

Maybe to a few catholics, or anyone who reads strictly english version of the old testament. Otherwise, no.
 
The "bible folk" do not teach that.
Some priest thought that up a long time ago, and he was wrong.
Just because Mathew Harrison Brady said it in the movie, Inherit The Wind, does not mean "bible folk" believe it to be true.
This is bigotry to say so and to lump all "bible folk" together as having one mind and one thought.

You people have thought? Nobody can tell from the postings....
 
Back
Top Bottom