• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's praise for Roger Stone could amount to witness tampering – experts

JacksinPA

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
26,290
Reaction score
16,771
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/03/trump-roger-stone-tweet-witness-tampering-experts

President on Stone: ‘Nice to know some people still have guts!’
Tweet seemed to breach US code but case may be hard to prove


Donald Trump heaped public praise on a potential witness in the Russia investigation on Monday in a manner that legal experts said could amount to criminal witness tampering.

The Mueller investigation is closing in on Trump

Trump tweeted in praise of Roger Stone, his longtime political adviser, who allegedly made contacts with the WikiLeaks organization through an intermediary in an effort to help the 2016 Trump campaign. Stone has denied all wrongdoing but has said he expects to be indicted.
===========================================
Just because you say it in a public forum like Twitter does not make it any less criminal than saying it behind closed doors.
 
I would be very surprised if this investigation did not turn up at least some dirt on Trump or his kids. There is just too much smoke there for there to be no fire.
 
I would be very surprised if this investigation did not turn up at least some dirt on Trump or his kids. There is just too much smoke there for there to be no fire.

Rachel Maddow on her show on MSNBC early last week spun this web into a convincing case that Trump is beyond guilty of numerous crimes like obstruction of justice, conspiracy to defraud the United States, witness tampering...and on & on. And you can tell that this is preying on Trump & he is starting to lose it. Expect more indictments before the holidays.
 
Rachel Maddow said there was no possibility whatsoever that Trump would win the presidency - though I'm certain she had the OPer convinced of it.
 
I would be very surprised if this investigation did not turn up at least some dirt on Trump or his kids. There is just too much smoke there for there to be no fire.

Well...sometimes people mistake "fog" for smoke.

IMO that's what most of this farce of a witch-hunt has been producing since the SJW Progressive-Left lost the 2016 election...a lot of fog composed of conspiracy theory, confirmation bias, wishes, dreams, pettiness, resistance, all boiling in a pot of creamed hatred. Boiling pots often result in steamy fog.

IMO Trump may have a lot of skeleton's in his closet, having lived a long, involved, eventful life; but none related to a rigged election.

That's why so many people keep crowing about these ancillary issues with Manafort and Cohen, as if they prove the election was actually stolen. (Cue the: "You're wrong! Just look at all the indictments!!" responses. )

I expect Mueller will come out with a number of typical Prosecutorial allegations, after all that's what Prosecutors are supposed to do...try to get the "bad guy."

The whole point is to make it hard for the President to do what those of us who voted for him wanted. Make America FIRST again.
 
Last edited:
Rachel Maddow on her show on MSNBC early last week spun this web into a convincing case that Trump is beyond guilty of numerous crimes like obstruction of justice, conspiracy to defraud the United States, witness tampering...and on & on. And you can tell that this is preying on Trump & he is starting to lose it. Expect more indictments before the holidays.
You mean a convincing case to the Pavlovian salivators?
 
Back
Top Bottom