Tucker Gets Dunked On

[Callen]

So these people who are crawling out of the woodwork, claiming that he's for some reason supporting Russia. Are only doing so to suit their own narrative.

Somebody help me understand how people can listen to his actual words and then say it isn't what he said? We saw it over and over again with Trump. It astounds me how so many are so easily manipulated.

 

[Lycanthrope]

Somebody help me understand how people can listen to his actual words and then say it isn't what he said? We saw it over and over again with Trump. It astounds me how so many are so easily manipulated.

"For the record, I'm totally opposed to these sanctions."
"I think we should probably take the side of Russia if we have to choose between Russia and Ukraine"
"Why shouldn't I root for Russia? Because I am!"

Mother Tuckers: "LOL lib media says whatever it wants/he never said root for Russia/I can't see that it's behind a paywall LALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU TUCKER RULES"

 

[Callen]

"For the record, I'm totally opposed to these sanctions."
"I think we should probably take the side of Russia if we have to choose between Russia and Ukraine"
"Why shouldn't I root for Russia? Because I am!"

Mother Tuckers: "LOL lib media says whatever it wants/he never said root for Russia/I can't see that it's behind a paywall LALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU TUCKER RULES"

Well there is an ambiguous statement that can be taken many ways ! Trust the libs to twist it..../sarc

 

[grip]

The man is on camera saying he opposes sanctions and also saying we should take the side of Russia.

He has to own his words. He's walking them back now.

He walks back a lot of stupid statements but at least that shows some sense. Personally, I don't like his demeanor, it's obnoxious. But nobody is wrong about everything.

 

[grip]

Well, as a global statement, what you say is true, but its also misleading. There are political commentary shows on Fox, MSNBC and CNN that do a much better job with a commitment to facts than Tucker. That all said, I for one, will assert anything that would be in the public domain that I can not validate with a cite from the green box at the top of this chart.

View attachment 67377695

I agree with your sourcing though the more reputable outlets don't cover every story. The bias is so bad with Networks and cable that the op/eds and hosts & pundits' opinions are distorting the facts so much as to change the truth. It's getting harder to untwist and discern what the reality is.

 

[grip]

He is using sensible language now in order to divert attention from the contradictory things he said in the past.

If he would come out and say he was flat wrong in what he said in the past and that he has changed his opinions now that he has more information, I would have more respect for him. The fact is: He says controversial things simply because that is what he gets paid for. Full stop. If the wind starts blowing the other way and there is a risk to his paycheck, he will change his opinions and his beliefs to the degree necessary to continue to make money. He is like his other Fox News talking head coworkers in this respect. There are no fundamental values or integrity. There is only the money-making agenda.

I've heard him say, he lies, and we know it's for popularity = money. Generally, most over-opinionated loudmouths on tv are pandering to their base for profit. If Tuck were to be intellectually honest, he'd bore people to tears. It's actually a sad commentary on the public.

 

[HennyBogan]

Actually, if you follow the stories coming out of that little rat's nest. It's alleged that he wasn't far from being an accomplice in that regard.

Not surprised at all lmfao