In other words, unlike the allegedly 'unbiased media outlets', Fox has journalists who actually WILL criticize both parties! The 'other' outlets spend most of their time demonizing one party, while protecting and praising the other. This Wash post article is evidence of both!
I just love how the activists at the Wash post manage to surgically pick and choose which politically convenient points in an article or interview that helps advance their political narratives, while completely omitting the majority of points that contradicted their narratives! Although it's true that he is very critical of Trump's boastfulness and his tendency to take things too personally and lash out at people negatively, the Washington Post have CLEARLY cherry picked just a few selective opinions in their article. He was actually critical of both political parties, but he pointed out that the democrats are no longer interested in working for the middle class, and how they've become the party of the rich! They run the majority of the wealthiest districts in the country, because the richest people now vote heavily for democrats.
I actually agree with most of Tucker's criticisms of Trump. The other criticism of his, was that Trump hasn't kept his promises. But at least he has tried, but been cut short by congress. The wall would be under construction now if theyd authorize funding! I'd point out that Obama made. LOT of major campaign promises that he never kept, even with 2 terms in office!
